> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

2014 Influence List: Hired Guns

December 15, 2014
6116-Influence List -- Consultants
iStock

The Consultants

You know that the higher-education consultant has entered the zeitgeist when a higher-education consulting firm puts out a report that assesses, yes, the effectiveness of consultants in higher education.

Perhaps only because of the rancor that often arises when their proposals hit campus, their names have become familiar: Accenture, Bain, EY (formerly Ernst & Young), Huron, McKinsey, and Pricewaterhouse Cooper. And let’s not leave out the Education Advisory Board, the firm that produced the report assessing consulting firms’ work. Its conclusion? After looking at nearly two-dozen “engagements"—excluding its own—EAB found that the hired guns all seemed to be working from the same playbook and that the results of their efforts—for all the millions expended by their clients—were at best “mixed.”

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

The Consultants

You know that the higher-education consultant has entered the zeitgeist when a higher-education consulting firm puts out a report that assesses, yes, the effectiveness of consultants in higher education.

Perhaps only because of the rancor that often arises when their proposals hit campus, their names have become familiar: Accenture, Bain, EY (formerly Ernst & Young), Huron, McKinsey, and Pricewaterhouse Cooper. And let’s not leave out the Education Advisory Board, the firm that produced the report assessing consulting firms’ work. Its conclusion? After looking at nearly two-dozen “engagements"—excluding its own—EAB found that the hired guns all seemed to be working from the same playbook and that the results of their efforts—for all the millions expended by their clients—were at best “mixed.”

  • The People Who Shaped Higher Education This Year
    These academic newsmakers made a mark—for better or worse—in 2014.

If that is indeed a fair assessment today (the report came out in the spring of 2014), more’s the pity. Because it’s hard to argue that colleges and universities still don’t need the help. Faced with cost-conscious students, flagging state support, and challenging student-demographic trends, just about every college leader in the nation is searching for the miracle cure-all that will reduce spending and open up new streams of revenue.

Or several, in the case of an institution like the University of Kansas at Lawrence, which is now in various stages of instituting nearly a dozen major organizational changes recommended by its consultant, Huron.

ADVERTISEMENT

Yet seemingly more often than not, when the consultants from these national firms show up promoting money-saving approaches—like a “shared services” approach to administrative management (Accenture at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor and the University of Texas at Austin), a restructuring of human-resources operations (Deloitte at the public universities in Iowa), or an academic reorganization (McKinsey at the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system)—their proposals are met with resistance and distrust. In Minnesota, tensions ran so deep that two unions representing faculty members voted in October to discontinue working with McKinsey on the system’s “Charting the Future” plan.

One area where consultants do seem to be making clear impact is with recommendations concerning purchasing, but that’s probably only because most colleges are so far behind in their procurement practices that even the consultants’ standard suggestions, such as centralizing purchases with preferred vendors, can quickly pay off with demonstrable savings.

Consultants are hardly new to higher education. Some of them have been in this market for decades. What is new may be the extent to which colleges are turning to them for advice. Enrollment management, student services, research administration, international-student recruiting, marketing, even libraries—they are now all fodder for the consultants’ makeover. Recently, two firms, Huron and the Advisory Board, have moved beyond giving advice to delivering more core services by buying part or all of companies that specialize in student recruitment.

And if the moves by Deloitte and EY are any indication—those firms have recently beefed up their higher-education practices—the consulting activity is only likely to intensify.

As Ronald G. Ehrenberg, a Cornell University higher-education scholar, has noted, college leaders hire consultants when they “want someone to take the heat.” Considering the challenges ahead, the need for those services isn’t likely to cool anytime soon.

ADVERTISEMENT

—Goldie Blumenstyk

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Hiring & Retention
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin