> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Advice
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

3 Ways Colleges Can Help Faculty Members Avoid Burnout

By  David Gooblar
April 17, 2018
Work Life Balance
iStock

I was reading a 2005 essay on five theoretical frameworks that sociologists use to analyze “care work” — jobs in which people are paid to provide care — when I realized that some of those frameworks seemed to apply to academic work as well. The “prisoner of love” framework, for example, is that employees who love what they do are easier for employers to exploit. But the one that really jumped out at me was the “commodification of emotion,” which “focuses on emotional harm to workers when they have to sell services that use an intimate part of themselves.”

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

I was reading a 2005 essay on five theoretical frameworks that sociologists use to analyze “care work” — jobs in which people are paid to provide care — when I realized that some of those frameworks seemed to apply to academic work as well. The “prisoner of love” framework, for example, is that employees who love what they do are easier for employers to exploit. But the one that really jumped out at me was the “commodification of emotion,” which “focuses on emotional harm to workers when they have to sell services that use an intimate part of themselves.”

In writing about faculty burnout in these pages a couple of weeks ago, I noted that its main source seemed to be teaching: The more students we work with, the more likely we are to feel emotionally exhausted. Caring about students — and sometimes caring for them — is an integral part of most teachers’ practice. As much as I want to treat teaching as an intellectual pursuit, the emotional aspects of working closely with students to help them develop cannot be denied. Neither can the emotional costs of the work for the instructor. We may not always want to admit that we are using “an intimate part” of ourselves when we teach, but there’s little doubt that we are.

09242014-Pedagogy
Pedagogy Unbound
Looking for inspiration on teaching or some specific strategies? David Gooblar, a former lecturer in rhetoric at the University of Iowa who is now associate director of Temple University’s Center for the Advancement of Teaching, writes about classroom issues in these pages. Here is a sampling of his recent columns.
  • We Know What Works to Close the Completion Gap
  • What Elizabeth Warren Can Teach Us About Teaching
  • 3 Questions That Can Improve Your Teaching
  • What Is ‘Indoctrination’? And How Do We Avoid It in Class?

A number of commenters criticized that column for focusing on what individual faculty members could do to help reduce their own stress. Those readers felt I had ignored the institutions’ role in creating burnout. Fair enough. There’s plenty of things that colleges and universities can do on this front, and the burden shouldn’t fall entirely on faculty members themselves.

What’s more — given the importance of teaching and student success to institutional mission — it behooves campus administrators to take faculty well-being seriously and ensure that we are satisfied with our work.

Here, then, are some steps that institutions can take to prevent and combat faculty burnout.

ADVERTISEMENT

Treat all faculty members like faculty members. Nowhere is burnout more rampant, it seems, than in the nontenure-track ranks — a population that now accounts for roughly 70 percent of the American professoriate. A 2014 study of depression, stress, and anxiety among NTT faculty members produced a striking and telling result: The more committed they were to their institution, the more stressed, depressed, and anxious they felt. That result, the report’s authors hypothesized, may be the product of faculty members’ “feeling commitment to an organization that fails to reciprocate.”

A recent study of contingent-faculty well-being seems to support that hypothesis. Lisa Larson, a professor of psychology at Iowa State University, along with graduate students in her lab, have been studying how self-determination theory — the way our sense of our own competence, autonomy, and relatedness affects our well-being — might apply to faculty members.

Larson and her team’s 2016 study of 96 nontenure-track faculty members, published in the Journal of Career Assessment, found that environmental supports, such as help from a department chair or departmental recognition, combined with “perceived relatedness,” were directly connected to faculty well-being. The more that nontenure-track instructors felt supported by their department and their institution, and the more they believed they “fit in” with a community of peers, the better they felt about themselves and their work.

Four decades into American higher education’s titanic shift toward nontenure-track faculty, it is long since time to stop treating these academics as second-class citizens. Annemarie Pérez’s recent blog post about her time as an adjunct struck a chord for many because of her portrayal of the way the chair at one of her departments treated her. Her chair (whom she subsequently identified as Karen Mary Davalos, now a professor of Chicano and Latino studies at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities), mentored Pérez, observed her teaching, read and responded to her research, and repeatedly helped her prepare for the job market.

In short, the chair treated an adjunct as if she were a young member of the department, which is exactly what Pérez was.

ADVERTISEMENT

When departments and institutions treat the people doing the bulk of the teaching with the respect and value they deserve, those faculty members are far more likely to thrive. And so are the institutions.

Take a Universal Design approach to faculty mental health. The crucial principle of Universal Design is that if environments are shaped to better suit people with extraordinary needs, those environments will better suit all of us. I wrote last August about the benefits of designing our courses with the needs of a diverse range of students in mind. If we think about accessibility up front, we’re more likely to create a better learning environment for all students.

The same logic holds at an institutional level, in thinking about faculty mental health.

In their new guide, Promoting Supportive Academic Environments for Faculty With Mental Illnesses, Margaret Price and Stephanie L. Kerschbaum provide a wealth of advice for institutions looking to create policies of inclusivity and support for faculty mental health. Crucial to their recommendations is conceiving of mental illness as a normal part of a diverse professoriate — not anomalous or something that institutions should be surprised by.

As much as I want to treat teaching as an intellectual pursuit, the emotional aspects of working closely with students to help them develop cannot be denied.

Rather, the guide argues, colleges and universities should strive to create a “culture of access” in which faculty mental health is a priority. When institutions provide mental-health assistance to those who need it most, they create a culture of psychological wellness for all faculty members.

ADVERTISEMENT

Do read the guide yourself for its detailed recommendations. It should be required reading for administrators and faculty members alike.

Support faculty work/life balance. Academics take our work personally. For many of us, our jobs are more than what we do — they’re who we are. That leads to the “prisoner of love” problem.

But that tendency, it turns out, also makes institutional efforts to support a healthy work/life balance more effective. A 2012 study of 242 faculty members at the University of Maine found that the more that academics felt their institution supported their efforts to balance work and home life, “the more satisfied they were with their job, the less they intended to leave the institution, and the higher their emotional and physical health.”

Some of the factors identified by survey respondents as most helpful are things that would be fairly easy for institutions to implement: having a work culture supportive of families, being able to adjust your schedule so you can care for family members, knowing that your department is supportive of family leave.

Those are not — or shouldn’t be seen as — radical propositions in 2018. But they do make a big difference in faculty well-being for both men and women. Why? “It may be,” the authors speculated, “that these policies convey respect by the institution for individual faculty members and suggest that the institution has consideration and compassion for them.” Consideration goes a long way.

ADVERTISEMENT

Faculty well-being should not be a difficult cause to rally behind. Happy, healthy faculty members make better teachers and better researchers and are less likely to leave their jobs. If institutions hope to flourish, it’s in their interest to make sure their faculty members flourish, too.

David Gooblar is a lecturer in the rhetoric department at the University of Iowa. He writes a column on teaching for The Chronicle and runs Pedagogy Unbound, a website for college instructors who share teaching strategies. To find more advice on teaching, browse his previous columns here.

Read other items in this Pedagogy Unbound package.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
David Gooblar
David Gooblar is an assistant professor of English and of gender, women’s, and sexuality studies at the University of Iowa. He was previously associate director of Temple University’s Center for the Advancement of Teaching. His most recent book, The Missing Course: Everything They Never Taught You About College Teaching, was published by Harvard University Press in 2019. To find more advice on teaching, browse his previous columns here.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin