> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

4-Year Institutions With the Highest Percentages of Full Professors on the Faculty, Fall 2016

Almanac 2018
August 19, 2018

At just two universities did more than two-thirds of full-time instructional staff members with faculty status hold the rank of full professor in the fall of 2016. Ten of the four-year public institutions with the highest percentages of full professors were in California, three were in Minnesota, and two each in Connecticut and Wisconsin. Among the top 25 private nonprofit institutions, five each were in California and Massachusetts, and two each were in Indiana, Rhode Island, and Texas. Faculty members at private nonprofit institutions were slightly more likely to have reached the rank of professor by the fall of 2016 than were those at public institutions.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

At just two universities did more than two-thirds of full-time instructional staff members with faculty status hold the rank of full professor in the fall of 2016. Ten of the four-year public institutions with the highest percentages of full professors were in California, three were in Minnesota, and two each in Connecticut and Wisconsin. Among the top 25 private nonprofit institutions, five each were in California and Massachusetts, and two each were in Indiana, Rhode Island, and Texas. Faculty members at private nonprofit institutions were slightly more likely to have reached the rank of professor by the fall of 2016 than were those at public institutions.


Return to the Almanac home page, or go to the Profession, Students, Finance, or States section. To purchase a copy of the Almanac in print or as a downloadable interactive PDF, visit the Chronicle Store. Help guide us to give you the data you need by taking our 10-minute online Almanac survey.


4-year public institutions

RankInstitution Total with faculty status, all ranks ProfessorsAssociate professorsAssistant professorsInstructorsLecturersNo academic rank
1. City U. of New York Graduate Center 243 67.1% 14.0% 14.8% 0.0% 4.1% 0.0%
2. U. of California at Santa Barbara 967 53.9% 16.0% 14.9% 0.0% 15.2% 0.0%
3. Minnesota State U. at Moorhead 209 53.6% 20.1% 23.4% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0%
4. U. of California at Berkeley 1,641 52.8% 19.0% 15.8% 0.4% 11.2% 0.9%
5. Sonoma State U. 258 49.2% 18.2% 18.6% 0.0% 14.0% 0.0%
6. U. of California at Davis 2,302 49.2% 20.2% 23.1% 0.0% 7.6% 0.0%
7. U. of California at San Diego 2,239 49.1% 19.7% 22.9% 0.0% 8.3% 0.0%
8. U. of California at Santa Cruz 589 48.6% 23.4% 18.5% 0.0% 8.5% 1.0%
9. U. of Wisconsin at River Falls 212 48.1% 19.3% 22.6% 0.0% 9.9% 0.0%
10. St. Cloud State U. 423 48.0% 25.5% 23.4% 3.1% 0.0% 0.0%
11. Southwest Minnesota State U. 102 47.1% 26.5% 26.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
12. Truman State U. 332 46.7% 11.7% 31.3% 10.2% 0.0% 0.0%
13. Eastern Michigan U. 755 46.5% 20.0% 21.1% 0.4% 12.1% 0.0%
14. U. of California at Los Angeles 3,430 46.5% 16.8% 22.7% 8.3% 5.6% 0.2%
15. Southeastern Oklahoma State U. 110 46.4% 20.9% 20.0% 12.7% 0.0% 0.0%
16. Eastern Connecticut State U. 199 46.2% 21.1% 32.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
17. California State U. at Sacramento 725 46.2% 17.4% 20.0% 0.0% 16.0% 0.4%
18. U. of California at Irvine 1,775 46.0% 20.6% 20.2% 2.8% 10.4% 0.0%
19. Virginia Military Institute 134 44.8% 17.2% 35.1% 2.2% 0.7% 0.0%
20. U. of Wisconsin at Madison 3,362 44.8% 21.0% 26.9% 4.8% 2.5% 0.0%
21. Central Connecticut State U. 446 43.7% 29.6% 25.8% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0%
22. Southern Oregon U. 161 43.5% 22.4% 14.9% 19.3% 0.0% 0.0%
23. Purdue U. at West Lafayette 1,819 43.2% 28.1% 27.5% 0.4% 0.8% 0.0%
24. Wayne State College 121 43.0% 23.1% 28.9% 4.1% 0.8% 0.0%
25. California State U. at San Bernardino 475 42.7% 13.5% 24.4% 0.0% 18.7% 0.6%
All 478 institutions in category 318,418 29.4% 25.6% 26.5% 7.1% 9.2% 2.2%

4-year private nonprofit institutions

RankInstitution Total with faculty status, all ranks ProfessorsAssociate professorsAssistant professorsInstructorsLecturersNo academic rank
1. California Institute of Technology 331 73.4% 1.5% 13.3% 5.1% 5.1% 1.5%
2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1,014 63.6% 20.3% 16.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3. Stanford U. 1,990 58.5% 20.5% 21.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4. Harvard U. 2,137 57.1% 8.0% 12.3% 3.3% 19.2% 0.0%
5. Point Loma Nazarene U. 134 56.0% 31.3% 12.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
6. Calvin College 252 53.6% 27.4% 19.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
7. U. of Redlands 218 52.3% 22.0% 6.0% 0.0% 5.5% 14.2%
8. Davidson College 185 51.9% 15.7% 29.7% 0.5% 2.2% 0.0%
9. North Park U. 116 51.7% 24.1% 24.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
10. Princeton U. 924 51.5% 10.7% 19.3% 1.8% 16.7% 0.0%
11. Williams College 298 50.7% 13.1% 25.8% 5.0% 5.4% 0.0%
12. Smith College 296 50.3% 16.6% 15.5% 0.0% 17.6% 0.0%
13. Harvey Mudd College 103 49.5% 20.4% 30.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
14. Curry College 101 49.5% 19.8% 30.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
15. Juniata College 110 48.2% 24.5% 20.9% 6.4% 0.0% 0.0%
16. Furman U. 239 48.1% 28.9% 21.8% 0.4% 0.0% 0.8%
17. DePauw U. 226 47.8% 24.8% 26.5% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0%
18. Brown U. 817 47.4% 17.0% 17.5% 0.0% 8.8% 9.3%
19. Hardin-Simmons U. 135 46.7% 30.4% 16.3% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0%
20. Rice U. 671 46.2% 16.7% 14.3% 3.4% 18.3% 1.0%
21. Carleton College 236 46.2% 20.8% 25.0% 2.1% 5.5% 0.4%
22. Washington and Lee U. 244 45.9% 25.0% 25.8% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0%
23. Taylor U. 131 45.8% 21.4% 29.8% 3.1% 0.0% 0.0%
24. Ohio Wesleyan U. 138 45.7% 29.7% 22.5% 1.4% 0.7% 0.0%
25. Roger Williams U. 215 45.1% 34.4% 20.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All 424 institutions in category 158,330 31.0% 26.0% 27.5% 6.3% 6.2% 3.0%

Note: Only institutions classified as doctoral, master’s, and baccalaureate (but not baccalaureate/associate) under the 2015 Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education are included in this analysis. Institutions with fewer than 100 faculty members and those without tenure systems were excluded. Employees considered in the analysis were full-time instructional staff members with faculty status in the fall of 2016. Instructors, lecturers, and those with no academic rank who were not accorded faculty status by their institutions were excluded. Percentages are rounded, but institutions were ranked before rounding. Questions or comments on the Almanac should be sent to the Almanac editor.

Source: Chronicle analysis of U.S. Department of Education data</small></p>

ADVERTISEMENT

A version of this article appeared in the August 24, 2018, issue.
Read other items in this The Profession: Almanac 2018 package.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Leadership & GovernanceFinance & OperationsData
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin