Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
The Graduate Adviser

‘4 Years Is Enough’ and Other Reforms

Ideas floated at the AHA and MLA conventions aim to rethink doctoral education

By Leonard Cassuto February 17, 2014
‘4 Years Is Enough’ and Other Reforms 1
Linda Helton for The Chronicle

The Modern Language Association and the American Historical Association have venerable and distinctly separate histories, but their graduate-student members face a lot of similar problems. Those problems, like elongated times to degree and a withered academic job market, aren’t news anymore. But the efforts of the MLA and the AHA to deal with them are becoming more varied, visible, and creative.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The Modern Language Association and the American Historical Association have venerable and distinctly separate histories, but their graduate-student members face a lot of similar problems. Those problems, like elongated times to degree and a withered academic job market, aren’t news anymore. But the efforts of the MLA and the AHA to deal with them are becoming more varied, visible, and creative.

For a long time the AHA and the MLA conventions were like parallel universes that coalesced annually in different cities at the same time. They both stage high-profile conventions during winter break that combine a myriad of scholarly panels with a high-volume, high-tension job fair filled with nervous, well-dressed candidates who generate
heavy traffic to interviews in job centers and hotel suites. But new scheduling policies separated them on the calendar this year, so I pinballed between Washington and Chicago during the first part of January, attending both shows with a few days respite in between.

I sought a sense of how these two learned societies, the oldest and largest in the humanities, are dealing with the high-profile problems that face graduate education in their disciplines these days. For years the annual meetings marginalized the cruelties of the tenure-track market and the lengthening time it took to get a Ph.D., even as the mass media did the opposite. The frenzied employment agora at the conferences has always made for good copy.

The official rostrums aren’t silent on these subjects anymore. The program committees of both organizations now allot space for institutional problems to get discussed in public air. (Activists have also been sponsoring an annual MLA “Subconference” to increase the pressure for change.) The MLA and AHA have even started working together on some of the most egregious employment problems that plague graduate education in the humanities.

Their formal collaboration began last year with a grant to both associations from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation to track the placement of Ph.D.’s over the past generation. We’ve seen placement studies before, but they’ve maintained a blinkered focus on who got the professorships and ignored what happened to everyone else. This study is different: It’s dedicated to the nonprofessorial outcomes that were elided before. The data-gathering (from the years 1998-2009) isn’t finished, but both organizations presented preliminary reports at their annual meetings this year. And in an unusual move, an MLA officer presented at AHA, and vice versa.

The coordinated placement study amounted to only a small part of the career-related initiative on display at both conferences. No doubt the placement project will receive more publicity when it’s done, but many thousands of Ph.D.’s remain to be tracked down. The job is as large as it is overdue. Even so, the AHA has published some early findings. Maren Wood and Robert Townsend’s “The Many Careers of History Ph.D.’s” is now on the organization’s website, along with other research and discussion about the range of career paths taken by historians.

It’s hard to generalize when faced with two monster conferences that offered more than 1,000 panels altogether, but I will anyway: The AHA is doing the most creative work in the humanities on alternative-academic careers right now, while the MLA is reflecting more deeply and practically on the problem of time-to-degree.

The AHA’s most noteworthy alternative-career project is called the Malleable Ph.D. Rolled out last year, it showcases careers for historians outside the professoriate. The Malleable Ph.D. threaded together a number of panels at this year’s conference, and placed a range of different kinds of historians on the profession’s biggest stage.

I noticed the audience avidly taking notes as Robert Dalessandro, director of the U.S. Army Center of Military History—and one of the U.S. Army’s hundreds of official historians—explained how he got his job and what Army historians do. Historians are deployed in the field, he explained, as part of a general “outreach” effort to “decision makers and the public.”

Other government historians were received eagerly, too. John A. Lawrence, a history Ph.D. who served for many years as Nancy Pelosi’s chief of staff until he stepped down recently, said that history departments have “remained far too cautious about encouraging nonacademic careers.” They should not just tolerate graduate students whose interests lie outside of the academy, he said, they should actively recruit them. His own skills, he said, have always been relevant to the job he did—and he noted that the most influential public historian of our time is none other than Newt Gingrich. Doctorates, said Lawrence, are “more impressive on Capitol Hill than law degrees,” which are “a dime a dozen.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Julia Brookins, the AHA’s special-projects
coordinator, declared that training for alternative or nonacademic careers is not a “diversion from the life of the mind.” In fact, she said, such diverse preparation also helps a graduate to be a better faculty member. “This is not a matter of a job crisis,” added Jacqueline Jones, the departing vice president of the association’s professional division, “but of individuals and what they want to do.”

As R. Darrell Meadows, director of research and interpretation for the Kentucky Historical Society, put it, “I didn’t leave the discipline. I took it with me.”

The MLA is also actively contemplating the employment problems facing humanities Ph.D.’s, but not as coherently. Perhaps that’s because there aren’t as many “public literature” positions as public-history jobs, or maybe because the glow of digital humanities at the moment is eclipsing other possibilities on the MLA horizon.

But the association is reckoning with another deeply disturbing problem: the interminable time it takes graduate students to earn a Ph.D. in English and other humanities fields. And the group is tackling that issue in a way that acknowledges its complexity. Throughout the MLA conference, presenters observed in different ways that excessive time-to-degree—the median time currently stands at nine years in the humanities—is deeply rooted in the structures of Ph.D. programs themselves.

ADVERTISEMENT

That led to some lively questioning of the format and parameters of the dissertation, among other things. Nick Sousanis, a graduate student at Columbia University’s Teachers’ College, offered an unusual example. He displayed excerpts from his thesis, which he has written in the form of a comic book. He used that new format to argue that the old format of the dissertation amounts to “an argument in large part about itself.”

Many speakers at the MLA noted the built-in flaws of a system that essentially creates Mini-Me’s out of the senior scholars at research universities who direct dissertations, even though most available teaching jobs aren’t at research universities.

Graduate students have responded to the need to become accomplished researchers and high-powered teachers by doing, well, both. Shane Peterson, a postdoctoral teaching fellow in German at Washington University in St. Louis, identified that particular elephant in the room when he questioned having graduate students both do more and finish faster. Peterson’s panel was, appropriately, dedicated to “Competing Agendas and Ethics in Graduate Education.”

Russell Berman, a former MLA president, is spearheading the organization’s official response to these ethical deficits as head of its task force on doctoral study. Berman wrote sensitively about these problems as president, and he has continued to do so at Stanford University, where he is a professor of German and comparative literature. (Some of his ideas are contained in a well-circulated white paper that I wrote about here in 2012.)

ADVERTISEMENT

The task force will release its final report soon, but it’s already clear that Berman and his group see time-to-degree as inseparable from a tangled web of problems facing graduate education, including not only the dissertation and the job market but also graduate-student debt, and access to doctoral education for members of disadvantaged groups.

“How do we design a Ph.D. based on nonreplicative principles?” asked John Stevenson, dean of the graduate school at the University of Colorado at Boulder. Stevenson, speaking on a panel organized by Berman, described the new four-year Ph.D. program piloted by the German department at Colorado. It’s a return to the old days, when a doctorate comprised two years of coursework followed by a year of research and a year of writing. The beginning premise of this experiment, said Stevenson, is “that four years is enough.”

Lots of MLA members are rooting for that new program to succeed. If it does, it will be because its students embrace the possibility of diverse career outcomes early on, and because professors embrace the achievements of those graduates.

Ethically speaking, a four-year Ph.D. is much easier to justify than a nine-year slog. The current rate of tenure-track placement of Ph.D.’s in history, English, and modern languages hovers just a bit above 50 percent. That those Ph.D.’s have invested a decade of their lives in doctoral training makes that outcome a lot worse.

ADVERTISEMENT

David Laurence, the MLA’s director of research, said that if graduate students feel that they have choices, they’ll do better. They’ll be “energized” rather than “paralyzed.” It’s time, he said, to “naturalize this approach in graduate education.”

But if time-to-degree is going to drop, then hiring committees need to give a fair shot to job candidates who finish sooner. Daniel Purdy, a German professor at Pennsylvania State University who spoke on the ethics panel at the MLA, said that the rooms where hiring committees meet is where ethical decision making has to take place. And that’s not happening yet. If committees look with skepticism at a candidate who has finished a degree program quickly, then what is the value of helping students finish faster?

During a discussion at the MLA, Berman called the issue of hiring ethics “the third rail” of the debate. Maybe it is, but we have to risk the electric shock. Current time-to-degree is morally untenable, but we can’t sustain the decision to speed it up unless we respect the graduates we produce. The choice to honor the shorter path to the degree lies before the teachers, not the students. Individual professors, hiring committees, and departments must choose themselves whether to hire Ph.D.’s who finish quickly. For what good would it serve to promote a tightened, shorter degree program that we ourselves disrespect?

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
cassuto_leonard.jpg
About the Author
Leonard Cassuto
Leonard Cassuto is a professor of English at Fordham University who writes regularly for The Chronicle about graduate education. His newest book is Academic Writing as if Readers Matter, from Princeton University Press. He co-wrote, with Robert Weisbuch, The New Ph.D.: How to Build a Better Graduate Education. He welcomes comments and suggestions at cassuto@fordham.edu. Find him on X @LCassuto.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin