> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

5 Insights From an Admissions Office That Changed Its Process

By  Eric Hoover
March 12, 2017

Governed by many rituals, admissions offices often resist change. When Rick Bischoff heard that other colleges were doing initial evaluations of applicants in two-person teams, he scoffed. “The stupidest thing I’ve ever heard of,” he recalls saying.

But Mr. Bischoff, vice president for enrollment management at Case Western Reserve University, is now a true believer. Since the university adopted the new model, in 2015, he says admissions evaluations have become more efficient — and thorough. Two cycles in, some themes have emerged.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Governed by many rituals, admissions offices often resist change. When Rick Bischoff heard that other colleges were doing initial evaluations of applicants in two-person teams, he scoffed. “The stupidest thing I’ve ever heard of,” he recalls saying.

But Mr. Bischoff, vice president for enrollment management at Case Western Reserve University, is now a true believer. Since the university adopted the new model, in 2015, he says admissions evaluations have become more efficient — and thorough. Two cycles in, some themes have emerged.

Faster reading can be better reading.

Mr. Bischoff’s initial skepticism of the model faded after he and a seasoned colleague sat down one day to compare their assessments of the same applications. Some didn’t match. “When we had different evaluations, it was usually because one of us saw something the other didn’t,” he says. Team-based evaluations can keep admissions officers on the same page. “This helps us eliminate the errant read, the missed data point,” he says. “Now we can reconcile all those things immediately.”

Typically, the team spends about eight minutes on each file. “You’re getting the intensity of the time,” Mr. Bischoff says. “When you’re reading with someone else, there’s no stopping to check your email.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The process saves time and money.

As application pools have swelled, many colleges have hired part-time readers to keep up with the volume. With 25,000 applications this year (4,000 more than just two years ago), the admissions office would need about three times as many part-time readers to keep pace if it were using the old evaluation model, Mr. Bischoff figures. “It’s not trivial in terms of cost,” he says. “And though they still bring value to the process, there’s the increased complexity of managing large numbers of outside readers.”

Training becomes more important.

The team-reading model has prompted admissions officials to think harder about preparing staff members for evaluations.

“Now, we’re doing a much deeper dive in training,” Mr. Bischoff says. “It’s forced us to have those contextual conversations about how you don’t look at an applicant who’s a first-generation student from a small town the same way as you look at suburban student from a school with many AP courses.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Changing a work culture can be good …

Retaining staff is a challenge for many admissions offices, where long hours are the norm. “In this field, we work people to within an inch of their life,” Mr. Bischoff says. The new model, he explains, has freed up many evenings and weekend hours that staffers previously spent reading applications. A better work-life balance, he hopes, will help keep talented staff members around longer.

… but also jarring.

Ever since applications went digital, admissions officers have been able to read applications at home. One can work in pajamas, hit the gym whenever, and dive into files at odd hours. Yet team-reading requires staffers to be in the office at set times. “That’s a fundamental shift in how admissions people think about doing their work,” Mr. Bischoff says. “Before, you controlled your day, and you don’t have that control anymore. That’s a big psychological change.”

Eric Hoover writes about admissions trends, enrollment-management challenges, and the meaning of Animal House, among other issues. He’s on Twitter @erichoov, and his email address is eric.hoover@chronicle.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

A version of this article appeared in the March 17, 2017, issue.
Read other items in this Working Smarter, Not Harder, in Admissions package.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
First-Generation Students
Eric Hoover
Eric Hoover writes about the challenges of getting to, and through, college. Follow him on Twitter @erichoov, or email him, at eric.hoover@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin