> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

5 Paths for Small Colleges

By  Lawrence Biemiller
March 11, 2018

In a 2017 white paper for the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, Mary B. Marcy outlined five approaches that small colleges are taking in an era of “evolving realities of costs, demographics, and quality.”

6427 idea lab niche icon bullseye
Small Colleges Are Withering. Can Niches Save Them?
Leaders hope souped-up advising, international and research programs, and other ambitious offerings will keep them afloat. But can the institutions afford them, and will they work? It’s too soon to tell.
  • Can a Signature Program Save Your College?

Marcy, president of Dominican University of California, wrote that the four new approaches (the fifth is to carry on as before) are responses to tuition discounting and to a “shift in focus from college as a public good to a private service,” which has, she writes, “led to a devaluing of the liberal arts and a rise in professional and preprofessional programs.”

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

In a 2017 white paper for the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, Mary B. Marcy outlined five approaches that small colleges are taking in an era of “evolving realities of costs, demographics, and quality.”

6427 idea lab niche icon bullseye
Small Colleges Are Withering. Can Niches Save Them?
Leaders hope souped-up advising, international and research programs, and other ambitious offerings will keep them afloat. But can the institutions afford them, and will they work? It’s too soon to tell.

Marcy, president of Dominican University of California, wrote that the four new approaches (the fifth is to carry on as before) are responses to tuition discounting and to a “shift in focus from college as a public good to a private service,” which has, she writes, “led to a devaluing of the liberal arts and a rise in professional and preprofessional programs.”

She described the approaches at a recent meeting of the Board of Trustees of Queens University of Charlotte:

  • The traditional college — think Amherst, Pomona, Swarthmore, or Williams — is an undergraduate, residential liberal-arts institution with a strong reputation. But “very few institutions actually look like this now,” Marcy notes. It’s an expensive approach that requires a big endowment and doesn’t necessarily adapt well to changes in the kinds of students seeking an education, she says.
  • The new American college — the model Marcy says is followed by most non-elite small private institutions, including Florida Southern College and Mary Baldwin University — retains its residential, liberal-arts core but adds professional and graduate programs. The institutions, she says, are “typically small colleges adapting to the last big financial crisis.”
  • The distinctive program is often, but not always, an addition to the new American college, as is true at Marcy’s own institution, Dominican, and at Queens University of Charlotte. “A common student experience defines this institution,” she says, “and that experience is going to be focused on quality.”
  • Expansion — the model adopted by Chapman and Drew Universities — retains a “limited” commitment to the liberal arts, concentrating instead on adding professional and graduate programs to meet market demand. “The expansion model is where most small colleges that are innovating are headed if they can,” Marcy says.
  • Expansion and separation — the model into which Antioch and Southern New Hampshire Universities have evolved — turns to branch campuses or online programs to maintain enrollment. A core campus may or may not still be part of the institution. This model, Marcy says, is challenging for small colleges “because there’s a lot of upfront investment unless you’re already doing an awful lot online.”
ADVERTISEMENT

A version of this article appeared in the March 16, 2018, issue.
Read other items in this Small Colleges Are Withering. Can Niches Save Them? package.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Lawrence Biemiller
Lawrence Biemiller was a senior writer who began working at The Chronicle of Higher Education in 1980. He wrote about campus architecture, the arts, and small colleges, among many other topics.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin