Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
News

8 Universities. Millions in Bribes. 10 Corrupt Coaches. What You Need to Know About the Admissions-Bribery Scandal.

By Sarah Brown March 12, 2019
big picture2

A wide-ranging bribery scheme is unsettling higher education, raising uncomfortable questions about the role of wealth and privilege in the admissions process.

As detailed in U.S. Department of Justice filings, the scheme involved a company, known as “the Key,” that illegally manipulated two main “side doors” to secure the admission of its clients’ children to elite universities. The Key, run by William Rick Singer, bribed officials at college-entrance examination companies to allow third parties to take the students’ tests for them. And it bribed college coaches to identify the students as recruited athletes — guaranteeing them preferential treatment by the admissions office — even though they were not so recruited.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

big picture2

A wide-ranging bribery scheme is unsettling higher education, raising uncomfortable questions about the role of wealth and privilege in the admissions process.

As detailed in U.S. Department of Justice filings, the scheme involved a company, known as “the Key,” that illegally manipulated two main “side doors” to secure the admission of its clients’ children to elite universities. The Key, run by William Rick Singer, bribed officials at college-entrance examination companies to allow third parties to take the students’ tests for them. And it bribed college coaches to identify the students as recruited athletes — guaranteeing them preferential treatment by the admissions office — even though they were not so recruited.

The court documents provide many examples of how the scheme worked, though there may have been more money and more students involved. Here’s a breakdown of what the documents tell us about the scandal:

U. of Southern California

Who Was Involved?

Ali Khosroshahin
Ali Khosroshahin

Jovan Vavic
Jovan Vavic

Laura Janke
Laura Janke

  • Donna Heinel, senior associate athletic director
  • Ali Khosroshahin, former head coach of the women’s soccer team
  • Laura Janke, a former assistant coach of the women’s soccer team
  • Jovan Vavic, head coach of the water-polo team

How Much Money?

  • $1.3 million paid to university accounts that Heinel controlled; plus $20,000 per month paid to Heinel starting last July
  • $350,000 paid to a private soccer club controlled by Khosroshahin and Janke
  • $250,000 paid to the water-polo team, plus private-school tuition payments for Vavic’s children
    Collage of admissions-bribery scheme, March 2019, w/o caption
    Admission Through the ‘Side Door’
    Dozens of people, including famous actors, college coaches, and a university administrator, have been charged by federal prosecutors for their alleged roles in an admissions-bribery scheme involving Yale, Stanford, and other elite institutions.
    • One Year After College-Admissions Scandal, 3 Questions About What (if Anything) Has Changed
    • 5 Questions to Consider in the Wake of the Admissions Scandal
    • The Bribery Scandal Revealed Holes in Admissions Oversight. Now Some Professors Want to Take Back That Role.

How Many Students?

More than two dozen.

Example

Heinel agreed to make sure an applicant was designated as a recruited athlete for the women’s crew team, even though the applicant had no experience in rowing. Janke created a fake athlete profile, describing her as a coxswain, and sent it to Heinel. The profile included a photo of a female rower that Janke found online. USC’s athletic admissions subcommittee gave the applicant conditional acceptance, as long as she met all eligibility requirements. Khosroshahin and Janke also created fake athlete profiles and facilitated transactions at other universities.


Yale U.

Who Was Involved?

meredith2

Randolph (Rudy) Meredith, former head coach of the women’s soccer team (he was a cooperating witness; he agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud and honest-services wire fraud, as well as honest-services wire fraud, in hopes of lessening his sentence)

How Much Money?

  • $1.2 million paid by the parents to Singer, who then paid $400,000 to Meredith

How Many Students?

One.

Example

Meredith designated an applicant as a recruit for Yale’s soccer team, even though he knew that she didn’t play competitive soccer. Janke, the USC assistant coach, created a fake athlete profile for the applicant, describing her as a star midfielder, and pretended that she and Khosroshahin had coached the applicant. The profile was sent to Meredith. After the applicant was admitted to Yale, Meredith received a personal check for $400,000.


Georgetown U.

Who Was Involved?

  • Gordon Ernst, former head coach of the men’s and women’s tennis teams

How Much Money?

  • $2.7 million paid to Ernst, falsely described as consulting fees

How Many Students?

At least 12.

Example

Ernst had three admissions spots to use per year for recruited tennis players, and in 2015 he used all three for children of Singer’s clients. In one case, an applicant forwarded an email to Ernst describing his tennis abilities, even though he didn’t play tennis. Ernst forwarded that email to an admissions officer.


U. of California at Los Angeles

Who Was Involved?

salcedo

Jorge Salcedo, head coach of the men’s soccer team

How Much Money?

  • $250,000 worth of Facebook shares paid by the parents to Singer
  • $100,000 paid to Salcedo
  • $100,000 paid to a sports-marketing company that Salcedo controlled
  • $50,000 paid to Khosroshahin

How Many Students?

Two.

Example

Salcedo received a fake soccer profile for an applicant from Khosroshahin, the USC soccer coach. Salcedo then forwarded the applicant’s transcript and test scores to a women’s soccer coach. UCLA’s student-athlete admissions committee admitted her on a provisional basis, as long as she finished her senior year of high school and participated on the soccer team for at least one year.


Wake Forest U.

Who Was Involved?

ferguson

William Ferguson, head coach of the women’s volleyball team

How Much Money?

  • $100,000 paid to Ferguson through the Wake Forest Deacon Club, the women’s volleyball team, and a private volleyball camp that Ferguson controlled

How Many Students?

One.

Example

Ferguson agreed to designate one applicant who had been wait-listed as a women’s volleyball recruit.


Stanford U.

Who Was Involved?

vende

John Vandemoer, head coach of the sailing team (he has already agreed to plead guilty to a charge of racketeering conspiracy)

How Much Money?

  • $270,000 paid to the Stanford sailing team (in one case, $500,000 was promised, but the student ultimately didn’t enroll; $160,000 was still paid as a deposit for another student’s future enrollment)

How Many Students?

Two.

Example

Vandemoer agreed to designate one applicant as a recruit for Stanford’s sailing team, even though he wasn’t a competitive sailor. Janke, the USC assistant coach, created a fake athlete profile for the applicant. The applicant deferred his Stanford application for one year, but the sailing program was paid $110,000 to guarantee that he would be considered a sailing recruit in the next year. The applicant eventually attended a different university.


U. of Texas at Austin

Who Was Involved?

  • Michael Center, a tennis coach

How Much Money?

  • $100,000 paid to the coach
  • $100,000 paid to Martin Fox, president of a private tennis academy and camp in Houston

How Many Students?

One.

Example

The coach designated an applicant as a recruited tennis player, even though the applicant didn’t play tennis. Fox assisted with the bribe.


U. of San Diego

Who Was Involved?

  • An unnamed varsity sports coach

How Much Money?

  • $100,000 paid to Fox
  • $10,000 paid to the coach

How Many Students?

Two.

Example

The unnamed coach designated one applicant as a team manager to help her get admitted at San Diego. She ultimately decided not to attend the university, but the coach was still paid for his help. Fox assisted with the bribe.

Update (3/13/2019, 12:07 p.m.): This article has been updated to include the name of the tennis coach, Michael Center, at UT-Austin.

Sarah Brown writes about a range of higher-education topics, including sexual assault, race on campus, and Greek life. Follow her on Twitter @Brown_e_Points, or email her at sarah.brown@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the March 22, 2019, issue.
Read other items in Admission Through the ‘Side Door’.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Admissions & Enrollment Innovation & Transformation
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
SarahBrown2024
About the Author
Sarah Brown
Sarah Brown is The Chronicle’s news editor. Follow her on Twitter @Brown_e_Points, or email her at sarah.brown@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits
Photo illustration showing a figurine of a football player with a large price tag on it.
Athletics
Loans, Fees, and TV Money: Where Colleges Are Finding the Funds to Pay Athletes
Photo illustration of a donation jar turned on it's side, with coins spilling out.
Access & Affordability
Congressional Republicans Want to End Grad PLUS Loans. How Might It Affect Your Campus?
Florida Commissioner of Education Manny Diaz, Jr. delivers remarks during the State Board of Education meeting at Winter Park High School, Wednesday, March 27, 2024.
Executive Privilege
In Florida, University Presidents’ Pay Goes Up. Is Politics to Blame?

From The Review

Photo-based illustration of a tentacle holding a microscope
The Review | Essay
In Defense of ‘Silly’ Science
By Carly Anne York
Illustration showing a graduate's hand holding a college diploma and another hand but a vote into a ballot box
The Review | Essay
Civics Education Is Back. It Shouldn’t Belong to Conservatives.
By Timothy Messer-Kruse
Photo-based illustration of a hedges shaped like dollar signs in various degrees of having been over-trimmed by a shadowed Donald Trump figure carrying hedge trimmers.
The Review | Essay
What Will Be Left of Higher Ed in Four Years?
By Brendan Cantwell

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: A Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin