> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Black Scientists Face a Big Disadvantage in Winning NIH Grants, Study Finds

By  Nell Gluckman
June 3, 2020
The Department of Health and Human Services, which operates the National Institutes of Health
Sipa USA via AP
The Department of Health and Human Services, which operates the National Institutes of Health

Black researchers applying for funding from the National Institutes of Health consistently receive lower scores than do white applicants in the first phase of the grant-application process, according to a report released on Wednesday by scholars at the University of Washington.

Those scores are a key reason black researchers receive far fewer grants from the NIH than do white applicants, say Elena A. Erosheva, a statistics professor, and Carole J. Lee, an associate professor of philosophy, who with four other colleagues prepared the report under an NIH contract to study racial disparities. “The overall award rate for the data we were looking at for black applicants is 55 percent of that for white applicants,” Erosheva said.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Black researchers applying for funding from the National Institutes of Health consistently receive lower scores than do white applicants in the first phase of the grant-application process, according to a report released on Wednesday by scholars at the University of Washington.

Those scores are a key reason black researchers receive far fewer grants from the NIH than do white applicants, say Elena A. Erosheva, a statistics professor, and Carole J. Lee, an associate professor of philosophy, who with four other colleagues prepared the report under an NIH contract to study racial disparities. “The overall award rate for the data we were looking at for black applicants is 55 percent of that for white applicants,” Erosheva said.

When the NIH receives grant applications, they’re read and scored by reviewers on five criteria: significance, innovation, approach, environment, and how well suited the investigators are to the project. Applications also receive an overall score. About half the applications make it past this round to a phase in which they’re reviewed by a panel. Those reviewers don’t know applicants’ race, but they can see applicants’ names and some information about their other published work, Erosheva said.

Erosheva and Lee focused on the actual scores that applications received from 2014 to 2016. They found that in every metric, black researchers tended to score lower than white researchers did. The new study does not ask why, but earlier research, including an analysis published last year by the NIH, has found that black applicants are more likely to propose studying health disparities, which are less likely to be funded by the agency.

The NIH introduced numerical scores for the five criteria in 2009 to bring more transparency to the process, Lee said. There’s still room, though, for bias in how those scores are awarded. Lee and Erosheva wrote that racism, or “implicit racial bias,” could explain the differences in scores.

ADVERTISEMENT

Erica T. Warner, an assistant professor at the Harvard Medical School who studies risk factors for breast cancer, said that black researchers often propose topics such as how environmental factors contribute to health risks in black communities. When studies of those factors are not funded, health risks are more likely to persist.

“We’re seeing it right now with the Covid-19 pandemic,” she said. “As new infectious diseases arise, the existing disparities get replicated.”

Warner, who has also conducted research on mentorship, noted that another explanation for the lower award rates could be that underrepresented-minority scientists tend to have smaller professional networks.

“Their exposure to what that quote-unquote standard approach is might be different,” Warner said. “Sometimes when we see something differently, it can be evaluated as worse off.”

Black Americans have been disproportionately affected by the coronavirus pandemic. A recent report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that 33 percent of hospitalized patients were African American, though black residents made up 18 percent of the population studied. In New York City, the CDC said, citing data from the city’s health department, the death rate in the black and African American population was 92.5 per 100,000 people, while it was 45.2 per 100,000 among whites.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lee said the NIH’s Center for Scientific Review is looking into whether it should simplify how the criteria are scored. “I’m hoping they’ll keep these issues in mind as they think about how to reform that process,” she said.

“The approach that the NIH has taken in the enhanced peer-review system is to say, If we give reviewers clear, objective criteria, then the decisions they make will be solely merit-based,” said Warner, who reviewed the new paper. “It doesn’t appear that that’s enough.”

Update (June 6, 2020, 2:00 p.m.): The article now contains additional detail from the study.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Scholarship & Research
Nell Gluckman
Nell Gluckman is a senior reporter who writes about research, ethics, funding issues, affirmative action, and other higher-education topics. You can follow her on Twitter @nellgluckman, or email her at nell.gluckman@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin