Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    A Culture of Cybersecurity
    Opportunities in the Hard Sciences
    Career Preparation
Sign In
Courts

A Closer Look at a Comment From Justice Scalia That Sparked Outrage

By Beckie Supiano December 9, 2015

Justice Antonin Scalia lit up the Internet on Wednesday after oral arguments in the Supreme Court’s reconsideration of a closely watched affirmative-action case, by raising the idea that African-American students might fare better at a “slower-track school.”

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Justice Antonin Scalia lit up the Internet on Wednesday after oral arguments in the Supreme Court’s reconsideration of a closely watched affirmative-action case, by raising the idea that African-American students might fare better at a “slower-track school.”

Here’s what Justice Scalia had to say in the arguments over the case, Abigail Noel Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin:

Justice Scalia: There are — there are those who contend that it does not benefit African-Americans to — to get them into the University of Texas where they do not do well, as opposed to having them go to a less-advanced school, a less — a slower-track school where they do well. One of — one of the briefs pointed out that — that most of the — most of the black scientists in this country don’t come from schools like the University of Texas.
Mr. Garre: So this court —
Justice Scalia: They come from lesser schools where they do not feel that they’re — that they’re being pushed ahead in — in classes that are too — too fast for them.

Reaction online was swift and fierce. Here are a few examples:

2015 is exposing the reality that racism exists at the highest levels of American jurisprudence. Scalia is a racist
pic.twitter.com/PnM34FGHyh

— Shaun King (@ShaunKing) December 9, 2015

Appalled and disappointed (but NOT surprised) at Scalia’s misinformed comments about the readiness of #BlackandSTEM https://t.co/zZSogh5ToH

— Jedidah Isler, PhD (@JedidahIslerPhD) December 9, 2015

If I listened to #Scalia I never would have applied to and graduated from 2 Ivy League schools. This level of ignorance is dangerous.

— Vanessa K. De Luca (@Vanessa_KDeLuca) December 9, 2015

What was the justice referring to, anyhow? Let’s break his comments into two parts. We’ll start with this question of whether students would “do well” at the University of Texas at Austin or someplace “less advanced.”

Here Justice Scalia appears to be referring to the idea of “mismatch,” which argues that students who are admitted to a college under a preference, despite having weaker academic credentials than the college’s typical student, are less likely to succeed there.

It’s an idea that’s been studied and debated for years. Richard H. Sander, an economist and law professor at the University of California at Los Angeles, released a controversial study over a decade ago arguing that there would be more black lawyers if law schools got rid of racial preferences.

In a blog post published on Wednesday for the John William Pope Center for Higher Education Policy, a conservative think tank, Mr. Sander laid out his take on where research on mismatch currently stands. “Only demagogues (of which there is, unfortunately, no shortage),” he wrote, “or people who haven’t read the relevant literature can still claim that mismatch is not a genuine problem.”

In an interview with The Chronicle, he noted that “mismatch has been really controversial,” but said “there’s an emerging consensus that this is a real thing.” The evidence is most compelling, Mr. Sander said, in two contexts. One is law school; the other, he said, is the sciences: Students who receive large preferences and who plan to study science have high attrition out of those majors. The preferences need not be based on race, Mr. Sander added — they could also be for athletes or legacies, for instance. And Mr. Sander lamented that the issue remained difficult to study because colleges kept their practices opaque.

Another scholar who’s studied mismatch had a decidedly different take, which he broadcast on Twitter:

Scalia clearly hasn’t read work debunking low-quality “mismatch” evidence, such as: https://t.co/xABfkgpF3D

— Matt Chingos (@chingos) December 9, 2015

Matthew M. Chingos, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute, was one of the authors of Crossing the Finish Line: Completing College at America’s Public Universities, a scholarly book based on research that found whatever students’ grades and test scores, they were more likely to graduate if they attended a more-selective college.

Mismatch is “not crazy-sounding in theory,” Mr. Chingos said in an interview. And there are circumstances under which it would happen: “If we took someone who couldn’t read, they’d be unlikely to succeed at Harvard.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Harvard, of course, has an admissions process, in part for that reason.

The serious question, Mr. Chingos said, is whether colleges’ affirmative-action policies admit students who are not likely to succeed there. “There is no high-quality empirical evidence in support of that hypothesis,” he said.

The basis for the second part of Justice Scalia’s comment, that “most of the black scientists in this country don’t come from schools like the University of Texas,” was not immediately clear. But he may have been referencing research showing that historically black colleges play an outsize role in producing African-American graduates who go on to earn doctorates in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

That point doesn’t quite connect to the mismatch one, Mr. Chingos said. He offered an analogy: Most Pell Grant recipients who earn bachelor’s degrees don’t get them from top colleges. That’s a question of enrollment patterns and volume. But a particular Pell-eligible student would still have a higher chance of graduating if he or she went to a more-selective college.

ADVERTISEMENT

Beckie Supiano writes about college affordability, the job market for new graduates, and professional schools, among other things. Follow her on Twitter @becksup, or drop her a line at beckie.supiano@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the December 18, 2015, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Supiano_Beckie.jpg
About the Author
Beckie Supiano
Beckie Supiano is a senior writer for The Chronicle of Higher Education, where she covers teaching, learning, and the human interactions that shape them. She is also a co-author of The Chronicle’s free, weekly Teaching newsletter that focuses on what works in and around the classroom. Email her at beckie.supiano@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Supreme Court Laments How Little It Really Knows About Race-Conscious Admissions
‘This Case Shouldn’t Be Here Again’: Activists Outside the Supreme Court on ‘Fisher’ and Race

More News

Harvard University
'Deeply Unsettling'
Harvard’s Battle With Trump Escalates as Research Money Is Suddenly Canceled
Photo-based illustration of a hand and a magnifying glass focusing on a scene from Western Carolina Universiy
Equal Opportunity
The Trump Administration Widens Its Scrutiny of Colleges, With Help From the Internet
Santa J. Ono, president of the University of Michigan, watches a basketball game on the campus in November 2022.
'He Is a Chameleon'
At U. of Michigan, Frustrations Grew Over a President Who Couldn’t Be Pinned Down
Photo-based illustration of University of Michigan's president Jeremy Santa Ono emerging from a red shape of Florida
Leadership
A Major College-President Transition Is Defined by an About-Face on DEI

From The Review

Illustration showing a valedictorian speaker who's tassel is a vintage microphone
The Review | Opinion
A Graduation Speaker Gets Canceled
By Corey Robin
Illustration showing a stack of coins and a university building falling over
The Review | Opinion
Here’s What Congress’s Endowment-Tax Plan Might Cost Your College
By Phillip Levine
Photo-based illustration of a college building under an upside down baby crib
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Must Stop Infantilizing Everyone
By Gregory Conti

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin