Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
The Review

A Crash Course in Crisis Communication

By David D. Perlmutter February 5, 2018
A few years ago, Graham Spanier of Penn State (left) and Lou Anna Simon of Michigan State (right) were seen as among the most successful college presidents. Their mishandling of crises led to their fall, showing that campus leadership isn’t just about what happens when all hell breaks loose — it’s about what happens long beforehand.
A few years ago, Graham Spanier of Penn State (left) and Lou Anna Simon of Michigan State (right) were seen as among the most successful college presidents. Their mishandling of crises led to their fall, showing that campus leadership isn’t just about what happens when all hell breaks loose — it’s about what happens long beforehand. Lorenzo Bevilaqua, ABC via Getty Images; Stephen Nowland, NCAA Photos via Getty Images

At a conference in 2011 I was talking with several higher-education administrators about who we thought were the most successful college presidents. Graham B. Spanier of Pennsylvania State and Lou Anna K. Simon of Michigan State were both mentioned. Now their legacies have been eclipsed by the one thing they did not immediately and aggressively stop: the harming of innocent young people.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

A few years ago, Graham Spanier of Penn State (left) and Lou Anna Simon of Michigan State (right) were seen as among the most successful college presidents. Their mishandling of crises led to their fall, showing that campus leadership isn’t just about what happens when all hell breaks loose — it’s about what happens long beforehand.
A few years ago, Graham Spanier of Penn State (left) and Lou Anna Simon of Michigan State (right) were seen as among the most successful college presidents. Their mishandling of crises led to their fall, showing that campus leadership isn’t just about what happens when all hell breaks loose — it’s about what happens long beforehand. Lorenzo Bevilaqua, ABC via Getty Images; Stephen Nowland, NCAA Photos via Getty Images

At a conference in 2011 I was talking with several higher-education administrators about who we thought were the most successful college presidents. Graham B. Spanier of Pennsylvania State and Lou Anna K. Simon of Michigan State were both mentioned. Now their legacies have been eclipsed by the one thing they did not immediately and aggressively stop: the harming of innocent young people.

Contrary to what you may have read, they fell not just because of a sclerotic bureaucracy, poisonous local sports cultures, CYA attitudes among administrators, or bad advice. They fell because they failed to pay heed to the essentials of crisis communication.

Here are some tips for avoiding their fate:

Appreciate how fast issues and news develop today. Colleges are known for the glacial pace of their decision making. Often that makes sense. A four-year curriculum should be vetted thoroughly before it is rolled out to thousands of students, and no worthwhile strategic plan can be conceived, written, and trotted out overnight. Woe to the dean or president who rams through major changes without getting buy-in from campus constituencies.

But those norms are fatal in a crisis: Events speed ahead of decision-making processes and protocols. In this era of internet and social media, colleges no longer have days to respond to a crisis; now, a student tweet can get viral attention and grab news headlines before the standing committee on student activities or the president’s cabinet is able to meet. At the same time, a reporter covering the event may shoot a text and, if a response is not received in minutes, post a story saying, “The president was unavailable for comment.”

Differentiate a real crisis from routine. Identify what actions, remarks, and events deserve immediate attention. A task may be important (finalizing the draft of a new strategic plan) or even urgent (a major federal grant proposal to be submitted by midnight). Each of those tasks might seem crucial, but they’re not crises. Is anybody in danger of being harmed? No? Then maybe it’s not a crisis.

Three victims of Larry Nassar — Kaylee Lorincz, Rachael Denhollander, and Lindsey Lemke — spoke in Lansing, Mich., in November 2017. Testimony by them and others at his sentencing hearing, in January 2018, undermined support for Michigan State’s president, Lou Anna K. Simon.
The Nassar Scandal and the Crisis of Michigan State’s President
Within a year the university lost two chief executives — Lou Anna K. Simon, sank by the scathing, heart-rending testimony of the sports doctor’s scores of victims, and John M. Engler, whose interim presidency ended amid a backlash over his bare-knuckled tactics.
  • With Criminal Charges Dismissed Against Michigan State’s Ex-President, Sex-Abuse Accountability Hits Skids Again
  • Michigan State’s Ex-President, Who Faces Criminal Charges, Will Retire With a $2.5-Million Payout
  • At Michigan State, a Disruptive Presidency That Few Could Muster the Will to End

For presidents at both Michigan State and Penn State, hearing that someone affiliated with the institution had been accused of harming children or young people should have precipitated a crisis mode: Drop everything, summon a team immediately, demand information, and act to protect people from harm. Above all, don’t use jargon or euphemisms. Sexual abuse is sexual abuse: It’s that simple.

Develop an intel monitoring system. You might think that a crisis would be easy to spot, yet too often college administrators appear hapless, flat-footed, and out of touch. Last August, when a large group of alt-right demonstrators marched on the University of Virginia campus, many students and faculty members knew (and worried about it) days beforehand, yet university officials were caught by surprise.

ADVERTISEMENT

The lesson: College leaders should learn from the example of many major corporations that have invested heavily in hardware and software to monitor the media in real time, manage pattern analytics, and more. Most colleges can’t afford 100-person social-media analytics teams, but they can monitor social media for trigger terms that provide early warnings that something is up.

Insist that anybody can leap the chain of command in a crisis. Communication is two way. I have a policy with the faculty, staff, and students in my college that I want to be the second person in the building to know anything is amiss. If anyone wonders, “Should the dean be aware of this?,” the answer is “Yes.” The results are admittedly spotty; there is tremendous inertia among most of us to report problems upward.

Moreover, I am just a dean; the reluctance of, say, a maintenance worker to call the president to tip her off about a serious problem in a dorm is understandable. At both Michigan State and Penn State, a “you will get in trouble for reporting trouble” attitude seemed pervasive — a true prescription for catastrophe. The antidote is for leaders not to insulate themselves. If presidents spend their days talking only to board members and vice presidents, they can’t be in touch with what is really happening at their institution.

Prepare a plan for every type of crisis; review, revise, and rehearse. Crises do not restrict themselves to business hours. Leaders who have little time to respond to a sudden crisis cannot start from scratch. Corporations and the military develop contingency crisis plans (including communication templates).

Leaders should be preparing a playbook for each plausible hypothetical and agree on a course of action.

The major crises that can happen on campuses publicly or internally are well known, so leaders should be preparing a playbook for each plausible hypothetical and agree on a course of action. They should reconsider and amend it every few months; when a crisis happens, they will have a choice of plans. And part of that planning should be to ensure that the bureaucracy suppresses its default mode.

ADVERTISEMENT

During the sentencing hearing for Larry Nassar, one victim said her family was still receiving bills for his services. A good crisis-communication plan — not to mention attentive leadership during a crisis — would have stopped that outrage long before.

Know when to go public and when to keep it private. Crisis communication is not conducted solely by press release. In the Michigan State and Penn State cases, what should have happened first was internal crisis-mode communication. The president hears about serious, horrible allegations. She or he should not let the usual committees and lawyers look into it for five months — or five years. Rather, the priority must be to assure that no one else comes to further or new harm. And subordinates must be held accountable.

When going public, do not be led by events. Crisis communication demands that you get ahead of the story. When a public response is necessary, the message must fit the facts, not confuse them. That’s where planning pays off: A slow response can itself become a hot-button issue. Cite plans for action, but do not necessarily draw conclusions yet. As James C. Garland, a former president of Miami University, in Ohio, wrote recently, just because somebody is demanding a certain type of response does not mean that’s the correct one. I feel the need to state what in the past was a cliché: Sometimes the accused are innocent; sometimes overreaction is worse than delay.

For leaders who want to save people from harm and uphold the honor and reputation of their institutions, not to mention keep their jobs, now is the time to plan for crises to come. They must emulate the best practices already in place in other industries that are intended to prevent crises or resolve them faster, and never hesitate to take charge of the situation — in word and in deed.

A version of this article appeared in the February 23, 2018, issue.
Read other items in The Nassar Scandal and the Crisis of Michigan State’s President.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Leadership & Governance Opinion Innovation & Transformation
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
David D. Perlmutter
About the Author
David D. Perlmutter
David D. Perlmutter is a professor in the College of Media & Communication at Texas Tech University. He stepped down as dean of the college in 2023 after holding the position since 2013. He writes the Admin 101 column for The Chronicle.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

After Nassar Conviction, Michigan State Goes on Trial
After Michigan State: ‘Could We Be Next?’
Inside the U. of Virginia’s Response to a Chaotic White-Supremacist Rally
Beyond a President’s Worst Fears, a Mob With Torches Arrived

More News

Graphic vector illustration of a ship with education-like embellishments being tossed on a black sea with a Kraken-esque elephant trunk ascending from the depth against a stormy red background.
Creeping concerns
Most Colleges Aren’t a Target of Trump (Yet). Here’s How Their Presidents Are Leading.
Photo-based illustration of calendars on a wall (July, August and September) with a red line marking through most of the dates
'A Creative Solution'
Facing Federal Uncertainty, Swarthmore Makes a Novel Plan: the 3-Month Budget
Marva Johnson is set to take the helm of Florida A&M University this summer.
Leadership & governance
‘Surprising': A DeSantis-Backed Lobbyist Is Tapped to Lead Florida A&M
Students and community members protest outside of Coffman Memorial Union at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, on Tuesday, April 23, 2024.
Campus Activism
One Year After the Encampments, Campuses Are Quieter and Quicker to Stop Protests

From The Review

Glenn Loury in Providence, R.I. on May 7, 2024.
The Review | Conversation
Glenn Loury on the ‘Barbarians at the Gates’
By Evan Goldstein, Len Gutkin
Illustration showing a valedictorian speaker who's tassel is a vintage microphone
The Review | Opinion
A Graduation Speaker Gets Canceled
By Corey Robin
Illustration showing a stack of coins and a university building falling over
The Review | Opinion
Here’s What Congress’s Endowment-Tax Plan Might Cost Your College
By Phillip Levine

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin