Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
A Clash of Faculty Letters

A Deep Rift Over Israel Divides Columbia’s Faculty

By Maggie Hicks November 1, 2023
Pro-Palestinian students take part in a protest in support of the Palestinians amid the ongoing conflict in Gaza, at Columbia University in New York City, October 12, 2023. (Jeenah Moon, Reuters, Redux)
Students at Columbia University hold a protest in support of Palestine amid the ongoing conflict in Gaza.Jeenah Moon, Reuters, Redux

The faculty at Columbia University engaged in a heated war of words this week, with hundreds of them signing letters in response to the Israel-Hamas war.

Since Hamas’s deadly attack in Israel on October 7, Columbia, like many colleges, has been in turmoil. An Israeli student was allegedly assaulted with a stick in front of Butler Library on October 11, four days after Hamas’s attack. The following day, Columbia closed its campus to the public in anticipation of protests over the war.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The faculty at Columbia University engaged in a heated war of words this week, with hundreds of them signing letters in response to the Israel-Hamas war.

Since Hamas’s deadly attack in Israel on October 7, Columbia, like many colleges, has been in turmoil. An Israeli student was allegedly assaulted with a stick in front of Butler Library on October 11, four days after Hamas’s attack. The following day, Columbia closed its campus to the public in anticipation of protests over the war. Students have reported finding swastikas drawn in campus buildings. Last week, a “doxxing truck” drove through campus displaying the images and names of members of organizations who had signed statements critical of Israel, labeling them “Columbia’s leading antisemites.”

On Monday, a group of more than 170 faculty members released a letter defending those students. “We feel compelled to respond to those who label our students antisemitic if they express empathy for the lives and dignity of Palestinians,” the letter says, linking to a pro-Palestinian statement signed by more than 20 student organizations (the students removed the names of the groups from the statement over safety concerns). The anonymous student statement places blame for the war on the Israeli government and defends Palestinian resistance movements.

“In our view, the student statement aims to recontextualize the events of October 7, 2023, pointing out that military operations and state violence did not begin that day,” the faculty letter says, “but rather it represented a military response by a people who had endured crushing and unrelenting state violence from an occupying power over many years.”

The faculty letter and those who signed it faced intense backlash, not least for characterizing Hamas’s attack as “military operations” and “a military response.”

If we can’t hold these uncomfortable conversations, then we’re abandoning a fundamental mission of what we do in universities.

“This letter is a disgrace,” wrote Jennifer La’O, an associate professor of economics at Columbia, on X. “I am disheartened and disappointed in my colleagues who have signed this.”

By late Monday night, another group of faculty members released a letter in response, condemning what it saw as an effort by colleagues to legitimize Hamas, “an organization that shares none of the university’s core values of democracy, human rights, or the rule of law.”

The clash of faculty letters demonstrated a deep divide at Columbia — one that has been growing for years. What looks to some like soft-pedaling the crimes of a terrorist organization looks to others like the principled protection of students’ right to political protest.

The initial faculty letter came together after Katherine M. Franke, a professor of law at Columbia, joined a group of students and faculty last week to protest the “doxxing truck” at the university by attempting to physically block the students’ faces displayed on it. That’s when she and her colleagues decided they needed to release a statement supporting the targeted students.

Open letter: defense of robust debate

01-letter-columbia.jpg

Read the letter (Google Doc)

Franke, a longtime proponent of an academic boycott against the Israeli government, said students supporting the Palestinian cause have faced “well-organized and violent” harassment. “There’s a real silencing that is the impact of what seems to be a very well-orchestrated campaign to punish them for expressing a view that is legitimate in any other quarter,” Franke said.

The letter from Franke and her colleagues opens by addressing students who have been “viciously targeted,” including losing job offers. Prominent law firms threatened employment for some pro-Palestinian Columbia students, though some of them may be reversing their decision.

ADVERTISEMENT

The letter goes on to defend the students’ statement, pointing out that it acknowledges both Israeli and Palestinian deaths.

“It is worth noting that not all of us agree with every one of the claims made in the students’ statement, but we do agree that making such claims cannot and should not be considered antisemitic,” the statement says. “Their merits are being debated by governmental and non-governmental agencies at the highest level, and constitute a terrain of completely legitimate political and legal debate.”

The letter is signed by several prominent Columbia faculty members, including Rashid Khalidi, Jack Halberstam, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, and Adam Tooze.

Halberstam, an English and gender-studies professor, said he’s received several “ugly” and “appalling” emails following the release of the statement. Halberstam said one email called him a “self-hating Jew,” while another stated that Hamas “wouldn’t hesitate” to kill him, since he is transgender.

Open letter: Hamas’s atrocities and the war

02-letter-columbia.jpg

Read letter (Google Doc)

To Halberstam, the faculty letter “was clear in its condemnation of the killing and torture of civilians by Hamas,” while also providing context to the reasons behind the violence.

“The overall goal here is to educate, to think carefully about the long histories of violence that have created our current crises and a concern for open discussion,” Halberstam said in an email statement. “The letter was crafted by people who have studied the history of Israel and the occupation of Palestinian Territories and it deserves to be taken seriously and read carefully at a time when inflammatory rhetoric floods the public sphere.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The signatories of the letter faced criticism online for not focusing on another, more radical statement from the campus chapters of Students for Justice in Palestine and Jewish Voice for Peace. That statement, which the organizations released on October 9, does not acknowledge Israeli deaths and refers to Hamas’s October 7 attack as a “historic moment for the Palestinians of Gaza.”

Franke said many of the incidents targeting pro-Palestinian students were referencing the anonymous statement, which is why the first faculty letter addressed it.

The aim of the faculty letter was to ensure that students don’t feel alone, Franke said, and to foster a productive discussion rather than a polarizing one. “If we can’t hold these uncomfortable conversations, then we’re abandoning a fundamental mission of what we do in universities.”

Where the two faculty letters agree is on the need for “robust debate” about the war, and a university climate free of fear and intimidation. From there, they part ways.

David M. Schizer, one of the organizers of the counter-letter and a former dean of Columbia’s law school, said the language in the first faculty letter “doubled down” on defending Hamas.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Hamas’s genocidal atrocities are indefensible, regardless of what one thinks of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,” Schizer said in an email statement. “As our letter emphasizes, we are committed to free speech. But this means that speech should be answered with speech.”

We are committed to free speech. But this means that speech should be answered with speech.

To Shai Davidai, an assistant professor in the management division at Columbia’s business school and one of the signers of the second letter, incidents like the “doxxing truck” shouldn’t be denounced since it was exposing those who signed a public statement. Students have a right to free speech, Davidai said, but they should also expect to face consequences for that speech.

“Students and professors throughout the country have forgotten that they are full-fledged adults,” Davidai said. “If they are not ashamed to say these vile things, then they should also be willing to bear the social consequences.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Davidai, who is Israeli and has not been in his office since October 7, said he was planning to return this week but decided against it after reading the initial faculty statement. Though he supports the two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict and sees himself as pro-Palestinian, he said he doesn’t feel safe in an environment with the professors who signed the first statement.

“It just broke my heart that these are professors. Several of the people that are signatories are people that I know, people that I have had coffee with, people that are, in everything else in their lives, well-meaning, good people,” he said.

This latest war of words isn’t the first time in recent years that Columbia faculty members have clashed over the Middle East.

Earlier this year, Franke and several colleagues wrote a letter in opposition to the university’s plan to open a new center in Tel Aviv. In response, several faculty members, including some who signed the counter-letter this week, released a statement in support of the Tel Aviv center. In 2019, the university faced similar faculty criticism after forming a partnership with an Israeli college to offer a dual-degree program in computer science.

ADVERTISEMENT

Both of this week’s letters, though, concluded with a similar sentiment: The university administration needs to step up.

For Franke and other signatories of the first letter, Columbia hasn’t provided the same support to Palestinian and pro-Palestinian students that it has to Israeli and Jewish students. The statement concludes by calling on leadership, other faculty members, alumni, and potential employers to condemn “the vicious targeting of our students with doxxing, public shaming, surveillance by members of our community, including other students, and reprisals from employers.”

The counter-letter calls on the university to protect all students, including those in the Jewish community. It concludes by condemning “any bigoted comments or acts directed at Palestinian and Muslim students,” while condemning several recent antisemitic incidents on campus.

“In the same way that the university defends other groups from this sort of disgusting conduct, it is essential to do the same for Jewish and Israeli students,” the letter says. “To do otherwise would betray our ideals and the values of Columbia as a great university.”

On Wednesday the presidents of Columbia and Barnard College, its sister institution, announced the creation of a task force to combat antisemitism, “this ancient, but terribly resilient, form of hatred,” their statement said. The task force will be led by Schizer, along with Nicholas Lemann and Esther Fuchs, lead authors of the counter-letter, which has garnered more than 400 faculty signatures.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Correction (Nov. 2, 2023, 11:26 a.m.): This article originally mentioned that students reported finding swastikas drawn in a professor’s office. The time of this incident was misstated. It occurred in 2018. The mention has been removed.
Tags
Political Influence & Activism
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Maggie-Hicks-Promo.png
About the Author
Maggie Hicks
Maggie Hicks is a reporting fellow at The Chronicle of Higher Education. Follow her on Twitter @maggie_hickss, or email her at maggie.hicks@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits
Photo illustration showing a figurine of a football player with a large price tag on it.
Athletics
Loans, Fees, and TV Money: Where Colleges Are Finding the Funds to Pay Athletes
Photo illustration of a donation jar turned on it's side, with coins spilling out.
Access & Affordability
Congressional Republicans Want to End Grad PLUS Loans. How Might It Affect Your Campus?
Florida Commissioner of Education Manny Diaz, Jr. delivers remarks during the State Board of Education meeting at Winter Park High School, Wednesday, March 27, 2024.
Executive Privilege
In Florida, University Presidents’ Pay Goes Up. Is Politics to Blame?

From The Review

Photo-based illustration of a tentacle holding a microscope
The Review | Essay
In Defense of ‘Silly’ Science
By Carly Anne York
Illustration showing a graduate's hand holding a college diploma and another hand but a vote into a ballot box
The Review | Essay
Civics Education Is Back. It Shouldn’t Belong to Conservatives.
By Timothy Messer-Kruse
Photo-based illustration of a hedges shaped like dollar signs in various degrees of having been over-trimmed by a shadowed Donald Trump figure carrying hedge trimmers.
The Review | Essay
What Will Be Left of Higher Ed in Four Years?
By Brendan Cantwell

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: A Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin