Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
The Review

A Different Kind of Diversity

By Sheila J. Nayar September 17, 2017

I am being interviewed for a position as a humanities professor at a private, well-to-do liberal-arts college. I have sufficiently anticipated many of the committee’s questions. But then comes this one: “How do you feel about diversity?”

I’m silent, I’m searching; frankly, I’m baffled.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

I am being interviewed for a position as a humanities professor at a private, well-to-do liberal-arts college. I have sufficiently anticipated many of the committee’s questions. But then comes this one: “How do you feel about diversity?”

I’m silent, I’m searching; frankly, I’m baffled.

I blunder my way through my answer — not because I am anti-diversity (you meet few such people in the humanities today), but because the last time I underwent a job interview of this sort, more than 15 years ago, the culture was such that I wondered (though never would have asked), “Are you OK with diversity?”

My father is an immigrant from India; my mother a blonde, blue-eyed Midwesterner. And while both have Ph.D.s, my paternal grandmother grew up in a village in the Punjab and never learned to read or write. Additionally, my mother is Roman Catholic, while the entire side of my father’s family is Hindu. Growing up, I heard “mixed-blood” gibes from both sides of my family. I recall many times wondering how I would fill out those minuscule boxes in which you ticked your way to an identity. What was I going to be: Caucasian, Asian, Other? Then again, growing up, I was often assigned my identity by my peers: darkie, Paki, raghead — and once beaten up for it.

2017-Diversity-Issue
Diversity in Academe: The Age Issue
Welcome to The Chronicle’s first special report devoted to age diversity on campuses. This annual issue also features compelling personal essays dealing with identity and disability — be sure to check them out.
  • How Older Students Can Enrich Your Classroom
  • How Generations X, Y, and Z May Change the Academic Workplace
  • These Tech-Savvy Professors Have Gray Hair
  • Want to Help Underrepresented Students? Be Quiet and Listen
  • The Free-Speech Divide Is a Generation Gap

But I’m not in search of empathy here. The fact is, I have lived a life of economic privilege. Rather, I want, without kowtowing to knee-jerk political correctness, to wrestle with the real and radical complexity of the diversity question. What did it mean that I was being asked how I felt about diversity? And how was I to answer without having to trot out — prostitute-like, in my mind — my own diversity? Besides, there are far too many constituents packed into that catchword. Was it possible that by their putting the onus on a candidate (one shrewder than I), the questioners meant to elicit discussion of race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disabilities? Thus would everyone be able to skirt the elephant in the room — namely, the lack of socioeconomic diversity at such institutions.

First, let me say that campus inclusiveness worthily pivots on helping students feel accepted and comfortable with wearing their identities on their sleeves (or on their heads, or around their necks) — or, because they have no choice, in the color of their skin. But this sort of promoted diversity also glosses over the relative uniformity among students at elite colleges when it comes to grades, intellectual aptitude, and writing abilities as demonstrated in admission essays. Subscribing to this sort of inclusiveness disguises the economic truths underpinning such colleges and what it typically takes to join the “elite": exorbitant tuition; high SAT scores, often anchored in private or prep-school education; extracurricular lessons in piano, or lacrosse, or Mandarin; and possibly a stint volunteering with an NGO in Bangladesh — all proving that one is cultured/athletic/dedicated to serving humanity. (There are, of course, exceptions, which is why students who have defied the socioeconomic odds always seem to generate a press release.)

At the same time, those to whom one might point as exemplars of such an institution’s admirable diversity are, more likely than not, also the daughters and sons of professionals: lawyers, scientists, business executives, physicians, politicians. I don’t say this without discomfort, given the ugly wave of anti-multicultural vitriol that has recently cast a pall across large swaths of the globe and the United States in particular. But when colleges tout their progressive institutional stance on diversity — or, rather, want you, as their representative, to do so — one has to wonder if they are doing so in part to deflect from the relative affluence of their student bodies.

R ecently, while teaching at a flagship public university in the South, I found that the students most likely to be identified as “diverse” often appeared far more comfortable with their academic environs than did those who had grown up firmly entrenched in the culture of the rural South. In some sense, this latter group struck me as the real minority group (and one that truly added diversity), given that they had worked their way into that flagship institution despite their often underfunded schooling, their noncosmopolitan upbringing, and even their accents, which on occasion now elicited self-consciousness.

Could it be that those of us who wear our diversity markers with a proud and even defiant air do so as a tacit or unwitting means of making amends for our own economic privilege?

But I am not drawing from personal experience alone. Much of my academic research has focused on ways of knowing distinct from those shaped by one’s intense immersion in an alphabetically literate culture. (Recall my grandmother, who, in spite of living into the 21st century, navigated the world without the written word — and so relied completely on those around her for oral acquisition of information, instructions, directions, and advice.) As for the even more demanding traits of “high” or “critical literacy,” these require years of tutelage and practice — and access to top-tier resources and experts who can help one build up “cultural capital.”

ADVERTISEMENT

High literacy additionally comprises the sort of cognitive skills that elite colleges expect: dedication to parsing ambiguity, appreciating nuance, and recognizing multiple points of view, and, when it comes to writing, to using the sort of sophisticated sentence structure and diction one would rarely use in speaking. But, again, the acquisition of these skills hinges on a preparatory scaffolding that often begins in one’s youth. And then there is this related paradox: How, exactly, is any such institution expected to commit to, and genuinely promote, socioeconomic diversity, when a major goal of college is the jettisoning of that particular diversity from its graduating ranks?

How was I to answer a question about my feelings on diversity without having to trot out, prostitute-like my own diversity?

There is an additional, painful Catch-22 — and here I willingly hoist myself with my own petard. My scholarship on alternative ways of knowing — bound with my own personal ambitions — compels me to want to be identified with the most selective institution possible. Affiliation, after all, is one of the swiftest (and most brutal) ways by which one’s status as a contributor to the culture of learning is adjudicated. More importantly, such affiliation ensures access to exceptional resources, both material and financial, as well as to safeguarded time for the pursuit and cultivation of research.

So, if there is a potential duplicity — perhaps even a veiled self-congratulation — inherent in any elite college’s diversity question, it is not one that any prospective candidate would dare disrobe. Let us imagine, though, that I was to be interviewed tomorrow by just such an institution, and had decided to answer with complete candor when asked the question: “How do you feel about diversity?” Here is what I would have to say:

ADVERTISEMENT

“I fully support diversity and your institution’s embrace of it. Of course, your institution’s diversity is no less exclusionary than it is inclusive. But, then, that is why I want so ardently to join you.”

Sheila J. Nayar is a professor of English, communication, and media studies at Greensboro College. She is working on a book on the nature of narrative before the written word.

A version of this article appeared in the September 22, 2017, issue.
Read other items in Diversity in Academe: The Age Issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

How Colleges Are Strangling Liberalism
What Mark Lilla Gets Wrong About Students
Making Diversity Not the Work of One Office, but a Campuswide Priority

More News

Illustration of a magnifying glass highlighting the phrase "including the requirements set forth in Presidential Executive Order 14168 titled Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government."
Policy 'Whiplash'
Research Grants Increasingly Require Compliance With Trump’s Orders. Here’s How Colleges Are Responding.
Photo illustration showing internal email text snippets over a photo of a University of Iowa campus quad
Red-state reticence
Facing Research Cuts, Officials at U. of Iowa Spoke of a ‘Limited Ability to Publicly Fight This’
Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues

From The Review

Illustration showing a graduate's hand holding a college diploma and another hand but a vote into a ballot box
The Review | Essay
Civics Education Is Back. It Shouldn’t Belong to Conservatives.
By Timothy Messer-Kruse
Photo-based illustration of a hedges shaped like dollar signs in various degrees of having been over-trimmed by a shadowed Donald Trump figure carrying hedge trimmers.
The Review | Essay
What Will Be Left of Higher Ed in Four Years?
By Brendan Cantwell
Football game between UCLA and Colorado University, at Folsom Field in Boulder, Colo., Sept. 24, 2022.
The Review | Opinion
My University Values Football More Than Education
By Sigman Byrd

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: A Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin