Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
The Digital Campus

A Digital Boot Camp for Grad Students in the Humanities

By Bethany Nowviskie April 29, 2012
A Digital Boot Camp for Grad Students in the Humanities 1
Chad Hagen for The Chronicle

From any angle, it’s easy to see: This is no ordinary humanities seminar.

Our graduate students’ first task was not to consult a pre-made syllabus, but to draft their own charter—a document to guide our working relationships and govern the ways the scholarship we’d produce together should move outward, into the wider world. Two semesters later, they won’t hand in typical papers or jotted bluebooks, nor will their final tasks feel imbued with finality at all. A budding Victorianist will revise a line or two of code and commit it to an open-source repository. A student of medieval architecture will nervously scan our social-media streams: Is there a question to be answered? A problem we’ve failed to address? Their peers will push buttons that publish, to an audience of thousands, a few more reflections and designs, or execute commands to deploy our joint creation to the Web. Then we’ll all stand up—students, librarians, and software developers alike—and welcome the next team through the door.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

From any angle, it’s easy to see: This is no ordinary humanities seminar.

Our graduate students’ first task was not to consult a pre-made syllabus, but to draft their own charter—a document to guide our working relationships and govern the ways the scholarship we’d produce together should move outward, into the wider world. Two semesters later, they won’t hand in typical papers or jotted bluebooks, nor will their final tasks feel imbued with finality at all. A budding Victorianist will revise a line or two of code and commit it to an open-source repository. A student of medieval architecture will nervously scan our social-media streams: Is there a question to be answered? A problem we’ve failed to address? Their peers will push buttons that publish, to an audience of thousands, a few more reflections and designs, or execute commands to deploy our joint creation to the Web. Then we’ll all stand up—students, librarians, and software developers alike—and welcome the next team through the door.


BROWSE THE FULL ISSUE: News and Commentary
BUY A COPY: Digital and Print Editions at the Chronicle Store


Last August, on a shoestring budget, the faculty and staff of the Scholars’ Lab—the digital humanities center I direct at the University of Virginia Library—launched the Praxis Program. Praxis, which has since garnered two-year support from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, is a digital-methods workshop and competitively awarded, yearlong, paid apprenticeship, designed to train emerging scholars and tech-savvy knowledge workers in the humanities.

Our goal is to provide a small team of graduate students with soup-to-nuts training in software development for humanities research and exchange. Along the way, they will gain hands-on experience in knowledge representation and design: the most fundamental, formal activities underlying the production of digital scholarship. It’s pretty geeky stuff—but our students also exercise so-called softer skills. They learn to collaborate effectively across disciplinary borders and class lines in the academy, and with practitioners from profoundly different intellectual traditions. They plan and manage projects with aggressive timelines, complex moving parts, and personnel who are also peers (including not only fellow students, but librarians and information-technology professionals). And they hone their ability to communicate—to scholars, to potential supporters, and to a broad and public audience.

One challenge facing our students also confronts others new to the rapidly expanding digital humanities (in fact a 60-year-old community of practice until recently called it “humanities computing”). How can scholars who have up to now been selected and rewarded almost exclusively for their facility in argument engage effectively with the most audacious contribution of the field? The great project of humanities computing is the development of a hermeneutic—a concept and practice of interpretation—parallel to that of the dominant, postwar, theory-driven humanities: a way of performing cultural and aesthetic criticism less through solitary points of view expressed in language, and more in team-based acts of building.

Products of digital work in the humanities are evident all around us, but the arguments that they instantiate remain deceptively tacit to those who have not learned to appreciate their sites of discourse, their languages and protocols. Humanities-computing arguments are made collectively and tested iteratively. The field advances through craft and construction: the fashioning and refashioning of digital architectures and artifacts. It is little wonder that bibliographers, archivists and textual critics, and archaeologists and other specialists in material culture were the first to grasp the implications of digital technology for humanities scholarship. Methodological, embodied, and quiet knowledge transfer lies at the heart of our work, which can remain frustratingly illegible to scholars whose experience rests more in verbal exchange.

The Praxis Program joins another offering of the Scholars’ Lab: our Graduate Fellowships in the Digital Humanities, through which we have financed, advised, and provided technical training to nearly two dozen emerging scholars in a range of disciplines over the past five years. Like Praxis, these fellowships are designed to foster a vibrant and intellectually diverse digital-humanities community—offering, well, fellowship alongside consultation and cash. But they are intended for late-stage dissertation writers and are awarded on the traditional model of individual merit. This means that, while highly innovative, our grad fellows’ digital projects augment private research and (unlike the shared work of the Praxis Program) are invariably theirs, alone. Only rarely does a project see the light of day before it has been shaped and polished and positioned perfectly, like a hoarded, highly valued gem.

Such solitary sparkle comes not by choice alone, nor is it a reflection of the ethos of the Scholars’ Lab. Our fellowship winners are motivated to align their digital productions with time-honored publishing practices from print scholarship and with longstanding customs in the evaluation of humanities scholars as individuals, for the granting of degrees, tenure, and promotion in rank. Most of us who work full-time in the Scholars’ Lab received our own graduate training in this tradition. We value it, just as we value the solo contributions of the humanities faculty our fellows emulate. But it feels increasingly alien to the collaborative and publicly iterative modes in which we and our colleagues at other digital centers now operate to produce and disseminate knowledge.

The Praxis Program, on the other hand, admits six students at a time. They form a single, interdisciplinary team with a variety of complementary strengths and diverse perspectives. While also winners of Scholars’ Lab fellowships, these humanities students are much more likely to be at early stages in their graduate careers. They join us not to refine a private interpretation or instantiate a predetermined argument in digital form, but to become co-creators and systems-builders. They seek a kind of pragmatic digital-methods training and shared, journeyman learning experience difficult to find in traditional graduate coursework. We hope they will leave better prepared to teach and do research as faculty members who are producers—not just critics—of new media. And we expect some of them will blaze trails off the tenure track, as knowledge-workers in alternative academic careers (the fostering of which provides higher education’s best chance to keep a generation of passionate humanities scholars productively employed in arts, letters, and cultural institutions).

It is fitting that our first Praxis team christened its yearlong practicum project “Prism.” Together, we are building a Web-based tool for collective annotation, done by color-coding passages from literary and historical documents. In its initial form, Prism’s texts will range from Jefferson to Joyce, with stops at Edgar Allan Poe and Dr. Seuss along the way. Users of the tool share a painterly palette with which they can highlight a common set of documents, offering their own interpretations according to constrained, shared vocabularies.

This is not a device for rich, individual exegesis. Its expressive power becomes evident only at scale, when the individual markings of many readers—students, scholars, an interested public—are compiled, analyzed, and visualized, generating spectra of similarity and difference. In this, our students mount a fundamental challenge to notions of “crowdsourcing” as they have become prevalent in the digital humanities: They treat the crowd not as a source of labor (for, say, transcription of hard-to-read manuscripts or correction of errors in mass-digitized books), but as a community of readers, whose divergent and congruent interpretations of texts may themselves be read computationally.

ADVERTISEMENT

Our Praxis team is part of that community. We develop and reveal our own arguments about humanities interpretation in the construction of Prism itself. In other words, we are consciously fashioning an instrument through which new observations and interpretations will be made. The software is on track for a beta release at the end of this academic year. Next year’s team will likely extend the tool, adding more provocative visualizations and using its crowdsourced data to mine large textual corpora, like Google Books. In this way, we can leverage human intelligence to refine algorithms that permit us to read computationally, at a distance. This is not a replacement of close reading, but rather a new employment of it—for the purpose of drawing scholarly attention to neglected texts and eliciting interpretations.

Like the scholarly tool we are building, our work in the Praxis Program is public and iterative, an exercise played out individually and collectively. There are no polished jewels here: Our students are cobbling together a framework for future scholarship even as the warts-and-all mandate of our charter drives them to fashion, for themselves, hybrid scholarly identities as newly refractive and contextual as anything on the Web. The digital-humanities community values process as much as product, so we’re sharing everything as we go: the software we’re building, our students’ reflections on the experience, and our curriculum as this year’s practicum shapes it, at praxis.scholarslab.org. Also under way, with support from UVa’s Scholarly Communication Institute, is the creation of an international Praxis Network. This effort will spotlight like-minded departmental and extracurricular digital-humanities apprenticeship programs, willing to share materials and articulate possible institutional models for training the next generation of humanities scholars.

None of these model programs will be set out as gems to admire, but rather as lenses to position—providing outlooks on a field always prismatic and a little blurred.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Technology
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin