Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Student Housing
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Excerpts From the Investigation

A Guide to the Penn State Investigation

July 12, 2012
July 12, 2012

A Guide to the Penn State Investigation

Help annotate the report
Tell us which passages you think are important.
Share your insights
Full document: Freeh Report on The Pennsylvania State University

The Freeh Report was released at 9 a.m. Thursday, July 12. Chronicle reporters annotated the report, providing insights on what the Freeh Group found, who it implicated, and what it means for the university. Complete coverage.

Page 15


View this page

Spanier and Board Failed in Their Duties, Report Says

The report is unwavering in its condemnation of the university’s two highest levels of leadership: the president and the Board of Trustees. “By not promptly and fully advising the Board of Trustees about the 1998 and 2001 child sexual abuse allegations against Sandusky and the subsequent Grand Jury investigation of him, Spanier failed in his duties as President,” the report says. “The Board also failed in its duties to oversee the President and senior University officials in 1998 and 2001 by not inquiring about important University matters and by not creating an environment where senior University officials felt accountable.”

The most powerful leaders in the university concealed facts and failed to protect children, primarily because they hoped to “avoid bad publicity,” the report finds. But other factors contributed as well, according to the committee. Specifically, the report blames “A culture of reverence for the football program that is ingrained at all levels of the campus community.”

Page 40


View this page

Coaches Saw Sandusky Shower With Boys Before 1998

Several Penn State staff members and football coaches regularly saw Sandusky showering with young boys in a Penn State locker building before May 1998, the report says. “None of the individuals interviewed notified their superiors of this behavior,” the report says. One former coach, Richard Anderson, told investigators he often saw Mr. Sandusky with children in the showers, but that he didn’t think the practice was improper.

Pages 47-50


View this page

In 1998, Vice President Schultz Feared ‘Pandora’s Box’

On May 3, 1998, Jerry Sandusky groped an 11-year-old boy in a Penn State athletic facility, the report says. The boy’s mother reported the incident to a Penn State psychologist and to Penn State police, who informed a Penn State vice president, Gary Schultz. Confidential notes from Mr. Schultz indicate that he was aware of the gravity of the situation. “Behavior - at best inappropriate @ worst sexual improprieties,” one note says. Two days after the incident, additional notes from Mr. Schultz say that a second boy had told police a similar story: “Locker room. Wrestling. Kissed on head. Hugging from behind in shower.” The notes end with questions: “Is this the opening of pandora’s box? Other children?”

Police later determined that there was no criminal behavior established and that the matter was closed, the report says. On June 9, 1998, Mr. Schultz wrote in an email to Penn State’s athletic director that “I think the matter has been appropriately investigated and I hope it is now behind us.”

Page 57


View this page

If Not For 2nd Mile, Sandusky Could Have Been Head Coach, Paterno Apparently Wrote

Investigators discovered notes that “appear to be in Paterno’s handwriting” related to Jerry Sandusky’s retirement from Penn State in 1999. “We know this isn’t easy for you and it isn’t easy for us or Penn State,” the notes say. “If there were no 2nd Mile then I believe you belief [sic] that you probably could be the next Penn State FB Coach. But you wanted the best of two worlds and I probably should have sat down with you six or seven years ago and said look Jerry if you want to be the Head Coach at Penn State, give up your association with the 2nd Mile and concentrate on nothing but your family and Penn State.”

Page 65


View this page

Janitors Who Observed Assault in 2000 Feared Retaliation

In fall 2000, a Penn State janitor saw Jerry Sandusky performing oral sex on a young boy in the Assistant Coaches’ locker room, the report says. On the same night, another janitor saw Mr. Sandusky showering with a young boy. The two janitors reported the incident to a superior, the report says. But one of the janitors said they should keep quiet, or “they’ll get rid of all of us.” The other janitor told investigators that reporting the incident “would have been like going against the President of the United States in my eyes.” He added that “football runs this university.”

Page 75


View this page

Spanier: Limited Response to Reports of 2001 Incident Was ‘Humane Way to Proceed’

In February 2001, after speaking with Joe Paterno, Athletic Director Tim Curley proposed changing the administration’s response to the report Jerry Sandusky had abused a boy in a Penn State locker room. Instead of talking to 2nd Mile and the state Department of Welfare, Mr. Curley proposed meeting with Mr. Sandusky first. “I think I would be more comfortable meeting with the person and tell him about the information we received.” In an e-mail response, Penn State President Graham Spanier said the approach “is acceptable to me.” He said he admired Mr. Curley’s willingness to have a difficult conversation with Mr. Sandusky. “The only downside for us is if the message isn’t ‘heard’ and acted upon, and we then become vulnerable for not having reported it,” Mr. Spanier wrote. “But that can be assessed down the road. The approach you outline is humane and a reasonable way to proceed.”

Page 110


View this page

Penn State Officials Failed to Issue Clery Act Report

Joe Paterno, Tim Curley, and Mike McQueary “were obligated to report the 2001 Sandusky incident to the University Police Department for inclusion in Clery Act statistics and for determining whether a timely warning should be issued to the University community.” But no record exists of such a report, the investigation says. The officials “should have ensured that the University was compliant with the Clery Act with regard to this incident,” the investigation says.

Help annotate the Freeh Report: tell us which passages you think are important. Share your insights

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

July 12, 2012

A Guide to the Penn State Investigation

Help annotate the report
Tell us which passages you think are important.
Share your insights
Full document: Freeh Report on The Pennsylvania State University

The Freeh Report was released at 9 a.m. Thursday, July 12. Chronicle reporters annotated the report, providing insights on what the Freeh Group found, who it implicated, and what it means for the university. Complete coverage.

Page 15


View this page

Spanier and Board Failed in Their Duties, Report Says

The report is unwavering in its condemnation of the university’s two highest levels of leadership: the president and the Board of Trustees. “By not promptly and fully advising the Board of Trustees about the 1998 and 2001 child sexual abuse allegations against Sandusky and the subsequent Grand Jury investigation of him, Spanier failed in his duties as President,” the report says. “The Board also failed in its duties to oversee the President and senior University officials in 1998 and 2001 by not inquiring about important University matters and by not creating an environment where senior University officials felt accountable.”

The most powerful leaders in the university concealed facts and failed to protect children, primarily because they hoped to “avoid bad publicity,” the report finds. But other factors contributed as well, according to the committee. Specifically, the report blames “A culture of reverence for the football program that is ingrained at all levels of the campus community.”

Page 40


View this page

Coaches Saw Sandusky Shower With Boys Before 1998

Several Penn State staff members and football coaches regularly saw Sandusky showering with young boys in a Penn State locker building before May 1998, the report says. “None of the individuals interviewed notified their superiors of this behavior,” the report says. One former coach, Richard Anderson, told investigators he often saw Mr. Sandusky with children in the showers, but that he didn’t think the practice was improper.

Pages 47-50


View this page

In 1998, Vice President Schultz Feared ‘Pandora’s Box’

On May 3, 1998, Jerry Sandusky groped an 11-year-old boy in a Penn State athletic facility, the report says. The boy’s mother reported the incident to a Penn State psychologist and to Penn State police, who informed a Penn State vice president, Gary Schultz. Confidential notes from Mr. Schultz indicate that he was aware of the gravity of the situation. “Behavior - at best inappropriate @ worst sexual improprieties,” one note says. Two days after the incident, additional notes from Mr. Schultz say that a second boy had told police a similar story: “Locker room. Wrestling. Kissed on head. Hugging from behind in shower.” The notes end with questions: “Is this the opening of pandora’s box? Other children?”

Police later determined that there was no criminal behavior established and that the matter was closed, the report says. On June 9, 1998, Mr. Schultz wrote in an email to Penn State’s athletic director that “I think the matter has been appropriately investigated and I hope it is now behind us.”

Page 57


View this page

If Not For 2nd Mile, Sandusky Could Have Been Head Coach, Paterno Apparently Wrote

Investigators discovered notes that “appear to be in Paterno’s handwriting” related to Jerry Sandusky’s retirement from Penn State in 1999. “We know this isn’t easy for you and it isn’t easy for us or Penn State,” the notes say. “If there were no 2nd Mile then I believe you belief [sic] that you probably could be the next Penn State FB Coach. But you wanted the best of two worlds and I probably should have sat down with you six or seven years ago and said look Jerry if you want to be the Head Coach at Penn State, give up your association with the 2nd Mile and concentrate on nothing but your family and Penn State.”

Page 65


View this page

Janitors Who Observed Assault in 2000 Feared Retaliation

In fall 2000, a Penn State janitor saw Jerry Sandusky performing oral sex on a young boy in the Assistant Coaches’ locker room, the report says. On the same night, another janitor saw Mr. Sandusky showering with a young boy. The two janitors reported the incident to a superior, the report says. But one of the janitors said they should keep quiet, or “they’ll get rid of all of us.” The other janitor told investigators that reporting the incident “would have been like going against the President of the United States in my eyes.” He added that “football runs this university.”

Page 75


View this page

Spanier: Limited Response to Reports of 2001 Incident Was ‘Humane Way to Proceed’

In February 2001, after speaking with Joe Paterno, Athletic Director Tim Curley proposed changing the administration’s response to the report Jerry Sandusky had abused a boy in a Penn State locker room. Instead of talking to 2nd Mile and the state Department of Welfare, Mr. Curley proposed meeting with Mr. Sandusky first. “I think I would be more comfortable meeting with the person and tell him about the information we received.” In an e-mail response, Penn State President Graham Spanier said the approach “is acceptable to me.” He said he admired Mr. Curley’s willingness to have a difficult conversation with Mr. Sandusky. “The only downside for us is if the message isn’t ‘heard’ and acted upon, and we then become vulnerable for not having reported it,” Mr. Spanier wrote. “But that can be assessed down the road. The approach you outline is humane and a reasonable way to proceed.”

Page 110


View this page

Penn State Officials Failed to Issue Clery Act Report

Joe Paterno, Tim Curley, and Mike McQueary “were obligated to report the 2001 Sandusky incident to the University Police Department for inclusion in Clery Act statistics and for determining whether a timely warning should be issued to the University community.” But no record exists of such a report, the investigation says. The officials “should have ensured that the University was compliant with the Clery Act with regard to this incident,” the investigation says.

Help annotate the Freeh Report: tell us which passages you think are important. Share your insights
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Athletics
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Protesters gather outside the Department of Education headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 14, 2025 to protest the Trump administrations cuts at the agency.
An Uncertain Future
The Education Department Got a Green Light to Shrink. Here Are 3 Questions About What’s Next.
Susie West and Dianne Davis-Keening, U of M Extension SuperShelf coordinators.
A 'Connector' Severed
Congress Cut a Federal Nutrition Program, Jeopardizing Campus Jobs and Community Services
PPP 10 FINAL promo.jpg
Bouncing Back?
For Once, Public Confidence in Higher Ed Has Increased
University of California, Berkeley chancellor Dr. Rich Lyons, testifies at a Congressional hearing on antisemitism, in Washington, D.C., U.S., on July 15, 2025. It is the latest in a series of House hearings on antisemitism at the university level, one that critics claim is a convenient way for Republicans to punish universities they consider too liberal or progressive, thereby undermining responses to hate speech and hate crimes. (Photo by Allison Bailey/NurPhoto via AP)
Another Congressional Hearing
3 College Presidents Went to Congress. Here’s What They Talked About.

From The Review

Photo-based illustration with repeated images of a student walking, in the pattern of a graph trending down, then up.
The Review | Opinion
7 Ways Community Colleges Can Boost Enrollment
By Bob Levey
Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin