> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Excerpts From the Investigation
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

A Guide to the Penn State Investigation

July 12, 2012
July 12, 2012

A Guide to the Penn State Investigation

Help annotate the report
Tell us which passages you think are important.
Share your insights
Full document: Freeh Report on The Pennsylvania State University

The Freeh Report was released at 9 a.m. Thursday, July 12. Chronicle reporters annotated the report, providing insights on what the Freeh Group found, who it implicated, and what it means for the university. Complete coverage.

Page 15


View this page

Spanier and Board Failed in Their Duties, Report Says

The report is unwavering in its condemnation of the university’s two highest levels of leadership: the president and the Board of Trustees. “By not promptly and fully advising the Board of Trustees about the 1998 and 2001 child sexual abuse allegations against Sandusky and the subsequent Grand Jury investigation of him, Spanier failed in his duties as President,” the report says. “The Board also failed in its duties to oversee the President and senior University officials in 1998 and 2001 by not inquiring about important University matters and by not creating an environment where senior University officials felt accountable.”

The most powerful leaders in the university concealed facts and failed to protect children, primarily because they hoped to “avoid bad publicity,” the report finds. But other factors contributed as well, according to the committee. Specifically, the report blames “A culture of reverence for the football program that is ingrained at all levels of the campus community.”

Page 40


View this page

Coaches Saw Sandusky Shower With Boys Before 1998

Several Penn State staff members and football coaches regularly saw Sandusky showering with young boys in a Penn State locker building before May 1998, the report says. “None of the individuals interviewed notified their superiors of this behavior,” the report says. One former coach, Richard Anderson, told investigators he often saw Mr. Sandusky with children in the showers, but that he didn’t think the practice was improper.

Pages 47-50


View this page

In 1998, Vice President Schultz Feared ‘Pandora’s Box’

On May 3, 1998, Jerry Sandusky groped an 11-year-old boy in a Penn State athletic facility, the report says. The boy’s mother reported the incident to a Penn State psychologist and to Penn State police, who informed a Penn State vice president, Gary Schultz. Confidential notes from Mr. Schultz indicate that he was aware of the gravity of the situation. “Behavior - at best inappropriate @ worst sexual improprieties,” one note says. Two days after the incident, additional notes from Mr. Schultz say that a second boy had told police a similar story: “Locker room. Wrestling. Kissed on head. Hugging from behind in shower.” The notes end with questions: “Is this the opening of pandora’s box? Other children?”

Police later determined that there was no criminal behavior established and that the matter was closed, the report says. On June 9, 1998, Mr. Schultz wrote in an email to Penn State’s athletic director that “I think the matter has been appropriately investigated and I hope it is now behind us.”

Page 57


View this page

If Not For 2nd Mile, Sandusky Could Have Been Head Coach, Paterno Apparently Wrote

Investigators discovered notes that “appear to be in Paterno’s handwriting” related to Jerry Sandusky’s retirement from Penn State in 1999. “We know this isn’t easy for you and it isn’t easy for us or Penn State,” the notes say. “If there were no 2nd Mile then I believe you belief [sic] that you probably could be the next Penn State FB Coach. But you wanted the best of two worlds and I probably should have sat down with you six or seven years ago and said look Jerry if you want to be the Head Coach at Penn State, give up your association with the 2nd Mile and concentrate on nothing but your family and Penn State.”

Page 65


View this page

Janitors Who Observed Assault in 2000 Feared Retaliation

In fall 2000, a Penn State janitor saw Jerry Sandusky performing oral sex on a young boy in the Assistant Coaches’ locker room, the report says. On the same night, another janitor saw Mr. Sandusky showering with a young boy. The two janitors reported the incident to a superior, the report says. But one of the janitors said they should keep quiet, or “they’ll get rid of all of us.” The other janitor told investigators that reporting the incident “would have been like going against the President of the United States in my eyes.” He added that “football runs this university.”

Page 75


View this page

Spanier: Limited Response to Reports of 2001 Incident Was ‘Humane Way to Proceed’

In February 2001, after speaking with Joe Paterno, Athletic Director Tim Curley proposed changing the administration’s response to the report Jerry Sandusky had abused a boy in a Penn State locker room. Instead of talking to 2nd Mile and the state Department of Welfare, Mr. Curley proposed meeting with Mr. Sandusky first. “I think I would be more comfortable meeting with the person and tell him about the information we received.” In an e-mail response, Penn State President Graham Spanier said the approach “is acceptable to me.” He said he admired Mr. Curley’s willingness to have a difficult conversation with Mr. Sandusky. “The only downside for us is if the message isn’t ‘heard’ and acted upon, and we then become vulnerable for not having reported it,” Mr. Spanier wrote. “But that can be assessed down the road. The approach you outline is humane and a reasonable way to proceed.”

Page 110


View this page

Penn State Officials Failed to Issue Clery Act Report

Joe Paterno, Tim Curley, and Mike McQueary “were obligated to report the 2001 Sandusky incident to the University Police Department for inclusion in Clery Act statistics and for determining whether a timely warning should be issued to the University community.” But no record exists of such a report, the investigation says. The officials “should have ensured that the University was compliant with the Clery Act with regard to this incident,” the investigation says.

Help annotate the Freeh Report: tell us which passages you think are important. Share your insights

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

July 12, 2012

A Guide to the Penn State Investigation

Help annotate the report
Tell us which passages you think are important.
Share your insights
Full document: Freeh Report on The Pennsylvania State University

The Freeh Report was released at 9 a.m. Thursday, July 12. Chronicle reporters annotated the report, providing insights on what the Freeh Group found, who it implicated, and what it means for the university. Complete coverage.

Page 15


View this page

Spanier and Board Failed in Their Duties, Report Says

The report is unwavering in its condemnation of the university’s two highest levels of leadership: the president and the Board of Trustees. “By not promptly and fully advising the Board of Trustees about the 1998 and 2001 child sexual abuse allegations against Sandusky and the subsequent Grand Jury investigation of him, Spanier failed in his duties as President,” the report says. “The Board also failed in its duties to oversee the President and senior University officials in 1998 and 2001 by not inquiring about important University matters and by not creating an environment where senior University officials felt accountable.”

The most powerful leaders in the university concealed facts and failed to protect children, primarily because they hoped to “avoid bad publicity,” the report finds. But other factors contributed as well, according to the committee. Specifically, the report blames “A culture of reverence for the football program that is ingrained at all levels of the campus community.”

Page 40


View this page

Coaches Saw Sandusky Shower With Boys Before 1998

Several Penn State staff members and football coaches regularly saw Sandusky showering with young boys in a Penn State locker building before May 1998, the report says. “None of the individuals interviewed notified their superiors of this behavior,” the report says. One former coach, Richard Anderson, told investigators he often saw Mr. Sandusky with children in the showers, but that he didn’t think the practice was improper.

Pages 47-50


View this page

In 1998, Vice President Schultz Feared ‘Pandora’s Box’

On May 3, 1998, Jerry Sandusky groped an 11-year-old boy in a Penn State athletic facility, the report says. The boy’s mother reported the incident to a Penn State psychologist and to Penn State police, who informed a Penn State vice president, Gary Schultz. Confidential notes from Mr. Schultz indicate that he was aware of the gravity of the situation. “Behavior - at best inappropriate @ worst sexual improprieties,” one note says. Two days after the incident, additional notes from Mr. Schultz say that a second boy had told police a similar story: “Locker room. Wrestling. Kissed on head. Hugging from behind in shower.” The notes end with questions: “Is this the opening of pandora’s box? Other children?”

Police later determined that there was no criminal behavior established and that the matter was closed, the report says. On June 9, 1998, Mr. Schultz wrote in an email to Penn State’s athletic director that “I think the matter has been appropriately investigated and I hope it is now behind us.”

Page 57


View this page

If Not For 2nd Mile, Sandusky Could Have Been Head Coach, Paterno Apparently Wrote

Investigators discovered notes that “appear to be in Paterno’s handwriting” related to Jerry Sandusky’s retirement from Penn State in 1999. “We know this isn’t easy for you and it isn’t easy for us or Penn State,” the notes say. “If there were no 2nd Mile then I believe you belief [sic] that you probably could be the next Penn State FB Coach. But you wanted the best of two worlds and I probably should have sat down with you six or seven years ago and said look Jerry if you want to be the Head Coach at Penn State, give up your association with the 2nd Mile and concentrate on nothing but your family and Penn State.”

Page 65


View this page

Janitors Who Observed Assault in 2000 Feared Retaliation

In fall 2000, a Penn State janitor saw Jerry Sandusky performing oral sex on a young boy in the Assistant Coaches’ locker room, the report says. On the same night, another janitor saw Mr. Sandusky showering with a young boy. The two janitors reported the incident to a superior, the report says. But one of the janitors said they should keep quiet, or “they’ll get rid of all of us.” The other janitor told investigators that reporting the incident “would have been like going against the President of the United States in my eyes.” He added that “football runs this university.”

Page 75


View this page

Spanier: Limited Response to Reports of 2001 Incident Was ‘Humane Way to Proceed’

In February 2001, after speaking with Joe Paterno, Athletic Director Tim Curley proposed changing the administration’s response to the report Jerry Sandusky had abused a boy in a Penn State locker room. Instead of talking to 2nd Mile and the state Department of Welfare, Mr. Curley proposed meeting with Mr. Sandusky first. “I think I would be more comfortable meeting with the person and tell him about the information we received.” In an e-mail response, Penn State President Graham Spanier said the approach “is acceptable to me.” He said he admired Mr. Curley’s willingness to have a difficult conversation with Mr. Sandusky. “The only downside for us is if the message isn’t ‘heard’ and acted upon, and we then become vulnerable for not having reported it,” Mr. Spanier wrote. “But that can be assessed down the road. The approach you outline is humane and a reasonable way to proceed.”

Page 110


View this page

Penn State Officials Failed to Issue Clery Act Report

Joe Paterno, Tim Curley, and Mike McQueary “were obligated to report the 2001 Sandusky incident to the University Police Department for inclusion in Clery Act statistics and for determining whether a timely warning should be issued to the University community.” But no record exists of such a report, the investigation says. The officials “should have ensured that the University was compliant with the Clery Act with regard to this incident,” the investigation says.

Help annotate the Freeh Report: tell us which passages you think are important. Share your insights
ADVERTISEMENT

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Athletics
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin