Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
News

A Jury Found Iowa State U. Partially Responsible for a Student’s Suicide. Here’s What That Could Mean for Other Colleges.

By Alexander C. Kafka September 4, 2019
Counseling centers at large universities should heed a recent decision about a student suicide at Iowa State U.
Counseling centers at large universities should heed a recent decision about a student suicide at Iowa State U. Alamy

A jury last month found Iowa State University partially responsible for the suicide in 2015 of Dane Schussler, a 21-year-old junior, and awarded his family $315,000.

Observers say the case raises questions about the extent of colleges’ responsibility for their students’ well-being, how much liability institutions might incur when their services are slashed, and whether certain common treatment practices should be rethought. What is certain is that the events surrounding Schussler’s treatment and death were complicated and, like every suicide, terribly sad. Schussler was said by friends and family to be a smart, funny young man with a bright future.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Counseling centers at large universities should heed a recent decision about a student suicide at Iowa State U.
Counseling centers at large universities should heed a recent decision about a student suicide at Iowa State U. Alamy

A jury last month found Iowa State University partially responsible for the suicide in 2015 of Dane Schussler, a 21-year-old junior, and awarded his family $315,000.

Observers say the case raises questions about the extent of colleges’ responsibility for their students’ well-being, how much liability institutions might incur when their services are slashed, and whether certain common treatment practices should be rethought. What is certain is that the events surrounding Schussler’s treatment and death were complicated and, like every suicide, terribly sad. Schussler was said by friends and family to be a smart, funny young man with a bright future.

Here are some facets of the case that legal and medical scholars say particularly caught their attention:

  • Schussler’s therapist was a graduate assistant with a master’s degree, not a licensed psychologist. She was overseen by an unlicensed supervisor. And the center’s licensed psychologist didn’t watch videotaped sessions with Schussler, treat him directly, or ask to speak to his parents. (The university argued that the therapist and her two supervisors were a properly credentialed team.)
  • A former director of the counseling center testified that budget reductions caused staffing shortages and warned in 2011 and 2012 about the consequent risks, including possible suicides.
  • Expert testimony suggested that despite Schussler’s discussion of suicide, the therapist misdiagnosed a major depressive disorder as a mild one.
  • In addition to giving him coping strategies and the number for a crisis hotline, Schussler’s therapist asked him to sign a “contract” stating that he wouldn’t harm himself. The contract, she said, satisfied her that he wouldn’t do injury to himself.

The university, which is considering whether to appeal, argues that the ruling is inconsistent with a previous state Supreme Court decision. In that case, the court “found that, unlike when a patient is hospitalized or is being treated in an institutional setting, a university student is not in the physical custody of the university. Accordingly, preventing the student’s suicide was beyond the university’s control.”

Universities have marketed the idea that they are ‘taking care of our children,’ but when something goes wrong, they are not responsible.

Daniel S. Medwed, a law professor at Northeastern University, said that, ideally, a counseling center will have a range of available treatments appropriate to undergraduates and graduate students with a wide spectrum of needs. Six sessions might be enough to treat some students’ problems. And if a center is known for overreacting, students might be reluctant to use its services. “Sometimes a student just needs a safe space to talk.”

Privacy laws, too, are a matter of balance, he said. If they are too strict, families might not be brought into treatment discussions when they should be. But if they are too loose, students could be afraid of bringing their problems to be discussed.

What’s clear, Medwed said, is that a bare-bones staff at the counseling center of a large public university is a health and legal liability. However, it is up to not only colleges but also state legislatures to consider their priorities, and both should be held accountable.

Victor Schwartz, a clinical associate professor of psychiatry at the New York University School of Medicine and chief medical officer of the Jed Foundation, a nonprofit that aims to prevent teen suicide, said that if colleges commit to treating clinical conditions, they must have the licensed, properly trained personnel to do that work. If a college doesn’t have the resources, it shouldn’t make the promises, he said.

Michael A. Olivas, a higher-education expert and law professor at the University of Houston, says a six-session plan in a case that sent up clear red flags is deeply problematic. The Jed Foundation’s Schwartz said session limits are common. The problem, he said, is deciding such a number at the beginning of a case and sticking to it even if evidence comes to light of more serious illness.

ADVERTISEMENT

Medwed and Olivas also find disturbing the “contract” the therapist had Schussler sign. They understand that it’s part of a therapeutic regimen, but, as Medwed puts it, it is essentially coerced — a “contract of adhesion” — in return for a service the student needs. Having such a contract, should a case go to court, might also raise in jurors’ minds what a counseling service promised, and didn’t necessarily deliver, in return.

It would be one thing if such contracts made medical sense even if they didn’t make legal sense. But, says Schwartz, “there is no evidence that they have any efficacy. In fact, there are suggestions that they may be counterproductive,” offering therapists a false sense of security. “To depend on them is not a well-founded approach.”

Peter F. Lake, who directs a higher-education law center at Stetson University, said that the Iowa State case, coupled with a 2018 Massachusetts verdict involving the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, suggests a new judicial mood toward suicides. For decades, Lake said, for better or worse, suicides were not considered an institutional responsibility except in rare instances, such as if they resulted from the abuse of a legal process or the misuse of a medication. The prevailing wisdom was that reasonable care will not prevent all suicides.

But that might be changing, Lake said. Juries seem particularly sensitive to cases in which services are inadequate or have been cut back. “This is a time when people need more services than ever,” Lake said. “If you’re retreating on service provision, you have to be really thoughtful about that.”

ADVERTISEMENT

As rich colleges provide more mental-health services and poorer ones can’t, mental health becomes one more arena of inequity, he said.

Regardless of how well-resourced they are, colleges can do more to educate students, said Kathryn Schussler, Dane Schussler’s mother. If they can require students to watch videos about the hazards of drinking and sexual assault, she said, they should also require them to watch videos about mental illness and warning signs for students and their classmates.

She also said that federal laws that prevent colleges from communicating students’ dire straits with parents, during crises and even after a suicide, urgently need reform. “It’s a failing system,” she said, because colleges can’t handle the problem of suicide by themselves. “I think they need to get the parents themselves involved.”

In her son’s case, she said, he probably should have gone on medical leave.

ADVERTISEMENT

Whatever the limits of a college’s services might be, they should be up front about them, she urges. If colleges can’t communicate with parents, if they can’t offer appropriately intensive intervention, warn students and their families about that, she said. “Make them aware of what they’re sending their children into. Be honest with families.”

She wrote in an op-ed: “It’s no wonder college suicide rates have soared. … The universities have marketed the idea that they are ‘taking care of our children,’ but when something goes wrong, they are not responsible because there is no ‘special relationship.’

“University policy is to not call the parents if a student expresses suicidal ideation. They still do not call the parents when a student unsuccessfully attempts suicide. They only call us to pick up the dead bodies of our dead children and then they cover up the details of their deaths.”

Alexander C. Kafka is a Chronicle senior editor. Follow him on Twitter @AlexanderKafka, or email him at alexander.kafka@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the September 20, 2019, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Kafka_Alexander_C.jpg
About the Author
Alexander C. Kafka
Alexander C. Kafka is a Chronicle senior editor. Email him at alexander.kafka@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

An Epidemic of Anguish

More News

Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through a flat black and white university building and a landscape bearing the image of a $100 bill.
Budget Troubles
‘Every Revenue Source Is at Risk’: Under Trump, Research Universities Are Cutting Back
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome topping a jar of money.
Budget Bill
Republicans’ Plan to Tax Higher Ed and Slash Funding Advances in Congress
Allison Pingree, a Cambridge, Mass. resident, joined hundreds at an April 12 rally urging Harvard to resist President Trump's influence on the institution.
International
Trump Administration Revokes Harvard’s Ability to Enroll International Students
Photo-based illustration of an open book with binary code instead of narrative paragraphs
Culture Shift
The Reading Struggle Meets AI

From The Review

Illustration of a Gold Seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
What Trump’s Accreditation Moves Get Right
By Samuel Negus
Illustration of a torn cold seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
The Weaponization of Accreditation
By Greg D. Pillar, Laurie Shanderson
Protestors gather outside the Pro-Palestinian encampment on the campus of UCLA in Los Angeles on Wednesday, May 1, 2024.
The Review | Conversation
Are Colleges Rife With Antisemitism? If So, What Should Be Done?
By Evan Goldstein, Len Gutkin

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin