Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
News

A Lesson From UC’s Split With Elsevier: Keep the Faculty in the Loop

By Lindsay Ellis March 1, 2019
Kevin L. Smith, dean of libraries at the U. of Kansas: “UC modeled a level of engagement with their faculty that is vitally important.”
Kevin L. Smith, dean of libraries at the U. of Kansas: “UC modeled a level of engagement with their faculty that is vitally important.”U. of Kansas

The University of California system’s announced break with the publishing giant Elsevier sent a clear message to research universities across the country: If your institution wants to follow suit, get ready to share a lot of information with your faculty.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Kevin L. Smith, dean of libraries at the U. of Kansas: “UC modeled a level of engagement with their faculty that is vitally important.”
Kevin L. Smith, dean of libraries at the U. of Kansas: “UC modeled a level of engagement with their faculty that is vitally important.”U. of Kansas

The University of California system’s announced break with the publishing giant Elsevier sent a clear message to research universities across the country: If your institution wants to follow suit, get ready to share a lot of information with your faculty.

During prolonged negotiations with Elsevier over a journal-subscription contract, UC held forums on its campuses and sent regular emails to its faculty members. The University of California at Los Angeles encouraged its professors to publish their work in non-Elsevier journals as the negotiations dragged on. And warning that access to Elsevier’s stable of some 2,500 journals may soon expire, UC listed possible ways scholars could read articles in those journals, including through interlibrary loans, in online repositories like PubMed, and by simply contacting the author and asking for a copy.

California’s 10-campus system is only the latest institution to walk away from a mass-subscription package with a major journal-publishing company. But because the deal’s players — UC and Elsevier — are research and publishing heavyweights, the negotiations were closely watched by advocates for open access and library deans who may soon be entering similar negotiations of their own.

Across the country, academic libraries’ tight budgets continue to clash with rising fees for bulk journal subscriptions, dubbed “big deals.” UC’s expiring contract with Elsevier cost about $50 million over five years. (Publishing companies say prices increase because journals publish more and more articles each year, creating more value.)

That financial concern is key. But so, too, are more idealistic questions about the merits of publishing in subscription-based journals. In announcing its decision to call off the contract talks, UC cited its support for open-access publishing, a model that would allow anyone to read research findings without having to pay an expensive subscription.

“Our members are having conversations with their senior administrators about these kinds of issues,” said Mary Lee Kennedy, executive director of the Association of Research Libraries. “I would not expect that this issue will go away.”

Lisa A. German, dean of libraries at the University of Houston, had followed UC’s negotiations closely. When she read UC’s announcement, she forwarded it to her university’s president and provost.

UC officials “spent quite a bit of time getting their ducks in a row, so to speak. This wasn’t a spur-of-the-moment thing,” she said, adding that UC’s communications throughout the Elsevier talks signaled support from both top administrators and the faculty. “They’ve created a blueprint for how to break a big deal in the right way,” she said.

‘A Wonderful Move’

On Friday, the day after UC made its announcement, Kevin L. Smith drafted an email to his colleagues as dean of the University of Kansas libraries. Kansas is negotiating its contract with Elsevier this year, and drawing on UC’s example, Smith is considering hosting forums and sending regular emails to professors, to update them on the status of the talks.

ADVERTISEMENT

“UC modeled a level of engagement with their faculty that is vitally important,” Smith said on Friday, adding, too, that he wants to include in conversations the interim provost and a library committee that is appointed by the University Senate. “I need to involve our faculty sooner and more deeply than I thought,” he said.

I need to involve our faculty sooner and more deeply than I thought.

Keeping faculty members in the loop is crucial because they depend on the work published in Elsevier’s journals to plan and conduct research. Without subscriptions, access is more challenging. These are “legitimate concerns,” Smith said.

“A central part of our job is to provide them with the resources to do their job,” he said. “If they panic — they have a right to — and we have an obligation to help them understand we will still be supporting their research … we need to engage them to allay that concern as much as we can.”

In a series of statements published on the University of California at Berkeley’s website, Jeffrey K. MacKie-Mason, who helped lead UC’s negotiation team, said that if Elsevier were to cut off UC from articles, that step would affect only those published since January 1. MacKie-Mason, university librarian at Berkeley, added that UC authors could still publish in Elsevier journals.

ADVERTISEMENT

Heather Joseph, executive director of the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition, acknowledged that not every professor would think that abandoning big-deal subscriptions was “a wonderful move.” But UC’s regular meetings with faculty members, she said, had made sure they didn’t feel left “out in the cold.”

Joseph’s coalition has been tracking big-deal negotiations, finding that six universities canceled bundles for 2018, with Springer Nature, Elsevier, and Wiley. But UC’s decision is distinct, she said, because of its scope and because the system garnered the political support it needed.

“The response we’ve seen so far, even informally, is, frankly, ‘Holy crap, this is really something,’” she said. “It’s big.”

Lindsay Ellis is a staff reporter. Follow her on Twitter @lindsayaellis, or email her at lindsay.ellis@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the March 15, 2019, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
International Finance & Operations Scholarship & Research Innovation & Transformation
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Ellis_Lindsay.jpg
About the Author
Lindsay Ellis
Lindsay Ellis, a reporter at The Wall Street Journal, previously covered research universities, workplace issues, and other topics for The Chronicle.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

U. of California System Cancels Elsevier Subscriptions, Calling Move a Win for Open Access
Open Access Is Going Mainstream. Here’s Why That Could Transform Academic Life.
In Talks With Elsevier, UCLA Reaches for a Novel Bargaining Chip: Its Faculty

More News

Brad Wolverton
Newsroom leadership
The Chronicle of Higher Education Names Brad Wolverton as Editor
Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
The Death of Shared Governance
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption

From The Review

Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell
John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin