Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
The Review

A Spectator Who Left Identity Behind

By Laura Mulvey December 13, 2015
Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall in To Have and Have Not. Laura Mulvey’s fundamental insight — that film cameras, characters, and spectators focus on women’s looks in a distorting way — speaks to many of us.
Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall in To Have and Have Not. Laura Mulvey’s fundamental insight — that film cameras, characters, and spectators focus on women’s looks in a distorting way — speaks to many of us. Warner Brothers, Photofest

I read these four essays with great interest, very much enjoying their perspectives and, as so often, looking for clues to the secret of the strange longevity of “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” What these essays share is a welcome understanding that, whether or not “Visual Pleasure” still has value, it has to be located in its historical context: It could not have been written either much earlier or much later. It should be read as a document of its time, not for abiding theoretical value.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

I read these four essays with great interest, very much enjoying their perspectives and, as so often, looking for clues to the secret of the strange longevity of “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” What these essays share is a welcome understanding that, whether or not “Visual Pleasure” still has value, it has to be located in its historical context: It could not have been written either much earlier or much later. It should be read as a document of its time, not for abiding theoretical value.

The Male Gaze in Retrospect

6216-gaze-sidebar

In 1975, Laura Mulvey brought a new perspective to cinema studies. Susan Bordo, Jack Halberstam, Toby Miller, Sharon Marcus, and Mulvey herself consider its impact. Read their essays.

As I wondered about the question of longevity, all the essays seemed to suggest that “Visual Pleasure” was particularly useful as a provocation; it raises questions that still have resonance even as the assumptions behind them are refuted. At some point in the 1980s, I realized that my essay had found its way onto university reading lists, and I remember that I fantasized about a ban that would stop anyone under a certain age from reading it. As it happens, these four responses all bear witness to the continuing life of “Visual Pleasure” in undergraduate cinema studies and also to its continuing ability, at the advanced age of 40, to annoy and confuse. It has preserved some of its capacity to provoke, and that must be valuable.

The four responses illustrate one particularly wide gap between the essay’s argument and the way it is understood today. In 1975, I had in mind a spectator who left identity behind as he or she entered the darkened theater, so that the experience of a Hollywood film (this is of the high-studio-system period) was specifically unlike real life. The opposition of “voyeurism” and “exhibitionism” was, to my mind, infinitely more schematic on the screen than it ever was in Freud and, equally, infinitely less complex than in life. And the use of the pronoun “he” for all spectators was intended to draw attention to a homogenizing, universalizing mode of address: As actual social identities and cultures were, for complex social and political reasons, by and large repressed by Hollywood, there was little point in lamenting their absence. For instance, to address the question of race and its repression in this nearly apartheid cinema would have demanded a different polemic, a different polemicist, and a much more historical, and thus a more serious, argument.

This was a cinema I could write about with confidence precisely because I knew it well and, indeed, loved it.

Toward the beginning of “Visual Pleasure,” I said that I was leaving aside Hollywood’s irony and self-consciousness, indicating that this was a cinema I could write about with confidence precisely because I knew it well and, indeed, loved it. Although I always argue that the essay spoke for and through its time, retrospectively I see that it was also rooted in my personal relationship to Hollywood. As I suggested, perhaps implicitly, in “Afterthoughts on Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema” (1981), I enjoyed the “transvestite clothes” that Hollywood offered the female spectator, and I enjoyed the visual pleasure involved in the extraordinary ways in which the female star as spectacle fused with cinema as spectacle. But feminism detached me from that particular screen, and, whether I liked it or not, I became a thoughtful rather than an absorbed spectator.

Recently digital technology transformed my mode of spectatorship once again. I found myself going back to the Hollywood movies of “Visual Pleasure” and their contemporaries. With the ability to still the moving image and to repeat sequences (the “delayed cinema” in my book Death 24x a Second: Stillness in the Moving Image), I watched fascinated as I, rather than the male star, controlled the action, as I undermined the linearity of the narrative. I could, indeed, hold him in the stilled image for voyeuristic contemplation, just as the female star had so often been displayed as spectacle. From this kind of spectatorship, anyone can enjoy the erotics of the cinematic “gaze,” regardless of gender or even individual sexual proclivity. Of course, this kind of spectatorship leads to other, more abstract, ideas; but Hollywood cinema can now be materialized on the screen with more-nuanced images of gender and more-complex concepts of narrative than I had visualized in 1975.

Laura Mulvey is a filmmaker and professor in the department of film, media, and cultural studies at Birkbeck College, University of London.

A version of this article appeared in the December 18, 2015, issue.
Read other items in The Male Gaze in Retrospect.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
The Death of Shared Governance
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell
John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin