Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
News

A Tax on Endowments Became Law. But Congressmen and Colleges Are Still Fighting It.

By Adam Harris March 8, 2018

Less than three months after an overhaul of the nation’s tax code was signed into law, a pair of federal lawmakers has introduced bipartisan legislation to repeal a provision that was roundly opposed by higher education.

The Don’t Tax Higher Education Act, introduced on Thursday, is sponsored by Rep. John Delaney, Democrat of Maryland, and Rep. Bradley Byrne, Republican of Alabama, and would repeal the levy on university endowments in the new tax law.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Less than three months after an overhaul of the nation’s tax code was signed into law, a pair of federal lawmakers has introduced bipartisan legislation to repeal a provision that was roundly opposed by higher education.

The Don’t Tax Higher Education Act, introduced on Thursday, is sponsored by Rep. John Delaney, Democrat of Maryland, and Rep. Bradley Byrne, Republican of Alabama, and would repeal the levy on university endowments in the new tax law.

“America’s colleges and universities are one of our singular assets as a country. We lead the world in higher education, and it gives us an incredible advantage in today’s high-tech, high-skill global economy,” said Delaney in a written statement. “Colleges and universities rely on their endowments to provide essential funding for financial aid, support difference-making research and teaching, and effectively manage complex long- and short-term costs.”

The provision on university endowments was one of many that drew the ire of higher education in the recent discussion to revamp the tax code. Like other provisions under consideration, including a tax on tuition waivers that was ultimately stricken from the final bill, it has roots in the tax-reform package proposed by Rep. Dave Camp, Republican of Michigan, in 2014.

The Tax Reform Act of 2014, as it was called, worried higher-education advocates for some of the steep cuts it proposed in student and family benefits, as well as some more-direct hits to university funds. Camp, who has since left Congress, called for a 1-percent tax on the investment income of endowments at private colleges with at least $100,000 in assets per full-time student.

In the original version of the new tax law, proposed last fall by Republicans in the House of Representatives, the plan to tax endowment earnings nearly mirrored that language — at least $100,000 per student — but raised the tax to 1.4 percent and set a minimum threshold for students enrolled. A Chronicle analysis at the time found that the proposal, as written, would have applied to fewer than 150 colleges and would have generated an estimated $3 billion over 10 years.

The proposal seemed to many higher-education leaders to be a gateway for future taxes on university funds. Sure, the tax applied only to private colleges with large endowments now, but what would happen when Congress was again trying to find revenue in some future tax reform?

“The damage caused by those changes would be exacerbated by the proposed endowment tax, which would siphon millions in donated funds away from crucial priorities and would set a dangerous precedent of taxing nonprofit institutions — a practice that is likely to only escalate in scope and scale as lawmakers seek offsets for other cuts in the future,” wrote Margaret Spellings, president of the University of North Carolina system and an education secretary under President George W. Bush, in an opinion essay.

‘Deep Objections’

Similar statements dotted the higher-education landscape. House Republicans ultimately raised the threshold to $250,000 per full-time student, and the Senate set the number at at least $500,000, which is how it appears in the final bill.

Still, the tax — and attempts to shield some colleges from it — became one of the most hotly debated parts of the discussion to overhaul the tax code. Some lawmakers argued that a proposal to exempt colleges that do not receive federal funds was simply a carve-out to benefit a conservative darling. Meanwhile, a last-minute change that would have exempted colleges that did not charge tuition was eliminated on the grounds that it violated a key Senate rule.

ADVERTISEMENT

One institution has been able to find its way out of the levy since the new code was enacted. Berea College, a small college in Kentucky that charges no tuition, was exempted after a provision in a recent budget deal shielded it from the tax. Other institutions were not so lucky, and on Wednesday leaders of those colleges sent a letter to House and Senate leaders to express their “deep objections.”

“The new tax establishes a precedent that threatens all charities,” they wrote. “We urge you to revisit this misguided policy in the near term and look forward to working with you to advance the goals of access, affordability, and success for students across the country.”

That concern was shared by Byrne, who has been working with Delaney for the last several weeks to build support for the new legislation, which was unrelated to the Wednesday letter.

“While the impact of the excise tax on college endowments may be small today, I worry about future growth and expansion of this misguided tax on higher education,” said Byrne, a former chancellor of a community-college system, in a written statement. “We should all be looking for ways to increase access to higher education, and endowments play a very important role in funding scholarships, student aid, and important research initiatives.”

Adam Harris is a breaking-news reporter. Follow him on Twitter @AdamHSays or email him at adam.harris@chronicle.com.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Finance & Operations Law & Policy Political Influence & Activism
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Adam Harris - Profile Pic
About the Author
Adam Harris
Adam Harris, a staff writer at The Atlantic, was previously a reporter at The Chronicle of Higher Education and covered federal education policy and historically Black colleges and universities. He also worked at ProPublica.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Final Tax Bill Would Spare Some Higher-Ed Worries, but Could Lead to State Budget Cuts
If Republicans Get Their Way, These Colleges Would See Their Endowments Taxed
A Small College With a Big Endowment Gets Snared in Tax Bill

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin