Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    A Culture of Cybersecurity
    Opportunities in the Hard Sciences
    Career Preparation
Sign In
The Review

Academic Freedom Is Not a Divine Right

By Stanley Fish September 5, 2008

Is academic freedom a philosophical concept tied to larger concepts of individual dignity and autonomy, or is it a guild concept developed in an effort to insulate the enterprise from the threat of a hostile takeover? I come down on the side of guild concept. Academic freedom is not a subset of freedom in general, and one cannot reason from a theoretical account of freedom to what one is free to do in a university setting. Academic freedom, to put it simply and starkly, is freedom for academics — that is, for those engaged in a certain task.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Is academic freedom a philosophical concept tied to larger concepts of individual dignity and autonomy, or is it a guild concept developed in an effort to insulate the enterprise from the threat of a hostile takeover? I come down on the side of guild concept. Academic freedom is not a subset of freedom in general, and one cannot reason from a theoretical account of freedom to what one is free to do in a university setting. Academic freedom, to put it simply and starkly, is freedom for academics — that is, for those engaged in a certain task.

It is the nature of that task and not any large abstraction like freedom or freedom of speech that determines the range of permissible and prescribed behavior. You start with the idea of pursuing a line of inquiry to whatever conclusion it brings you, and then you ask for the freedom to engage in that pursuit without interference from external forces that would tie you to the agendas of another enterprise. The freedom you ask for is not added on to the project; it is constitutive of it, for you can’t follow where an inquiry takes you if obstacles are constantly put in your way. When all is said and done, academic freedom is just a fancy name for being allowed to do your job, and it is only because that job has the peculiar feature of not having a pre-stipulated goal that those who do it must be granted a degree of latitude and flexibility not granted to the practitioners of other professions, who must be responsive to the customer or to the bottom line or to the electorate or to the global economy. (That’s why there’s no such thing as “corporate-manager freedom” or “shoe-salesman freedom” or “dermatologist freedom.”)

If you think of academic freedom in this way — as a logical extension of a particular task and not as a free-standing value — you will be able to defend it both from those who see it as an unwarranted indulgence of pampered professors and from those pampered professors who would extend it into a general principle that allows them to say and do, or not do, whatever they like. To those who regard academic freedom as an unwarranted indulgence you can say, No, it’s not an indulgence, it’s a necessary condition for engaging in this enterprise, and if you want this enterprise to flourish, you must grant it. To those professors who turn freedom into license by using the classroom as a partisan pulpit, or by teaching materials unrelated to the course description, or by coming to class unprepared or not at all, you can say, Look, it’s freedom to do the job, not freedom to change it or shirk it.

This is what it means to say that academic freedom is not a general freedom like the freedoms guaranteed you by the Constitution and the First Amendment; it is task-specific and task-limited. You might have the general freedom as a teacher at a public institution not to be dismissed because of your religious views, but you could be denied promotion because your department decided that an interest in theology — a perfectly respectable academic topic — did not fit in with its long-range plans. And while your department might be free to make that decision, the dean is also free to decide that a department that so decides is not one she wants to encourage; she might deny it faculty lines or move to take away its graduate program. Of course a dean who does that risks incurring the displeasure of a provost or a president who is free to replace her on the spot. Administrators have no academic freedom; they serve at will. And while faculty members do not serve at will — as long as they have tenure, that is — the limited freedom they enjoy in the classroom and in research does not protect them from being disciplined or even fired if they fail to carry out the ordinary duties of their positions.

In short, both the nature and quantity of your freedom vary with the professional context in which you might seek to exercise it. What then is left of academic freedom as a rallying cry? Not much.

It’s not a grand philosophical concept; it’s not even a legal concept apart from the contract you enter into when you accept employment. If that contract lists areas in which you are free to make responsible academic choices concerning the subject matter and organization of a course, you might be able to sue for breach of contract if the administration steps in and tells you that this is the textbook you must use. But if the course were a large multisectioned course with a prescribed syllabus and required texts, you’d probably lose, and even if you won, what would be affirmed is not your freedom, but your rights under contract.

In the end, I’m not sure that there’s much use to the term “academic freedom,” and too often I have seen it used or invoked as an excuse for irresponsibility. One could reply that academic freedom has a rhetorical use; it’s a flag that we can wave around in the hope that it will stop some hostile adversary force — a legislature, a board of trustees, a moral majority — in its tracks. I guess that’s OK so long as we don’t take the huffing and puffing too seriously and begin to believe that it is academic freedom — rather than professional independence or better working conditions — that we are defending. In saying that, I don’t mean to deny that politics threatens academic freedom both from the outside and the inside: from the outside when the academic enterprise is in danger of being hijacked, and from the inside when the academic enterprise is in danger of being hijacked. But of course what is being threatened from either direction is not freedom per se or even freedom of thought; what is being threatened is the enterprise itself, which cannot be identified with freedom, but which needs freedom of a certain kind — freedom from external impositions — as a condition of its exercise.

The trouble with the term “academic freedom” is that the emphasis almost always falls on the “freedom” part rather than the “academic” part, with the result that the concept is made to seem much grander than it is. The word “freedom” is just too big — it conjures up images of the last scene in a bad Mel Gibson movie. Invoking academic freedom carries with it the danger of thinking that we are doing something noble and even vaguely religious, when in fact what we are doing, or should be interested in doing, is no more — or less — than our academic jobs.

Stanley Fish is a university professor and professor of law at Florida International University, and dean emeritus of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at the University of Illinois at Chicago. His book Save the World on Your Own Time has just been published by Oxford University Press.


http://chronicle.com Section: The Chronicle Review Volume 55, Issue 2, Page B10

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion Academic Freedom
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Stanley Fish- Len
About the Author
Stanley Fish
Stanley Fish is a professor in residence at the New College of Florida. He is the author of many books, including Law at the Movies, forthcoming from Oxford in 2024.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Illustration showing details of a U.S. EEOC letter to Harvard U.
Bias Allegations
Faculty Hiring Is Under Federal Scrutiny at Harvard
Illustration showing nontraditional students: a pregnant worman, a soldier; a working professional; an elderly man; and a woman with an artificial leg
'Unique Needs'
Common App Takes an In-Depth Look at Independent Students
Photo-based illustration of a Sonoma State University clock structure that's fallen into a hole in a $100 bill.
Campus Crossroads
Sonoma State U. Is Making Big Cuts to Close a Budget Hole. What Will Be Left?
Illustration showing three classical columns on stacks of coins, at different heights due to the amount of coins stacked underneath
Data
These 32 Colleges Could Take a Financial Hit Under Republicans’ Expanded Endowment Tax

From The Review

Illustration depicting a pendulum with a red ball featuring a portion of President Trump's face to the left about to strike balls showing a group of protesters.
The Review | Opinion
Trump Is Destroying DEI With the Same Tools That Built It
By Noliwe M. Rooks
Illustration showing two men and giant books, split into two sides—one blue and one red. The two men are reaching across the center color devide to shake hands.
The Review | Opinion
Left and Right Agree: Higher Ed Needs to Change
By Michael W. Clune
University of British Columbia president and vice-chancellor Santa Ono pauses while speaking during a memorandum of understanding  signing ceremony between the Tsilhqot'in National Government and UBC, in Vancouver, British Columbia, on Dec. 8, 2021.
The Review | Opinion
Santa Ono Flees for Florida
By Silke-Maria Weineck

Upcoming Events

Plain_USF_AIWorkForce_VF.png
New Academic Programs for an AI-Driven Work Force
Cincy_Plain.png
Hands-On Career Preparation
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin