> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • Student-Success Resource Center
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Faculty
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Accreditation Standards Should Include Treatment of Adjuncts, Report Says

By  Eric Kelderman
January 29, 2014
Washington

The growing number of part-time faculty members is lowering the quality of education at many colleges and needs to be addressed by accreditors, says a new report from the Council for Higher Education Accreditation, which is holding its annual meeting here this week.

The group represents 3,000 accredited institutions, recognizes some 60 accrediting organizations, and advocates for “self-regulation of academic quality through accreditation.”

The council’s report says the evidence “affirms that there is a lack of institutional support for non-tenure-track faculty” that is “compromising the quality of teaching and learning.”

We're sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network.

Please allow access to our site, and then refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, please contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

The growing number of part-time faculty members is lowering the quality of education at many colleges and needs to be addressed by accreditors, says a new report from the Council for Higher Education Accreditation, which is holding its annual meeting here this week.

The group represents 3,000 accredited institutions, recognizes some 60 accrediting organizations, and advocates for “self-regulation of academic quality through accreditation.”

The council’s report says the evidence “affirms that there is a lack of institutional support for non-tenure-track faculty” that is “compromising the quality of teaching and learning.”

That non-tenure-track faculty members are a majority at institutions in all sectors of higher education is well established, the report says. In 1969 nearly 80 percent of faculty members were in full-time, tenure-track positions. But by 2009 that proportion had fallen to less than 34 percent, it says, citing figures from the National Center for Education Statistics and the American Federation of Teachers.

The problem is not just the growing number of part-time, adjunct faculty members but the poor working conditions many of them experience, which can have a negative effect on instruction and learning, says the report.

ADVERTISEMENT

Those conditions include last-minute hiring decisions that leave part-time faculty members with a lack of time to prepare for their courses. Non-tenure-track faculty members also face a lack of professional development, exclusion from curriculum design, and little access to office space and staff support, the report says.

“These conditions are problematic, but so are inequitable compensation, job insecurity, the denial of health-care benefits and retirement plans … and a lack of respect for non-tenure-track faculty from tenured faculty and administrators on many campuses,” it adds.

In order to improve students’ learning, accreditors need to consider the amount of support that institutions provide for their adjunct faculty members, and perhaps create new standards for their working conditions, including guidelines for professional development and mentoring and requirements for institutions to develop policies for their compensation, evaluation, and retention, the report says.

The paper is a result of a July meeting held by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation in partnership with the Delphi Project for Changing Faculty on Student Success.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Eric Kelderman
Eric Kelderman covers issues of power, politics, and purse strings in higher education. You can email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com, or find him on Twitter @etkeld.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Accessibility Statement
    Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin