> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • Public Perception of College
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Technology
    • The Workplace
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Technology
    • The Workplace
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Technology
    • The Workplace
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Technology
    • The Workplace
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Technology
    • The Workplace
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Technology
    • The Workplace
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Accreditors Rarely Lose Lawsuits, but They Keep Getting Sued. Here’s Why.

By  Eric Kelderman
September 30, 2016

In June, after several years of sanctions over its financial troubles, Paine College lost its accreditation.

Not long after that, officials at Paine did what most colleges do in that situation: They filed a federal lawsuit against their accreditor, in this case the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools’ Commission on Colleges.

It’s standard practice for colleges to file suit when they are faced with the possibility of losing accreditation because the stakes are so high. Without accreditation, colleges are not eligible for federal student aid, and they are much more likely to have to close their doors.

We're sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network.

Please allow access to our site, and then refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, please contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

In June, after several years of sanctions over its financial troubles, Paine College lost its accreditation.

Not long after that, officials at Paine did what most colleges do in that situation: They filed a federal lawsuit against their accreditor, in this case the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools’ Commission on Colleges.

It’s standard practice for colleges to file suit when they are faced with the possibility of losing accreditation because the stakes are so high. Without accreditation, colleges are not eligible for federal student aid, and they are much more likely to have to close their doors.

Without accreditation, colleges are not eligible for federal student aid, and they are much more likely to have to close their doors.

Brent W. Herrin, a lawyer in Atlanta representing the college, said the Southern Association had failed to follow its own procedures and had not considered all the relevant financial information about Paine.

Complaints like those are common in suits against accreditors — largely because they are the only ones that are likely to persuade a judge to delay or overturn a negative action by an accrediting body.

ADVERTISEMENT

But the college’s chances of succeeding are poor. Patrick W. McKee, a lawyer for the Southern Association, has represented the accreditor in more than two dozen suits over a quarter-century. A college has never won one of those cases based on the merits, he said, though in some cases the parties have settled.

Still, just because accreditors don’t lose doesn’t mean they’re not affected, he said. The suits are costly and time-consuming, especially for the volunteer reviewers who may be deposed or called into court to testify.

The lawsuits also represent a dilemma for accreditors. The agencies are under increasing pressure to be tough on underperforming colleges, said Robert M. Shireman, a senior fellow at the Century Foundation and a former deputy under secretary at the U.S. Department of Education. Yet when accreditors do take action, Mr. Shireman noted, they encounter not only lawsuits, but a political and public backlash.

Limited Legal Authority

The dilemma is due in part to the peculiar structure of accreditation in the United States.

Accrediting organizations act as gatekeepers for federal dollars, but they are not government agencies that have to make most of their decisions in public.

ADVERTISEMENT

So colleges can use the courts to help ensure that accreditors are not making unfair or arbitrary decisions against the institutions they oversee, said Ben Miller, who has written about accreditation as a scholar with the Center for American Progress.

But because accreditors are private, nonprofit organizations — essentially, associations of member colleges — they don’t have nearly the same level of legal authority and protections as the Education Department.

Colleges don’t file lawsuits against the Education Department nearly as often as they do against accreditors, said John R. Przypyszny, a lawyer who has represented several accreditors for the firm Drinker Biddle. And when the department gets sued, it has unlimited resources, and lawyers from the Justice Department, to support its defense.

Accreditors, however, do have some advantages over colleges in the courtroom, Mr. Przypyszny said. Judges almost always defer to the organizations on whether a college is meeting their standards. That is similar to the way judges defer to federal agencies in the application of their rules and regulations, he said.

When colleges have successfully sued accreditors, it’s often because the accreditor has strayed from its own policies and procedures, said David A. Bergeron, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress and a former acting assistant secretary for postsecondary education.

ADVERTISEMENT

How many opportunities should a college get to plead its case? ‘How much due process is enough?’

Congress and the Education Department tried in the most recent renewal of the Higher Education Act to reduce the likelihood of lawsuits against accreditors, Mr. Bergeron said. For example, they allowed institutions to update the accreditor on any last-minute improvements in finances. A majority of negative accreditation decisions are based on a college’s flagging financial condition and the accreditor’s judgment that it can no longer support its programs.

But the question remains of how many opportunities a college should get to plead its case, he said: “How much due process is enough?”

The other problem, Mr. Bergeron said, is that lawsuits can get ugly. “So often these actions lead to the loss of normal sanity and reason,” he said. “They become pissing contests that don’t serve anyone well.”

Searching for Solutions

In many cases, however, the lawsuits serve simply as a way to delay an institution’s inevitable loss of accreditation. Sometimes, the delay itself is helpful, said Mr. McKee, the lawyer representing the Southern Association. The association now automatically agrees to a preliminary injunction, stalling the removal of accreditation until a case is settled between the parties or decided in court.

The association has also agreed to delay legal actions so colleges can try to find a buyer or another college with which to merge, he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Policy makers face the question of whether there is more that accreditors and the Education Department can do to prevent lawsuits in the first place.

Mr. Miller, from the Center for American Progress, said it might help to give accreditors the ability to impose more-serious intermediate sanctions against struggling institutions.

While accreditors can issue warnings or put a college on probation, those actions only require a college to report on how it intends to remedy any problems.

Mr. Shireman said the accreditors now have the flexibility to limit enrollment to prevent a college from growing beyond its means. “They just don’t do it, but I think they could,” he said.

Mr. Przypyszny, the lawyer from Drinker Biddle, said accreditors could limit the size of a particular program. But stopping enrollment could put an accreditor in danger of violating antitrust laws, he said, because such an action would give an advantage to an institution’s competitors.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. Shireman said the Education Department, too, could take a stronger role in sanctioning struggling institutions based on the actions of accreditors. “Let’s pay attention to what accreditors are finding and take some action,” he said.

Mr. Bergeron and Mr. Miller, however, think the only way to protect accreditors from legal action is to remove their authority as gatekeepers of federal financial aid.

“It’s fair to say they shouldn’t make the final call” on removing accreditation, Mr. Miller said. “But then they can’t be the ones to grant access, either.”

Eric Kelderman writes about money and accountability in higher education, including such areas as state policy, accreditation, and legal affairs. You can find him on Twitter @etkeld, or email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the October 14, 2016, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Eric Kelderman
Eric Kelderman covers issues of power, politics, and purse strings in higher education. You can email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com, or find him on Twitter @etkeld.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

  • In San Francisco, the Fates of a College and Its Accreditor Are on the Line
  • Accreditors Feel the Heat, but Are Torn Over Calls for Change
  • Senators Say Accreditors Are Ineffective and Beset by Conflicts of Interest
  • Settlement of College’s Accreditation Lawsuit Could Spur Changes in the Process
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Accessibility Statement
    Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin