Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Institutional Integrity

Adams State’s President Says Her University Is Accreditor’s ‘Whipping Boy’

By Eric Kelderman March 9, 2016
Beverlee J. McClure is president of Adams State U., in Colorado. In a strongly worded letter this week, she suggests that the Higher Learning Commission’s decision to place Adams State on probation, after investigating problems revealed in a Chronicle report, was meant “to make some sort of political statement.”
Beverlee J. McClure is president of Adams State U., in Colorado. In a strongly worded letter this week, she suggests that the Higher Learning Commission’s decision to place Adams State on probation, after investigating problems revealed in a Chronicle report, was meant “to make some sort of political statement.”

The president of Adams State University lashed out this week at the institution’s accrediting agency after the agency’s recent decision to put the university on probation.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Beverlee J. McClure is president of Adams State U., in Colorado. In a strongly worded letter this week, she suggests that the Higher Learning Commission’s decision to place Adams State on probation, after investigating problems revealed in a Chronicle report, was meant “to make some sort of political statement.”
Beverlee J. McClure is president of Adams State U., in Colorado. In a strongly worded letter this week, she suggests that the Higher Learning Commission’s decision to place Adams State on probation, after investigating problems revealed in a Chronicle report, was meant “to make some sort of political statement.”

The president of Adams State University lashed out this week at the institution’s accrediting agency after the agency’s recent decision to put the university on probation.

The president, Beverlee J. McClure, said in an open letter to the Higher Learning Commission that the Colorado institution was “left feeling like HLC’s whipping boy, with none of the benefits of HLC membership.”

Adams State came under the accreditor’s scrutiny after a 2014 article in The Chronicle raised questions about whether some of the university’s distance-education courses were not rigorous enough and were being used by athletes at other institutions to raise their grade-point averages.

The accreditor’s board decided last month that the university had not met the accrediting standard for institutional integrity and might be violating Education Department rules for correspondence courses and distance education.

But Ms. McClure, who began her tenure as president in July, said in her letter that the accreditor’s decision “seems like a calculated move to undermine the university.”

“We have obviously been chosen by the HLC to make some sort of political statement,” Ms. McClure wrote.

In an interview with The Chronicle, Ms. McClure said the accreditor seemed to be taking a hard line on Adams State to make itself look good for the Education Department. Instead, she said, accreditation should be a “two-way street,” with the accreditor serving not just as a regulatory agency but also an advocate for its member institutions, helping them to meet the standards.

Troubled History

This isn’t the first time the university has gotten attention from its accreditor over online courses. The commission previously inquired about the programs after The Chronicle reported in 2012 about compressed courses offered by Adams State; Cloud County Community College, in Kansas; and Western Oklahoma State College.

At the time, the accreditor took no action against Adams State or Cloud, but it placed Western Oklahoma on probation, in April 2013. That sanction was lifted in June 2015, according to information from the commission’s website.

The accreditor raised concerns about online courses that might not meet the Education Department’s requirement for ‘regular and substantive interaction between the student and the instructor.’

After The Chronicle’s 2014 article was published, Adams State responded by freezing enrollment in its correspondence courses. The accreditor then decided early last year that a team of reviewers should visit the college in September.

ADVERTISEMENT

While much of the visiting team’s report notes progress and actions taken to deal with the threat to academic integrity, the reviewers also found significant problems.

In particular, the site review raised concerns that some of the university’s online courses might not meet the Education Department’s requirement for “regular and substantive interaction between the student and the instructor.”

Looking at more than 60 online courses, the reviewers found that several required only one discussion post from the student, and some had no requirement for posting in an online discussion.

In addition, the reviewers found that many of the online courses were treated by instructors as self-paced, “with no set due dates for assignments.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Several individual sections of online courses enrolled 450 to 600 students each, the reviewers found. “This heavy student-to-faculty loading calls into question the academic integrity of the courses and quality of instruction,” the commission wrote.

A January letter from the accreditor after the visit made clear that the university was at risk for some sanction. “Because the team found that one or more core components are not met, the board will consider imposing the sanction of probation,” the commission wrote.

Plea for a Meeting

Despite that letter, and the extensive findings by the reviewers, Ms. McClure said she was surprised by the accreditor’s decision to put the university on probation, since just a small portion of the institution’s courses were in question.

In her letter this week, she went on to list several other reasons she felt the sanction was unfair.

ADVERTISEMENT

Before the accreditor’s reviewers visited the campus, the Colorado Department of Higher Education reviewed the university’s practices, as did the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, she noted.

Neither group found any major problems, though neither was charged with ensuring compliance with federal regulations or accreditation standards.

The accreditor also identified problems outside the concerns raised by The Chronicle’s articles, Ms. McClure said.

The commission, however, made clear in its earlier messages that the on-site review would encompass “all commission criteria for accreditation, assumed practices, and requirements for federal compliance,” according to a letter from the commission to the university last June.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ms. McClure also said much of the accreditor’s concerns could have been answered if she had just had an opportunity to discuss the issues with the commission’s board or president before the board voted.

Ms. McClure said she had been told she could address the board members for five minutes during their deliberations, then was told she could not meet with them.

John Hausaman, a spokesman for the commission, said in an email that its rules would not have allowed Ms. McClure to “interact or engage in discussion on institutional matters” with board members, as such rules are meant to preserve the autonomy of the decision-making process. The commission’s board meetings allow for public comment only “on matters of policy, procedure, and other potential action items,” he wrote.

Finally, Ms. McClure noted in her letter that she had not been at Adams State when the problems were revealed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Adams State is committed to fixing the problems, she wrote, but the probation “unfairly punishes the new leadership team for findings that occurred prior to their arrival.”

The accreditor should review all of the documents that the university has prepared and allow her to talk to the board, Ms. McClure wrote.

“I believe this will lead to a reversal of this onerous decision,” she said, “to impact an entire university for concerns that have been corrected for a small percentage of online courses.”

Eric Kelderman writes about money and accountability in higher education, including such areas as state policy, accreditation, and legal affairs. You can find him on Twitter @etkeld, or email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the March 18, 2016, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Eric Kelderman
About the Author
Eric Kelderman
Eric Kelderman covers issues of power, politics, and purse strings in higher education. You can email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com, or find him on Twitter @etkeld.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Confessions of a Fixer
Cheating Goes High-Tech

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
The Death of Shared Governance
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell
John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin