Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Career Confidential

Administration 101: Working With Executive Search Firms

Like it or not, consultants are part of the process, so set aside your antipathy and learn from them.

By David D. Perlmutter March 5, 2017
Careers-Career-Confidential
Kevin Van Aelst for The Chronicle

Thanks to my research on academic careers and to my involvement (as committee chair or candidate) in more than a dozen hiring committees for senior administrators, I’ve spent a lot of time talking with search consultants. Usually they have proved to be knowledgeable, straightforward, and pleasant. Yet across academe, the mere mention of “the outside search firm” often draws eye-rolls or cynical snorts from professors — and not a few administrators, too.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Thanks to my research on academic careers and to my involvement (as committee chair or candidate) in more than a dozen hiring committees for senior administrators, I’ve spent a lot of time talking with search consultants. Usually they have proved to be knowledgeable, straightforward, and pleasant. Yet across academe, the mere mention of “the outside search firm” often draws eye-rolls or cynical snorts from professors — and not a few administrators, too.

Why the negativity?

In part, academic search firms are victims of their own success and prominence. If you want to become a dean, provost, or president in higher education, you can bet a search firm will be intimately involved in your quest.

Because they are often not academics themselves, consultants can be seen as outsiders interfering in a faculty matter. They are regularly held liable for the mercenary (in both senses of the word) nature of many modern academic careers, with leaders who serve two to three years in one place only to head off to the next job. When searches run into trouble, consultants are easily blamed, and even when they are not culpable, many consider it part of their job to take the fall. And, yes, search firms are paid very well.

Careers-Career-Confidential
Admin 101
In this series, David D. Perlmutter writes about pursuing a career in academic administration and about surviving and thriving as a leader.
  • Admin 101: How to Fix Our Cold, Inefficient Hiring
  • Admin 101: How to Explain the Complicated to the Brilliant
  • Admin 101: How Good Leaders Say No
  • Admin 101: How to Make the ‘Big Ask’ on Campus
  • Admin 101: What to Know About Alumni Relations
  • Admin 101: Why It’s Hard to Operate ‘Outside the Box’ in Academe

In this series on becoming and thriving as an academic administrator (from chair to dean to provost and beyond) we have covered the initial decision to join the game and the ways to prepare for the job hunt. Now we turn to the part of the process that entails working with search consultants who can make or break your ambitions.

Get on their radar. The search firm’s first priority is to provide a strong, diverse pool of candidates. At any given time, thousands of people are interested in senior leadership positions in academe. But finding the ones who are qualified and a proverbial “good fit” for a particular opening is challenging to the extreme. Search firms, thus, are always looking for new talent to enter into their databases.

Even if you are not on the job market, it behooves you to send in your CV anyway to major search firms and follow up with a phone call to a partner or an associate. The introduction does not have to be complicated. Simply offer some variation of: “I’m happy here in my position at Large State University. But I want to get a sense of where I am in terms of my potential and what possibilities might be out there.”

Alternatively, you might simply ask a colleague — preferably a highly placed one — to nominate you, either in general or for a particular opening. In the latter case a formal, bullet-pointed nomination is best.

Listen to what they advise. Search firms have assessed thousands of people and CVs so will almost always give you a reasonably accurate snapshot of where you stand vis-a-vis where you want to go, whether your aspiration is specific (toward a certain opening) or speculative (as in, “I would like to be a dean”). They will also sketch out the market situation.

Obvious incompatibilities are easy to spot. If you have never held an administrative position of any kind, it is unlikely that a search firm, let alone a search committee, will place you as a strong contender for a deanship or a provostship.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nuances are a bit trickier. Suppose you are a department chair interested in becoming a dean. You have listed “some” fund-raising experience on your CV. The search consultants may suggest that your development record — measured against what they’ve seen in the past — is much less than that of many other potential candidates. And so on.

I have never heard of a search firm offering such insights in an insulting way. After all, you may not be “Dr. Right” at this moment, but you might be ideal for another position down the road. So hear out what the consultants have to say and mull it over carefully.

Don’t cover up a problem. No administrator has ever been universally popular with a spotless career. But some stumbles — a “no confidence” vote by the faculty, for example — are more serious than others.

What you share with the search firm is your call, but know this: There are very few secrets in academe. By the time search-committee members are deciding whom to invite (or not) to a campus visit, they already know a great deal about you. Your best course may be to opt for full disclosure with the search firm to give your side of the story. They might help make your case during internal meetings where your candidacy is reviewed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Learn what matters most to the campus. By the time an administrative position is officially announced, the search firm will have spent many hours talking and listening to people on the campus. From those conversations, the consultants will have a fix on what really matters to the various constituencies, and will play a crucial role in determining who gets picked for “airport interviews,” campus visits, and the position itself.

Most consultants will readily share some of those insights with you because of their eagerness to build a pool of strong candidates who perform at their best. Learning what most matters to the committee in a particular search can be incredibly helpful to you as a candidate — given the typically long list of required qualifications (sometimes dozens) attached to any administrative position. They are all listed there because the hiring profile emerged from a committee, but in truth some of them are vital while others are only the fond wish of a single committee member or a less-powerful constituency. So take note of what the consultants tell you about the priorities for the position.

Realize that they don’t always know. Last summer, I was contacted by a search firm about a university presidency position. I was not interested in the job nor am I on the market but, since I am always curious about how searches work, I was willing to learn more. I wondered aloud about the interim president, who was an extremely renowned nonacademic. The consultant assured me that the interim leader was merely there for the transition, and that the university’s board was definitely looking for an academic to be permanent president. A few months later, the interim leader was formally installed as president.

I don’t think I was lied to; the firm most likely believed the search was fair. But, to paraphrase Emily Dickinson (and Selena Gomez), the board wants what it wants — or it does not care.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nor is a search firm aware of every political variable at stake in every search. I have sat in front of search committees that were obviously and deeply divided — and started bickering right in front of me, the candidate. I have heard from other administrative candidates who witnessed committee members sit in stone-cold silence, express haughty indifference, and even come to near fisticuffs.

Search consultants can give you a reasonable assessment of what is most important on the campus, but they are not all-knowing. So do not expect them to tell you everything.

If you embark on the hunt for senior administrative positions, you will spend more time talking to search firms than to search committees. The hours are well spent: Savvy consultants will offer — if you are willing to listen — intimate tips about a position, about the general hiring market, and about how to be a better candidate for one campus and for all of them. Just always keep in mind their limitations and motivations.

David D. Perlmutter is a professor in and dean of the College of Media & Communication at Texas Tech University. He writes the “Career Confidential” advice column for The Chronicle. His book, Promotion and Tenure Confidential, was published by Harvard University Press in 2010.

A version of this article appeared in the March 24, 2017, issue.
Read other items in Admin 101.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Finance & Operations
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
David D. Perlmutter
About the Author
David D. Perlmutter
David D. Perlmutter is a professor in the College of Media & Communication at Texas Tech University. He stepped down as dean of the college in 2023 after holding the position since 2013. He writes the Admin 101 column for The Chronicle.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury
FILE -- University of Michigan President Santa Ono speaks during a Board of Regents meeting in Ann Arbor, Mich., Dec. 5, 2024. The University of Florida's new president will be Ono, a biomedical researcher lured from the top job at the University of Michigan with a large pay package, despite criticism of him that social conservatives raised.
The Review | Opinion
The Ruination of Santa Ono
By Silke-Maria Weineck

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin