Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    A Culture of Cybersecurity
    Opportunities in the Hard Sciences
    Career Preparation
Sign In
Illustration of a closeup of a 50s-era toy robot's feet near a smashed stone column, books and papers
Illustation by The Chronicle; iStock

AI May Ruin the University as We Know It

The existential threat of the newest wave of ed-tech.
The Review | Essay
By Matthew Kirschenbaum and Rita Raley October 31, 2024

A social-media post for a Google product known as NotebookLM outlines the following instructions to college students for “how to do school.” First, close your laptops, use your phone to record lectures, and write down only the important bits. Next, upload the recording and scans of any handwritten notes to Google. Finally, process the material through an executive summary generated by NotebookLM. An added perk, or shortcut, as the case may be: At the end of the week, generate a summary of the summaries in the form of a

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

A social-media post for a Google product known as NotebookLM outlines the following instructions to college students for “how to do school.” First, close your laptops, use your phone to record lectures, and write down only the important bits. Next, upload the recording and scans of any handwritten notes to Google. Finally, process the material through an executive summary generated by NotebookLM. An added perk, or shortcut, as the case may be: At the end of the week, generate a summary of the summaries in the form of a synthetic podcast narrated by a pair of conversational agents. No more extracting concepts from long-form arguments, no more psychic struggle with complex ideas: just autosummary on demand, made possible by a vast undifferentiated pool of content that every successive use of the service helps to grow.

Such is the ed-tech vision of higher education now. What the example of NotebookLM’s promotional campaign demonstrates is the emergence of a new model or template for education, if not for learning itself: a productivity schema ready to be laid across the full spectrum of the postindustrial knowledge economy. It is not difficult to see that in the next phase one can eliminate the lectures and discussions and simply start with the summaries (and eventually the summaries of the summaries), streamed on demand.

No more extracting concepts from long-form arguments, no more psychic struggle with complex ideas: just autosummary on demand.

This vision of the future of education is either dystopian or utopian, depending on one’s sympathies for the idea that the classroom must necessarily once again be disrupted to better serve students, and depending too on the stake one has in the industries that are going to profit from the enterprise. In addition to the obvious red flags — shouldn’t the plan encouraging students to record their professors and classmates be run by the legal department? — such breezy promotions of the next big thing in the AI-powered ed-tech domain point to a significant shift in the higher-education landscape, one that is different in both degree and kind from the previous hype cycles that brought us iClickers, MOOCs, courseware, and Second Life. All of these tools were discrete, online, on separate platforms. But today, AI feature sets are integrated in all of the core educational enterprise systems — Google, Canvas, Zoom, and Office to name a few — and the tools are not only ready to hand, but always on, perhaps even requiring admin privileges to disable. Not surprising, then, is the deluge of higher-education summits, white papers, ad hoc committees and task forces, along with the many new research centers, curricular initiatives, and cluster hires — all suggesting that institutions are rushing to demonstrate that they too are embracing the new way to “do school.”

Soon the question likely won’t just be one of individual students recording their classes, surreptitiously or otherwise. Consider all the third-party software licensing for course management and evaluation, as well as the new entrepreneurial ventures that entice budget-strapped schools with the promise that they no longer need to worry about building and supporting a technological infrastructure. From one of the many start-up companies that offer note-taking, transcription, and digitization services, an exemplary corporate pitch: Because you lack both equipment and staff, we will remotely operate the cameras in your lecture hall so that you can meet the updated legal requirements for remote access. In exchange, we are going to store those lectures on our servers and use them to train our in-house language models — access to which we will then be able to license to you in the next funding cycle, when you are ready to add our premium transcription services to your subscription.

In essence, the university itself has become a service. The idea of the University as a Service extends the model of Software as a Service to education. Software as a Service refers to the practice of businesses licensing software and paying to renew the license rather than owning and maintaining the software for themselves. For the University as a Service, traditional academic institutions provide the lecturers, content, and degrees (for now). In return, the technological infrastructure, instructional delivery, and support services are all outsourced to third-party vendors and digital platforms.

Licensing and subscription agreements favor short-term budget planning; so too do they enable an administrative vision of universities as customizable, scalable, cost effective, and available on demand. Too often the decision-making about the IT systems that will shape the research and instructional environments is largely or even exclusively in the hands of CIOs, IT staff members, and instructional development, with academic affairs relegated to the position of managing the implementation of commercial ed-tech applications that promise continuous pedagogic improvement, which is now to be accelerated by new AI features, all of them generating revenue through the scraping of data. As with other industries like health care, the “service” that the university now provides is the concentration of human capital and engagement for the magnitude of data collection necessary to the continued growth and financial viability of AI systems.

Traditional academic institutions provide the lecturers, content, and degrees (for now). In return, the technological infrastructure, instructional delivery, and support services are all outsourced to third-party vendors and digital platforms.

Academic leaders in what positions of authority remain — holding on to governance offices, seated on the relevant committees, presumably able to transmit messages to the right sets of ears — may try to forestall these developments. But it is unlikely to be that simple. The firewalls are coming down, and the doors of the institution are open, not only to lifelong learners and citizen scientists but to start-up hucksters and the flash mobs mobilized in the culture war that is also a cold civil war. If it is true that the future belongs to crowds, it seems clear by now it will be less a valorous multitude than the malign cults of personality that accrete around billionaires, politicians, billionaire-politicians, celebrities, and other influencers, all targeted and manipulated by the outrage merchants who command the largest and most lethal followings on social media.

Recall here one of the promises of NotebookLM: It can ingest content directly from YouTube. To the extent LLMs continue to be trained on the torrents of platforms like 4Chan, Reddit, and X, as well as YouTube, the positions and agendas expressed therein will be imported directly into future machine-learning models. Those models will then be iterated, localized, and branded — complete with mascot imagery — before being sold off to individual institutions as boutique products vertically integrated with campus services, from marketing and communications to health and public safety. What this looks like for the several large public colleges and universities currently piloting or plotting exactly such services may initially appear relatively benign; but we wonder what it will look like at the growing list of places already overtly subject to ideological capture: The systems and campuses that find themselves deep in the red, whether politically, financially, or, as is often the case, both.

What to do with the remains of the day? Some will no doubt wish to declare crisis bankruptcy. We do not begrudge them — crisis is its own industry, and we are not crisis managers. None of what we diagnose is a function of claims about the technology or its capabilities as such, but rather the way in which the technology is symptomatic of latent logics and transformations that have long been underway. Put another way: If AI didn’t exist, it would be necessary to invent it.

This essay is adapted from the article “AI and the University as a Service” in PMLA. Reprinted with permission.

A version of this article appeared in the November 15, 2024, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Technology Innovation & Transformation Scholarship & Research
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Matthew Kirschenbaum is distinguished university professor of English at the University of Maryland at College Park.
About the Author
Rita Raley
Rita Raley is a professor of English at the University of California at Santa Barbara.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Illustration showing three classical columns on stacks of coins, at different heights due to the amount of coins stacked underneath
Data
These 35 Colleges Could Take a Financial Hit Under Republicans’ Expanded Endowment Tax
Illustration showing details of a U.S. EEOC letter to Harvard U.
Bias Allegations
Faculty Hiring Is Under Federal Scrutiny at Harvard
Illustration showing nontraditional students: a pregnant worman, a soldier; a working professional; an elderly man; and a woman with an artificial leg
'Unique Needs'
Common App Takes an In-Depth Look at Independent Students
Photo-based illustration of a Sonoma State University clock structure that's fallen into a hole in a $100 bill.
Campus Crossroads
Sonoma State U. Is Making Big Cuts to Close a Budget Hole. What Will Be Left?

From The Review

Solomon-0512 B.jpg
The Review | Essay
The Conscience of a Campus Conservative
By Daniel J. Solomon
Illustration depicting a pendulum with a red ball featuring a portion of President Trump's face to the left about to strike balls showing a group of protesters.
The Review | Opinion
Trump Is Destroying DEI With the Same Tools That Built It
By Noliwe M. Rooks
Illustration showing two men and giant books, split into two sides—one blue and one red. The two men are reaching across the center color devide to shake hands.
The Review | Opinion
Left and Right Agree: Higher Ed Needs to Change
By Michael W. Clune

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin