Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
Admissions

An Alleged Admissions-Bribery Scheme Is Roiling Higher Ed. Here’s How It Worked.

By Andy Thomason March 12, 2019
A company used “side doors” to gain admission for its clients’ children to elite colleges, according to prosecutors at the U.S. Department of Justice.
A company used “side doors” to gain admission for its clients’ children to elite colleges, according to prosecutors at the U.S. Department of Justice.Jon Elswick, AP Images

The U.S. Department of Justice has charged dozens of people with illegally clearing their children’s way to admission at elite universities through bribery, according to documents unsealed on Tuesday.

News of the indictments has sent a shock wave through higher ed. Here’s how the bribery scheme is alleged to have worked, based solely on a supporting affidavit filed in the case.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

A company used “side doors” to gain admission for its clients’ children to elite colleges, according to prosecutors at the U.S. Department of Justice.
A company used “side doors” to gain admission for its clients’ children to elite colleges, according to prosecutors at the U.S. Department of Justice.Jon Elswick, AP Images

The U.S. Department of Justice has charged dozens of people with illegally clearing their children’s way to admission at elite universities through bribery, according to documents unsealed on Tuesday.

News of the indictments has sent a shock wave through higher ed. Here’s how the bribery scheme is alleged to have worked, based solely on a supporting affidavit filed in the case.

There’s one main entity you need to know about: The Edge College & Career Network, LLC, known informally as “The Key.” Clients of the Key included parents who wanted to ensure that their children were admitted to elite colleges. A cooperating witness, identified in the affidavit as Rick Singer, the Key’s founder, described the scheme, broadly, like this:

What we do is we help the wealthiest families in the U.S. get their kids into school … They want guarantees, they want this thing done. They don’t want to be messing around with this thing. And so they want in at certain schools. So I did what I would call, “side doors.” There is a front door which means you get in on your own. The back door is through institutional advancement, which is 10 times as much money. And I’ve created this side door in. Because the back door, when you go through institutional advancement, as you know, everybody’s got a friend of a friend, who knows somebody who knows somebody, but there’s no guarantee, they’re just gonna give you a second look. My families want a guarantee.

Collage of admissions-bribery scheme, March 2019, w/o caption
Admission Through the ‘Side Door’
Dozens of people, including famous actors, college coaches, and a university administrator, have been charged by federal prosecutors for their alleged roles in an admissions-bribery scheme involving Yale, Stanford, and other elite institutions.
  • One Year After College-Admissions Scandal, 3 Questions About What (if Anything) Has Changed
  • 5 Questions to Consider in the Wake of the Admissions Scandal
  • The Bribery Scandal Revealed Holes in Admissions Oversight. Now Some Professors Want to Take Back That Role.

The Key used several “side doors.” One was through college-entrance examinations like the SAT and the ACT. Clients were told to have their children ask to extend the time in which they took the tests, sometimes by claiming to have learning disabilities. That tended to give the students an “individualized setting” in which to take the tests. The Key would then bribe officials overseeing those settings to let someone else take an exam in a student’s place. Clients would pay $15,000 to $75,000 per test for that service. The resulting fraudulent scores were submitted to colleges.

Another “side door” was through athletic designation. From 2011 to 2018, parents paid the Key about $25 million to bribe coaches and administrators to identify the parents’ children as recruited athletes, thereby giving them a leg up in the admissions process. Coaches are typically granted a certain number of “admissions slots” in which they alert the admissions office to their teams’ needs; coaches who accepted the Key’s bribes agreed to designate one “slot” to an applicant even though he or she was not a recruited athlete. (The Key created fake athletic “profiles” for those students, even going so far as to Photoshop their faces onto the bodies of real athletes.)

According to the Justice Department, coaches at Georgetown, Stanford, Wake Forest, and Yale Universities and the University of Southern California, among others, have been implicated in the scheme.

The Key concealed all of the payments by funneling them through a nonprofit organization, the Key Worldwide Foundation, whose executive director is Singer.

The foundation was open about how it conducted business, though it cast its efforts as on behalf of underrepresented students.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The Key Worldwide Foundation endeavors to provide education that would normally be unattainable to underprivileged students, not only attainable but realistic,” its mission statement reads. “Our contributions to major athletic university programs may help to provide placement to students that may not have access under normal channels.”

Universities named in the affidavit are also listed among the foundation’s grantees in its Form 990, the disclosure it is required to file with the Internal Revenue Service. Southern California and the University of Texas at Austin, for example, are each listed as having received a total of more than a half-million dollars between 2014 and 2016.

Read more Chronicle coverage, and read the supporting affidavit in full.

Dan Bauman contributed to this report.

Andy Thomason is a senior editor at The Chronicle. Send him a tip at andy.thomason@chronicle.com. And follow him on Twitter @arthomason.

Read other items in Admission Through the ‘Side Door’.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Admissions & Enrollment Innovation & Transformation
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Thomason_Andy.jpg
About the Author
Andy Thomason
Andy Thomason is an assistant managing editor at The Chronicle and the author of the book Discredited: The UNC Scandal and College Athletics’ Amateur Ideal.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Mangan-Censorship-0610.jpg
Academic Freedom
‘A Banner Year for Censorship’: More States Are Restricting Classroom Discussions on Race and Gender
On the day of his retirement party, Bob Morse poses for a portrait in the Washington, D.C., offices of U.S. News and World Report in June 2025. Morse led the magazine's influential and controversial college rankings efforts since its inception in 1988. Michael Theis, The Chronicle.
List Legacy
‘U.S. News’ Rankings Guru, Soon to Retire, Reflects on the Role He’s Played in Higher Ed
Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits
Photo illustration showing a figurine of a football player with a large price tag on it.
Athletics
Loans, Fees, and TV Money: Where Colleges Are Finding the Funds to Pay Athletes

From The Review

A stack of coins falling over. Motion blur. Falling economy concept. Isolated on white.
The Review | Opinion
Will We Get a More Moderate Endowment Tax?
By Phillip Levine
Photo illustration of a classical column built of paper, with colored wires overtaking it like vines of ivy
The Review | Essay
The Latest Awful EdTech Buzzword: “Learnings”
By Kit Nicholls
William F. Buckley, Jr.
The Review | Interview
William F. Buckley Jr. and the Origins of the Battle Against ‘Woke’
By Evan Goldstein

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: A Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin