Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
The Chronicle Review

Ancient Chinese Wisdom on Modern Western Dilemmas

By Carlin Romano June 5, 2016
“Wisdom” in Chinese
“Wisdom” in Chinese

Do-gooders of all sorts ask, “What would Jesus do?” Supreme Court justices scratch their heads in the face of modern legal puzzles and wonder, “What would the Framers think?” Orthodox Jews muse over what a great medieval rabbi, a Rashi or Rambam, might have made of Snapchatting on the Sabbath.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Do-gooders of all sorts ask, “What would Jesus do?” Supreme Court justices scratch their heads in the face of modern legal puzzles and wonder, “What would the Framers think?” Orthodox Jews muse over what a great medieval rabbi, a Rashi or Rambam, might have made of Snapchatting on the Sabbath.

Who, though, asks, “What would the great Chinese philosophers say?”

Until now, not a lot of folks in the West.

REVIEW

The Path: What Chinese Philosophers Can Teach Us About the Good Life
By Michael Puett and Christine Gross-Loh

(Simon & Schuster)

Scholars of Chinese philosophy, of course, zap one another over what Confucius, Mencius, and other ancient Chinese stalwarts really meant in regard to the provocative topics and vignettes they actually addressed: a toddler falling into a well, a butcher slicing meat, sons respecting fathers. And one assumes that ordinary Chinese throughout history, pondering whether to give a seat on the mule cart or the subway to an elderly person, have paid some mind to what their sages might advise.

But aside from idiosyncratic examples — the “What Would Confucius Do?” advice column that runs in the English-language That’s Beijing magazine, or feisty conversations among academic China hands about what Confucius would think of President Xi’s selective bearhugs of Confucian principles — asking contemporary guidance from the Chinese greats has not been a growth industry.

That makes The Path: What Chinese Philosophers Can Teach Us About the Good Life, by Michael Puett and Christine Gross-Loh, a welcome and unusual book. Its genesis rests in the enormous teaching success of Puett, a professor of Chinese history at Harvard. His freshman survey course on Chinese philosophy now ranks as the most popular humanities class on the campus, requiring the august venue of Sanders Theatre to accommodate its 700-plus regulars.

In 2013, The Atlantic published an article on the course by Gross-Loh. Trade publishers presumably sniffed the possibility that Puett, like that other philosophical strider of the Sanders stage, Michael Sandel, might present real breakout potential. (The Path is coming out in 26 countries.)

Puett comes paired with Gross-Loh herself, a freelance writer and Ph.D. from Harvard in East Asian history. Puett’s own previous books, among them To Become a God: Cosmology, Sacrifice, and Self-Divinization in Early China (Harvard University Press, 2002), and The Ambivalence of Creation: Debates Concerning Innovation and Artifice in Early China (Stanford University Press, 2002) — both full of the scholarly brilliance and sophisticated sentences that got Puett where he is — possibly convinced all concerned that some yin-yang authorship was in order.

In their acknowledgments, the authors call the book “a true collaboration: the discussions of the philosophers were developed in Michael’s class, while Christine added in modern-day examples and wrote about the ideas of these thinkers for a contemporary audience.”

The result? A remarkable combination of self-help guide and iconoclastic take on ancient Chinese wisdom. While the book urges one to set aside the Western inclination to analyze matters into crisp distinctions, it’s hard not to react to it in a binary way: first as a source book on living a wise life, and second as an interpretation of Chinese philosophy, even while the two agendas appear to influence each other.

Puett and Gross-Loh focus, for instance, on five ancient philosophers: Confucius, Mencius, Mozi, Zhuangzi, and Xunzi. Noticeably absent is Han Feizi, sometimes dubbed the “Chinese Machiavelli,” a proponent of brutal punishment of any official who misbehaved even slightly. (He would not have been troubled by mass incarceration and might have beheaded President Obama for freeing minor drug offenders.) Was Han Feizi too downbeat for a book that sees ancient Chinese philosophy as almost wholly a fount of appealing approaches to life? The question inevitably occurs of whether the “Look here for the good life!” part of the project too much influences the assessment of the broader subject.

The book is a remarkable combination of self-help guide and iconoclastic take on ancient Chinese wisdom.

That said, the authors superbly succeed at highlighting ancient Chinese philosophy’s tools for achieving its vision of a flourishing life. They particularly startle with the radical argument that “ritual,” widely recognized as crucial to Confucianism, and usually seen as a mark of its “rigid social hierarchy, strict gender roles, and … conservative emphasis on correct behavior,” amounts to a form of liberating “as if” experimentation. One example is ancestor worship, which involves thinking of one’s forebears as present. Ritual can, the authors contend, break people out of narrow notions of the self and set them on a “transformative” personal “way,” or “path,” to a good life.

ADVERTISEMENT

So, too, the authors explain, Chinese philosophers discard the “authentic,” “single, unified” self that anchors so much of Western individualism. That eases the task of “cultivation,” or creation of one’s character, that ancient Chinese philosophers largely embrace. The philosophers also mostly resist abstract, Kantian-style universal laws in ethics, ever sensitive to context and situation. And they mainly accept the importance of emotion and instinct in decision making, a matter on which Western thinkers, prodded by neuroscience, are finally catching up.

Yet, Puett and Gross-Loh make plain, ancient Chinese philosophers disagreed sharply on some issues, as Xunzi and Mencius did on the latter’s belief that human nature is basically good. Gross-Loh’s assigned task, well performed, connects ancient viewpoints to a score of real-world problems we face today, from choosing a college major to dealing with a difficult boss.

On the first day of “Classical Chinese Ethical and Political Theory” each year, according to Gross-Loh in her separately written foreword, Puett makes a bold promise to students: “If you take the ideas in these texts seriously, they will change your life.”

Readers of The Path should not interpret that “if” in too exclusionary a sense. The authors themselves remark at one stage, in regard to a swatch of useful Chinese wisdom, that “all this is common sense.” Their important point is that it’s more common among ancient Chinese thinkers than among 21st-century Westerners.

ADVERTISEMENT

At the same time, the authors rightly stress that Westerners practice their own transformative rituals, from saying “I love you” to playing hide-and-seek with their kids. And it’s striking how much of the excellent Chinese wisdom Puett and Gross-Loh impart — recognition of the world as “fractured and fragmented,” of concepts as often blurry, of knowledge and wisdom as best extracted from quotidian actions — enjoys equal backing from such rebels against the analytic Western tradition as the later Wittgenstein and American pragmatists like Peirce, James, and Dewey.

The authors want credit given where credit is due but also emphasize that, in the end, “none of what we are looking at should be considered ‘Chinese’ views as opposed to ‘Western’ ones.” Good ideas should flourish everywhere.

Confucius famously declared in the Analects, “I transmit, but do not innovate.” Puett and Gross-Loh deftly do both.

Carlin Romano, critic at large for The Chronicle, is a professor of philosophy and humanities at Ursinus College and author of America the Philosophical (Knopf, 2012).

A version of this article appeared in the June 10, 2016, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Carlin Romano
Carlin Romano, former critic at large for The Chronicle, is a professor of philosophy and humanities at Ursinus College and author of America the Philosophical (Knopf, 2012).
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

What Do Millennial Students Really Need? More Confucius
Dao Rising: Chinese Philosophy Lifts Off in America
The Toxic History of Philosophy’s Racism

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin