Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Commentary

Area-Studies Centers Are Vital but Vulnerable

By Anna Grzymala-Busse September 30, 2013
Area-Studies Centers Are Vital but Vulnerable 1
Michael Morgenstern for The Chronicle

The crisis in Syria continues to shock our consciences, Egypt has lurched from revolution to the Muslim Brotherhood to military rule, and Russia grows steadily more autocratic. Yet our understanding of these foreign-policy challenges, and of the world itself, is increasingly at risk, hobbled by short-sighted policies of the federal government.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The crisis in Syria continues to shock our consciences, Egypt has lurched from revolution to the Muslim Brotherhood to military rule, and Russia grows steadily more autocratic. Yet our understanding of these foreign-policy challenges, and of the world itself, is increasingly at risk, hobbled by short-sighted policies of the federal government.

As the academic year gets under way, and as Congress begins debate on the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act, programs designed specifically to deepen our knowledge of foreign countries are under threat because of deep cuts in federal financing by the Department of Education. For decades, these programs—known as area-studies centers—have focused on specific geographic regions of critical scholarly and policy importance. The centers have supported our understanding of parts of the world as different and as vital as East Asia, the Middle East and North Africa, Latin America, Southeast Asia, the Pacific Islands, Russia and Eastern Europe, and sub-Saharan Africa.

The government supports area studies through the Title VI National Resource Centers, 125 of which exist on private and public university campuses across the country. Run by faculty, the centers are an integral part of their universities, offering master’s-degree programs and language instruction, organizing lectures and events, and bringing together faculty and students from many departments and disciplines to focus on the many cultural, economic, political, and societal aspects of a region.

Title VI centers were initially financed at the federal level through Title VI of the National Defense Education Act (and later through Title VI of the Higher Education Act of 1965) in response to a crisis: the Soviet launch of the Sputnik satellite. At the time, the government recognized the need to expand and deepen America’s knowledge of strategically important areas of the world—to be able to truly understand our neighbors, both near and far away. This need still exists and is at least as pressing as ever.

These centers have been crucial to understanding the politics, societies, literatures, economics, and cultural heritage of countries from Azerbaijan to Zambia. They have supported the study of infrequently taught languages, from Albanian to Gujarati to Zulu, both by providing scholarships to university students for language study and by subsidizing the salaries of language faculty at their universities. They offer graduate fellowships, course offerings, speaker lectures, community events, and scholarly conferences, all of which have deepened our knowledge of countries and peoples we would rarely have encountered otherwise. They have ensured that whole generations of diplomats, scholars, business leaders, and other global experts and practitioners could gain the knowledge they needed.

Yet despite the enormous foreign-policy challenges of the post-9/11 era and the administration’s stated commitment to quality education, the centers became a victim of budgetary quid pro quos. During budget negotiations with Congress, the Department of Education agreed to deep cuts: The National Resource Centers’ federal allocation alone was nearly halved in 2011, going from $34-million in 2010 to $18-million in 2011, and shows no signs of being restored. This is a pittance in the Department of Education’s discretionary budget of more than $68-billion.

The consequences of this intellectual myopia are predictable: Area-studies programs are struggling in the United States. Centers are threatened with closure, and they have shut down programs and limited language study. Within a year of the cuts—before budget reserves ran out and the full impact of the cuts was felt—a survey by the Council of National Resource Center Directors found that language classes had been canceled at 28 percent of polled institutions, and at 84 percent of campuses where language allocations were reduced, the host universities had not made up lost funds. At a time when we need to ensure that Americans can take their rightful place as citizens of the world, these budget cuts sentence new generations of university and high-school students to parochial and limited futures.

The real cost, however, will be paid in the longer term: Knowledge of foreign languages and cultures is critical to national security and economic competitiveness. For all the talk of globalization and flat worlds, pundits and policy makers are reduced to shallow and often misleading analyses and facile conclusions without a solid grounding in regional empirical realities.

It was area-studies experts and academics like Juan Cole, at the University of Michigan, who warned that the invasion of Iraq would be anything but easy, and it was area-studies faculty who were then sought by the government to provide the military with a greater understanding of on-the-ground politics, as in the Human Terrain System initiative. Others, like Quintan Wiktorowicz, are working within the administration to counter extremism and terrorism. Experts like these are a valuable resource today as the country debates American policy toward the world’s hot spots.

Shocked by the Department of Education’s complacency, private donors and foundations have helped, especially in ensuring that foreign languages will continue to be taught at universities. For example, here at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, the former ambassador Ronald Weiser and his wife, Eileen, have provided funds for the Weiser Center for Europe and Eurasia, and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation has supported language study. Yet such generosity cannot make up for the shortfall nationwide, and cannot effectively counter the administration’s seeming willingness to hinder our understanding of the world, both now and in the future.

Anna Grzymala-Busse is a professor of political science and director of the Weiser Center for Emerging Democracies at the University of Michigan.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin