Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Student Housing
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Technology

As Big Data Comes to College, Officials Wrestle to Set New Ethical Norms

By Goldie Blumenstyk June 28, 2016
Colleges are amassing reams of student data, ripe for mining and analysis. Do students have a right to know how the information is being used, and should they be permitted to opt out of the collection process?
Colleges are amassing reams of student data, ripe for mining and analysis. Do students have a right to know how the information is being used, and should they be permitted to opt out of the collection process?Getty Images/iStock Photo

A week before classes begin at the University of Maryland University College, students can start poking around the online course materials. Some do, looking over the syllabus and getting a feel for the subject, but others don’t bother. It turns out that with just a little number crunching of that pre-course behavior, university officials can make some surprisingly accurate predictions about who will flourish and who will flounder.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Colleges are amassing reams of student data, ripe for mining and analysis. Do students have a right to know how the information is being used, and should they be permitted to opt out of the collection process?
Colleges are amassing reams of student data, ripe for mining and analysis. Do students have a right to know how the information is being used, and should they be permitted to opt out of the collection process?Getty Images/iStock Photo

A week before classes begin at the University of Maryland University College, students can start poking around the online course materials. Some do, looking over the syllabus and getting a feel for the subject, but others don’t bother. It turns out that with just a little number crunching of that pre-course behavior, university officials can make some surprisingly accurate predictions about who will flourish and who will flounder.

“We know the day before the course starts which students are highly unlikely to succeed,” says Marie Cini, provost at UMUC, where most of the 60,000 undergraduates take courses online.

Colleges are increasingly awash in information and so-called clickstream data about their students — much of it ripe to be mined and analyzed. Data is becoming ubiquitous thanks to advances in analytics software, a slew of new personalized-learning and student-success companies, and course-management platforms that collect and analyze students’ online interactions. The promise is that colleges can use such data to improve retention and help students graduate.

But as more colleges experiment, they’re facing complex questions about what to do with the findings the data-crunching reveals.

What, if anything, should students be told about the judgments institutions are making about them from the data footprints they’re leaving behind? Should companies be able to profit from that data? And should students have the right to opt out of being monitored?

Just as a new medical finding can create standards by which doctors provide care to their patients, does having such information establish a new standard of care for colleges?

“We are entering a new era of data and data responsibility,” says Mitchell Stevens, an associate professor in Stanford University’s Graduate School of Education who has long pushed for ethical standards around educational data that go beyond legal issues of privacy or security. In an era of ubiquitous data, he says, colleges need to decide: “Are we acting responsibly as educators? What values are we trying to pursue and preserve?”

Those were also some of the questions Mr. Stevens put front and center this month at a private convening of several dozen academics and a smattering of ed-tech company and foundation leaders.

Sponsored by Stanford and Ithaka S+R, a nonprofit education consultancy, the meeting at the Asilomar Conference Grounds, in California, was designed, in the words of its website, to produce “succinct statements to inform institutional, national, and global policies regarding the research, application, and representation of adult student data.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The group has no formal authority, but it is building on precedent. In 2014, in the wake of MOOC mania, Mr. Stevens and others met at Asilomar and established principles to guide research using student data while respecting the rights of students and the “humanity of learning.” Those principles were prompted by concerns that colleges and MOOC providers were collecting reams of digital data about the hundreds of thousands of people signing up for MOOCs. But since most of those students weren’t enrolled in the institutions offering the courses, there were no clear guidelines governing how the data could be used.

Flood of Data

This month’s meeting, Asilomar II, was focused more directly on how institutions treat their own students — and the flood of data they generate every time they log in to a course-management system to turn in an assignment or answer a quiz in a digital textbook equipped with “personalized learning” software.

The group’s findings won’t be formally released until August, but Mr. Stevens and his co-organizer, Martin Kurzweil, director of the Educational Transformation Program at Ithaka S+R, provided The Chronicle with a rough summary of the conclusions. Among them:

  • Student data collected into analytics programs should be thought of as a joint venture, where the students, institutions, instructors, and — where they are involved — third parties all need to have a shared understanding of how the information is used, including when it is developed as a revenue source for colleges or companies.
  • Data-analytics programs and products should be designed with “transparency,” especially in cases where an algorithm in the analytical software makes decisions about what happens next to a student; those decisions should be explainable and appealable.
  • Educators using data analytics have a responsibility to take action based on what they learn from their data analysis, a principle that the group called “informed improvement.”
  • Decisions and discussions about the ethical use of data analytics need to be under “continuous consideration” that, ideally, is embedded in an explicit governance process.
  • Colleges relying on data analytics, and particularly tools that use information to predict student outcomes, should ensure that students have “open futures.” As Mr. Stevens put it: “Education should create opportunity. It shouldn’t foreclose it.”

Participants at Asilomar II noted that the explosion in data analytics will also create new ethical issues around students’ transcripts and other official academic records that colleges have traditionally stewarded. With today’s predictive-analytical tools, colleges could conceivably calculate a student’s likelihood of graduation and make that prediction part of the academic record, says Mr. Kurzweil, “but should you?”

ADVERTISEMENT

The group also spent a lot of time considering ways to ensure that student data remains useful to academic researchers. Today, says Mr. Kurzweil, too many institutions are organized in ways that actually inhibit such research. Many still keep their data in silos that can’t or don’t connect with one another, he says, or they use commercial products where the key information about student learning is controlled by a proprietary “black box” algorithm that’s off limits to outside researchers. At many institutions, he says, instructors still have “absolutely sovereignty” in their classrooms, so there is little compelling them to collect or share data that could inform educational research.

‘It’s Evolving’

The debate over data and privacy recently played out at the Open University, in England. The largely online institution tracks its 126,000 undergraduates daily on how far they’re progressing in their courses and other metrics. Last year officials there considered an opt-out policy after instituting a major effort to use learning-analytics data to intervene more actively with its students.

The internal debate, says Sharon Slade, who took part, was “a tussle between the obligation to act and recognizing the student as an adult.” She’s a senior lecturer and regional manager in the faculty of business and law.

Are we acting responsibly as educators? What values are we trying to pursue and preserve?

After about a year of spirited debate, officials decided on a policy of disclosure instead.

ADVERTISEMENT

But even so, Ms. Slade is quick to acknowledge that the disclosure policy goes only so far. “Do we describe in the policy the complete range of activities? Probably not,” she allows, “because it’s evolving.” (The Open University’s policy, along with other relevant documents, can be found on Asilomar’s resources page.)

Many of those at the Asilomar meeting were chosen because they or their institutions have been wrestling with these issues.

Take UMUC and what it knows about students who don’t log in early, for example. Ms. Cini says the university has been experimenting with various kinds of automatic alerts or “nudges” to students to see what works best to encourage them. “You don’t want to just start throwing data at people,” she says. “It can be very overwhelming.”

The institution developed the insights about those who log on from its work with Civitas Learning, one of several new data-analytics companies. It is also part of the PAR Framework, a consortium of institutions that collect and share data about students’ progress. And in some of the university’s economics courses, students use an adaptive-learning product called Waymaker, developed by a company called Lumen Learning.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ms. Cini says UMUC is already abiding by the “informed improvement” principle articulated by the group; based on what it has learned from the PAR Framework, officials have been redesigning a number of courses to reduce withdrawal rates. Having the data does create a different standard of care, she says. “If you know this, you have to do something.”

Yet one thing UMUC doesn’t do is explicitly explain to its students how deeply their data is being mined. Unlike the 11-page Open University policy, UMUC says only: “Unless otherwise notified, information provided to the university may be shared among offices within the university and with the University System of Maryland and outside entities as necessary or appropriate in the conduct of legitimate university business and consistent with applicable law.”

Ms. Slade, at the Open University, says she believes in the usefulness of data analytics, but she wishes her institution had gone with the opt-out provision. “They are adults, she says. “We shouldn’t treat them as children.”

Students at the Open University were consulted extensively during that decision-making process. Many of them didn’t realize the extent to which their data was being collected, says Ms. Slade, and some were “horrified by it.” The president of the student association, Ruth Tudor, says, however, that once students were made aware of the potential support that could be offered, they were “satisfied that they would not be pushed in any one direction.” She credits the university’s consultative process with easing anxieties.

ADVERTISEMENT

For Lumen Learning, the company that developed the Waymaker product, the ethical challenge is less about disclosure to its more than 6,000 student users at UMUC and 11 other institutions — each student is asked to sign a consent form — and more about how to ensure that the tool is put to the best use. Studies of the product show that when professors send customizable prompts to students saying things like, “nice job,” the students perform better.

Knowing that, says Julie Curtis, Lumen’s vice president for strategy and communication, “we feel this obligation to let instructors know and strongly encourage them” to use it. Until now, she says, Lumen has made the prompts optional but has emphasized their importance during instructor training. But now she wonders if following one of the principles of Asilomar II — that, once a practice is found to work, it should be used — means that Lumen and other companies should set the feature as a default.

Goldie Blumenstyk writes about the intersection of business and higher education. Check out www.goldieblumenstyk.com for information on her new book about the higher-education crisis; follow her on Twitter @GoldieStandard; or email her at goldie@chronicle.com.

Join the conversation about this article on the Re:Learning Facebook page.

Read other items in Mapping the New Education Landscape.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Technology
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Blumenstyk_Goldie.jpg
About the Author
Goldie Blumenstyk
The veteran reporter Goldie Blumenstyk writes a weekly newsletter, The Edge, about the people, ideas, and trends changing higher education. Find her on Twitter @GoldieStandard. She is also the author of the bestselling book American Higher Education in Crisis? What Everyone Needs to Know.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

As Big-Data Companies Come to Teaching, a Pioneer Issues a Warning
Companies Promise ‘Personalized Education’

More News

UCLA students, researchers and demonstrators rally during a "Kill the Cuts" protest against the Trump administration's funding cuts on research, health and higher education at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) in Los Angeles on April 8, 2025.
Scholarship & Research
Trump Proposed Slashing the National Science Foundation’s Budget. A Key Senate Committee Just Refused.
Illustration of a steamroller rolling over a colorful road and leaving gray asphalt in its wake.
Newly Updated
Oregon State U. Will End a Renowned Program That Aimed to Reduce Bias in Hiring
Dr. Gregory Washington, president of George Mason University.
Another probe
George Mason President Discriminated Against White People After George Floyd Protests, Justice Dept. Says
Protesters gather outside the Department of Education headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 14, 2025 to protest the Trump administrations cuts at the agency.
An Uncertain Future
The Education Dept. Got a Green Light to Shrink. Here Are 3 Questions About What’s Next.

From The Review

Photo-based illustration with repeated images of a student walking, in the pattern of a graph trending down, then up.
The Review | Opinion
7 Ways Community Colleges Can Boost Enrollment
By Bob Levey
Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin