Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Advice

Ask the Chair: When Is a ‘Reply All’ Email an Act of Aggression?

Advice for a department head who is uncertain whether a pattern of cc’d emails is well-intentioned or toxic.

By Kevin Dettmar June 5, 2023
illustration of a computer, desk, chair, and bookshelf
Sam Kalda for The Chronicle

Note: In the “Ask the Chair” series, the author of How to Chair a Department answers your questions about departmental leadership. Send your queries via Twitter, Facebook, or email. Read previous columns here.

Question: There are a few faculty members in my department who like to copy everyone in the department on emails that are directed to me, the chair. I am not sure what the intention is of including the entire department in an email to the chair on matters that, at times, do not involve all of the faculty.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Note: In the “Ask the Chair” series, the author of How to Chair a Department answers your questions about departmental leadership. Send your queries via Twitter, Facebook, or email. Read previous columns here.

Question: A few faculty members in my department like to copy everyone in the department on emails directed to me, the chair. I’m not sure what the intention is of including the entire department in an email to the chair on matters that, at times, do not involve all of the faculty.

Should I consider this habit of theirs a form of transparency or toxicity? What can chairs do when this happens repeatedly?

Signed,
Lost at CC:

Dear CC: Writer,
(Sorry, I couldn’t resist responding to a pun with one of my own — a nod to Mitch Ryder & the Detroit Wheels.)

I’ll confess that I’m prone to overreading (perhaps an occupational hazard for an English professor), and your letter is tantalizingly short on details, which makes me want to read between the lines. Your phrasing suggests that (a) this mass-email habit is not an unusual occurrence, and (b) more than one of your faculty colleagues participates. So I suspect, as you do, that we have a problem here.

Rather than a case of inadvertent “reply all,” this sounds like we’re talking about a passive-aggressive pattern in which emails that are drafted and sent to you as the primary decision maker and recipient are, for some reason, copied to a whole host of others in the department.

Folks who engage in such a practice do so for one of two reasons (though perhaps there are others I’m not thinking of).

The first — irritating at times, but the less harmful of the two — is akin to what some call “virtue signaling.” Say, for instance, “Professor Smith” is writing to let you know that the article he’s been working on for two years has been accepted for publication. Rather than letting the chair alone know — perhaps because Smith is not confident that you’ll do his bragging for him, as he thinks you should — this professor has not-so-stealthily looped in everyone else in the department on the news. It’s the sort of thing that, as chair, you may laugh and roll your eyes at privately, but then you can easily let it go.

ADVERTISEMENT

Reason No. 2 is more troubling because it borders, I would say, on a kind of soft bullying. In this case, our hypothetical Professor Smith sends a departmentwide email that says something like: “Hey Chair, Where are the CVs for our visiting job candidates that you promised to send?” This time, Smith is none too subtly letting you know that he thinks you’ve screwed up — and wants everyone else to know, too.

I have felt bullied in this way by a colleague who wasn’t happy about a decision I’d made, and let me know in a blistering email. Which they also sent to every member of the department. And the vice president for academic affairs. And the college president.

My immediate reaction — because I’m a human being, not a monster — was humiliation. As I scraped myself up off the floor, though, I realized that my colleague was the one who should be embarrassed, not me, and that the other recipients of the email would read the situation that way, too. (The notes I received shortly after from colleagues — private emails, copied to no one — confirmed that.)

If you believe that your colleagues’ reply-all behavior has this purpose — that the emails are less about trying to solve problems, and more about undermining your leadership — it probably isn’t going to do any good to speak to them about it individually. They’re trolling you, and all you would do by raising the issue is play into their hands.

ADVERTISEMENT

It would be tempting, or at least I would be tempted, to fight fire with fire. You could use “reply all” to write something like, “I’m waiting on the final CV but expect it to arrive later today, when I’ll send them all out. Is there some reason this went to the whole department?” But probably best to resist that approach too, as it’s rarely a good idea to bully (or in this case, attempt to humiliate) a bully.

I’m going to suggest a more-politic variation on that strategy. When I received that email that went out to seemingly everyone in my college’s org chart, I wasn’t the only one who was annoyed — I learned that my dean was, too. I wish I’d had the presence of mind to ask her to deal with the situation in a reply-all email, or to just send a private note to let the original emailer know that airing such a petty complaint to an audience of innocent and unwilling bystanders was inappropriate and unwelcome. This is just one of the many situations in which it’s invaluable to have cultivated a mutually supportive relationship with your dean. If I had called out my colleague’s email myself, I might have sounded just as peevish as my antagonist. But if the dean calls it out, it’s clear that the issue isn’t merely a personal slight but uncollegial and unprofessional behavior that will not be tolerated. It’s a much cleaner solution all around.

In your situation, the cc-prone professors seem to be limiting the reach of their emails to the department. So I wouldn’t turn to the dean on this one (at least not yet, and only if things get ugly). Instead, you could speak — and I do mean in person, not via email — with one of your colleagues. Talk with a senior professor whom you trust and whom you know supports you. This person may even have commented on this behavior to you already. So ask this colleague to intervene, and reply all, the next time this happens. Something like: “I think you mistakenly cc’d us all on this one. The only person this needs to go to is the chair, right?” (No doubt other members of the department will appreciate having their inboxes a little less cluttered with irrelevant emails.)

Finally, once the current kerfuffle quiets down, I’d suggest that you think about adding some language regarding email etiquette to your departmental bylaws. In looking for some good models, crack researcher that I am, I Googled “email etiquette .edu” — and all of the top results are campus websites instructing students on proper email etiquette for communicating with their instructors.

ADVERTISEMENT

Professor, heal thyself! What are some appropriate guidelines for how faculty members should communicate with one another via email? I’ve essentially been describing a departmental rule here: Don’t use “cc:” as a device to harass or embarrass the recipient. (Put that way, it sounds so obvious!) Another possible guideline: Don’t forward an email to a third party without the original sender’s knowledge.

What guidelines do you, or does your department, follow to keep email communication healthy? I’d love to hear them.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Leadership & Governance Campus Culture
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Kevin Dettmar
Kevin Dettmar is W.M. Keck professor of English and director of the Humanities Studio at Pomona College. His forthcoming book is The Department Chair’s Companion: Practical Advice for Faculty Leaders, due out in fall of 2026 and a sequel to his 2022 book, How to Chair a Department. More information about his work with chairs and other faculty leaders is available at his website, kdettmar.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin