Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
Admissions

At Harvard Admissions Trial, a Dean Defends Decades of His Work

By Nell Gluckman October 16, 2018
Boston
William Fitzsimmons, who has led Harvard’s admissions program for more than 30 years, was questioned on Tuesday by lawyers in a case that is challenging the university’s race-conscious policy.
William Fitzsimmons, who has led Harvard’s admissions program for more than 30 years, was questioned on Tuesday by lawyers in a case that is challenging the university’s race-conscious policy.Jessica M. Wang, The Harvard Crimson

The man who has done as much as anyone in the country to shape the field of college admissions nowadays took the stand on Tuesday to defend that work in a federal courtroom.

William R. Fitzsimmons, Harvard University’s dean of admissions, testified for more than two hours about how Harvard considers race when evaluating applicants for undergraduate admission. The university has been accused of discriminating against Asian-American applicants in a trial that started on Monday and is expected to last three weeks.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

William Fitzsimmons, who has led Harvard’s admissions program for more than 30 years, was questioned on Tuesday by lawyers in a case that is challenging the university’s race-conscious policy.
William Fitzsimmons, who has led Harvard’s admissions program for more than 30 years, was questioned on Tuesday by lawyers in a case that is challenging the university’s race-conscious policy.Jessica M. Wang, The Harvard Crimson

The man who has done as much as anyone in the country to shape the field of college admissions nowadays took the stand on Tuesday to defend that work in a federal courtroom.

William R. Fitzsimmons, Harvard University’s dean of admissions, testified for more than two hours about how Harvard considers race when evaluating applicants for undergraduate admission. The university has been accused of discriminating against Asian-American applicants in a trial that started on Monday and is expected to last three weeks.

The case has drawn the public’s attention, both for its promise of forcing the revelation of details of Harvard’s once-secretive methods of evaluating high-school students and because it is seen as the beginning of another long fight over affirmative action that could be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

As the dean of admissions for 32 years, Fitzsimmons has been the main architect of Harvard’s admissions procedures. Much of the responsibility for defending that process on the national stage has fallen to him.

He answered questions in a mostly monotone voice, peering at John M. Hughes, a lawyer representing Students for Fair Admissions, the organization that sued Harvard in 2014, through a pair of wire-frame glasses. Hughes tried to extract precise answers to questions about admissions officials’ training materials, the different ratings applicants receive, and how race is treated in the process, but Fitzsimmons repeated over and over that the reality is more complicated than Hughes portrayed it.

Fitzsimmons tried to paint a picture of a complex process that is different for every student who applies to Harvard. Applicants’ race, he said, is never considered in isolation. But admissions officers do consider it an important part of students’ life experience. Harvard officials are impressed when applicants have overcome economic adversity or racial discrimination, he said. They believe those students have something to teach the rest of their potential classmates at Harvard.

A Report From 1990

Hughes tried to home in on data and specifics to make the case that, in that process, Asian-American applicants have been treated unfairly. He offered information about the numerical scores applicants receive in four categories: academic ability, athletic ability, extracurricular activity, and personality. Fitzsimmons insisted that while applicants receive numerical scores, the process is not formulaic. SAT scores, for example, are considered alongside students’ access to test-preparation classes and the support they might receive from their family.

“One test score is simply not equivalent to another standardized-test score,” he said.

Hughes showed passages from an instructional handbook for admissions officers, and asked Fitzsimmons to confirm that it included almost no mention of how to treat applicants’ race and ethnicity. Fitzsimmons responded that the handbook is a small part of how officers are trained, and that much information is passed “back and forth, from one admissions officer to another.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Hughes also showed passages from an economist’s analysis of Harvard admissions data that projected what the Class of 2019 would have looked like had race not been considered in admitting its members. Doesn’t the analysis show, he asked, that if race had not been considered, the share of Asian-American students in the class would have risen from 24 percent to 27 percent?

“Asian-Americans as a group,” Hughes continued, “do not benefit from Harvard’s use of race in terms of how many Asian-Americans are admitted in a given class, correct?”

Asian-American students benefit from the consideration of race because the quality of their education improves when a class is made more diverse, Fitzsimmons said. He added that “certainly there are some Asian-Americans who end up at Harvard themselves because their background was a factor in admissions in a positive way.”

Hughes showed passages from a 1990 report by the U.S. Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights. The report, which cleared Harvard of racial discimination, said that some readers of applications thought that race was a factor when applicants received numerical scores on their academic, athletic, extracurricular, and personal achievements.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Everyone is always vigilant to make sure race and ethnicity is used in the proper way,” Fitzsimmons said.

‘A Very, Very Different World’

When asked why Asian-American applicants receive lower scores in the personal category than white applicants do, Fitzsimmons offered an explanation: White applicants tend to receive better letters of recommendation from teachers and guidance counselors than do Asian-American applicants.

Hughes asked if admissions officials should have instructions for determining how much to weight an applicant’s ethnicity. Fitzsimmons said that there shouldn’t be a mechanical process because “each individual is unique.”

In the 1990 report the Office for Civil Rights also found that some admissions officials had described Asian-American applicants “as being quiet, shy, science/math-oriented, and hard workers.” Hughes asked Fitzsimmons if those stereotypical comments were “consistent with the way Harvard uses race in admissions.” Fitzsimmons responded that admissions officers “abhor stereotypical comments” and take the 1990 report very seriously.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fitzsimmons also cited his own experience as a Harvard student in the 1960s. He said that at that time there were almost no students of color on the campus.

“It was a very, very different world,” he said. “I learned much, much less about what was going on in the world than our students today.”

His testimony was interrupted in the middle of the morning by a fire alarm that sent everyone from the packed courtroom in Boston out onto the sidewalk for about an hour. On Wednesday Hughes will continue to question Fitzsimmons. Then a lawyer for Harvard will cross-examine him.

Nell Gluckman writes about faculty issues and other topics in higher education. You can follow her on Twitter @nellgluckman, or email her at nell.gluckman@chronicle.com.

Read other items in Harvard on Trial.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Admissions & Enrollment Race
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Gluckman_Nell.jpg
About the Author
Nell Gluckman
Nell Gluckman is a senior reporter who writes about research, ethics, funding issues, affirmative action, and other higher-education topics. You can follow her on Twitter @nellgluckman, or email her at nell.gluckman@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Harvard Admissions Trial Opens With Arguments Focused on Diversity
Harvard’s Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Goes on Trial on Monday. Here’s What to Expect.

More News

Collage of charts
Data
How Faculty Pay and Tenure Can Change Depending on Academic Discipline
Vector illustration of two researcher's hands putting dollar signs into a beaker leaking green liquid.
'Life Support'
As the Nation’s Research-Funding Model Ruptures, Private Money Becomes a Band-Aid
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through a flat black and white university building and a landscape bearing the image of a $100 bill.
Budget Troubles
‘Every Revenue Source Is at Risk’: Under Trump, Research Universities Are Cutting Back
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome topping a jar of money.
Budget Bill
Republicans’ Plan to Tax Higher Ed and Slash Funding Advances in Congress

From The Review

Photo-based illustration of the sculpture, The Thinker, interlaced with anotehr image of a robot posed as The Thinker with bits of binary code and red strips weaved in.
The Review | Essay
What I Learned Serving on My University’s AI Committee
By Megan Fritts
Illustration of a Gold Seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
What Trump’s Accreditation Moves Get Right
By Samuel Negus
Illustration of a torn cold seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
The Weaponization of Accreditation
By Greg D. Pillar, Laurie Shanderson

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin