Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Focus on Access

At the White House Summit, 3 Things That Worked—and 2 That Didn’t

By Max Lewontin December 5, 2014
Washington

With an increased focus on the barriers that keep many students from enrolling in or graduating from college, the second White House Summit on College Opportunity invited a broader range of college leaders, precollege educators, and organizations to the table.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

With an increased focus on the barriers that keep many students from enrolling in or graduating from college, the second White House Summit on College Opportunity invited a broader range of college leaders, precollege educators, and organizations to the table.

After the first such event, in January, the White House faced criticism from educators—particularly at community colleges and minority-serving institutions—who argued that the invitation-only summit had done little to address issues of college access for nontraditional, first-generation, and low-income students.

Thursday’s event was, in some ways, a response to those concerns. Did the White House succeed in making its second summit more diverse and distinct? The Chronicle asked three attendees what worked and what could be improved next time around.

What Worked

A broader range of institutions. One of the biggest criticisms of January’s gathering was the relatively elite group of institutions invited to the summit. “I think they really tried this time to be more inclusive, and it will be even bigger next year,” said Patricia McGuire, president of Trinity Washington University, which serves a large number of women of color and low-income students in Washington.

Ms. McGuire, who was among the critics of the guest list for the January event, said she appreciated the chance to converse with leaders of a wider range of institutions—both those that already serve a more-diverse group of students and those working toward that goal.

“It’s very clear that our national leaders have personal passion on these issues, it is good to see them up close and personal, and see the fire in their eyes about this,” she said.

“I felt like there was a pretty good cross section of institutions,” said Greg Johnson, chief executive of Bottom Line, a Boston-based foundation that works to improve college access for low-income students. “They got pretty much every sector.”

Clearer commitments from colleges. At the first summit, there was confusion over the commitments to increasing access that the White House asked institutions to make. “When people were sending in commitments in January, I’m not really sure if they knew what they were committing to and how they would get it done,” said Nancy L. Zimpher, chancellor of the State University of New York system.

This summit’s call for pledges to improve access was better defined and more productive, she said. “Let’s talk about what can you do, how do you know what you’re going to do will work, and, more importantly, how are you going to scale good ideas?”

Mr. Johnson said he was glad to see many institutions making strong, focused pledges at this summit. But he still hoped to hear more about how they would actually meet those goals.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sharper panels. A pair of panel discussions were generally helpful, attendees said, in providing case studies for how institutions can focus and refine their commitments.

A session on innovations provided “inside information” from online nonprofit groups and businesses, Ms. Zimpher said. And a panel on strengthening ties with precollege educators, in which she participated, was more direct, with input from local superintendents in Long Beach, Calif., and Dayton, Ohio.

At one point, Ms. Zimpher suggested a plan to make sure high-school students prepare financially for college: Tell them they can’t go to the prom if they haven’t filled out their federal student-aid application.

Mr. Johnson praised the innovation panel as particularly useful. “I keep coming back to the word ‘disruptive’—maybe I originally heard it at a TED conference or something,” he said. A disruptive innovation like introducing dedicated college counselors at local high schools, for instance, would help prepare students for the college-application process, he said, rather than a vague commitment to improve college access.

What Needs Improvement

Not enough talk about cost. A comment by Michelle Obama, Ms. McGuire said, was hotly debated by attendees. “We need to do as much as we can with the resources we have,” Ms. Obama said.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Ms. McGuire said institutions like Trinity, which serve a broad range of students with limited financial resources, needed a clearer picture of what financial support the Obama administration and the Education Department could provide.

“Many of us that are not elite institutions are stretching our resources and are being asked to do more and more and more without raising prices,” she said. Investing in new laboratories and technology, she added, is a particular hardship.

“Everybody understands the budget situation,” she said, “but it’s unrealistic to ask about doing more without talking about cost.”

Rhetoric or commitment? Is the summit a once-a-year event or part of a sustained commitment to helping a broader group of students? That concern remains.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I guess sometimes I’m frustrated with the slow pace” of change, Mr. Johnson said. “I think everybody is.”

Ms. Zimpher suggested a way of keeping attendees’ eyes on the ball: building more case studies into the next summit. “There could be an emphasis on how to use data to improve,” she said. “It’s one thing to collect data; it’s another to use it to improve.”

Ms. McGuire said she had hoped for more discussion between institutions and the various nonprofit and business-world officials than the brief breakout sessions offered.

“There’s so much knowledge that you don’t want to miss the opportunity to soak up all the wisdom in the room,” she said, suggesting that the summits could expand to include regional conferences with college administrators who are closer to the ground than are presidents and nonprofit leaders.

“I don’t think there’s a lack of partnership, but we left feeling hungry,” she said. “Maybe that’s a good thing.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Law & Policy Political Influence & Activism
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Illustration showing a letter from the South Carolina Secretary of State over a photo of the Bob Jones University campus.
Missing Files
Apparent Paperwork Error Threatens Bob Jones U.'s Legal Standing in South Carolina
Pro-Palestinian student protesters demonstrate outside Barnard College in New York on February 27, 2025, the morning after pro-Palestinian student protesters stormed a Barnard College building to protest the expulsion last month of two students who interrupted a university class on Israel. (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY / AFP) (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
A College Vows to Stop Engaging With Some Student Activists to Settle a Lawsuit Brought by Jewish Students
LeeNIHGhosting-0709
Stuck in limbo
The Scientists Who Got Ghosted by the NIH
Protesters attend a demonstration in support of Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, March 10, 2025, in New York.
First-Amendment Rights
Noncitizen Professors Testify About Chilling Effect of Others’ Detentions

From The Review

Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky
Photo-based illustration depicting a close-up image of a mouth of a young woman with the letter A over the lips and grades in the background
The Review | Opinion
When Students Want You to Change Their Grades
By James K. Beggan

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin