Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
News

At This Texas Campus, Sexual Harassers Can Now Expect to Be Fired

By Katherine Mangan March 2, 2020
The U. of Texas at Austin announced major changes on Monday in its policy on sexual misconduct.
The U. of Texas at Austin announced major changes on Monday in its policy on sexual misconduct.Alamy

Firing will be the “presumptive punishment” for faculty and staff members at the University of Texas at Austin who commit sexual assault, sexual harassment, stalking, or interpersonal violence, the university’s president, Gregory L. Fenves, announced on Monday.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Firing will be the “presumptive punishment” for faculty and staff members at the University of Texas at Austin who commit sexual assault, sexual harassment, stalking, or interpersonal violence, the university’s president, Gregory L. Fenves, announced on Monday.

In addition, information will be made publicly available about those who are found to have committed such acts but whose jobs are spared because of mitigating circumstances, the president said.

Termination may be the practice for more and more schools, but putting it in writing as policy is an uncommon step.

Pressure has been building on colleges to toughen their responses to sexual harassment, but it’s unusual for a campus to spell out firing as the expected response.

“Termination may be the practice for more and more schools, but putting it in writing as policy is an uncommon step, so far,” Brett A. Sokolow, president of the Association of Title IX Administrators, wrote in an email. He said this is the first such policy he’s aware of.

At UT-Austin, decisive punishment and transparency have been key demands of students who have for months been complaining about professors who return to the classroom after being found responsible for violating the university’s sexual-misconduct policies. Among them was Coleman Hutchison, a tenured associate professor of English who was punished for not reporting a relationship with a former graduate student and for making inappropriate comments to other graduate students.

Fenves said he had accepted all of the recommendations submitted by Husch Blackwell, an outside law firm that conducted a four-month review of the university’s policies related to sexual misconduct. The changes, the president said, “are designed to better support survivors, provide clear disciplinary guidelines, and improve communication with the campus community.”

Among the key changes:

Termination as the presumptive punishment: Employees who engage in any of the four categories of misconduct outlined in the report will have to make a convincing case why they shouldn’t be fired. This a big win for activists who have argued that suspensions and other interim punishments allow harassers to return to the campus to victimize more students. Fenves said misconduct findings would come only after a thorough investigation.

Sexual assault, sexual harassment, stalking, and interpersonal violence are the four categories of misconduct outlined in a 2019 state law that requires universities to report such violations. Fenves said that the policy change would make clear that sexual misconduct wouldn’t be tolerated and that if it happened, “the consequences will be clear.”

Sokolow wrote that the policy could backfire by chilling reporting “by victims/survivors who are not looking to have someone terminated or expelled.” That possibility could be mitigated, he said, if the process takes into consideration what the victim considers an appropriate consequence.

Some faculty members are already on edge about the possibility that, with Texas’ new mandatory reporting law, they could face criminal charges for failing to report harassment.

Making information public when offenders remain employed: The university agreed to compile and make information about offenses public as long as the privacy of survivors is protected. At times in the past, the university has balked at releasing information about sexual misconduct, saying that doing so could violate the rights of complainants who don’t want to go public. It remains to be seen how the university will meet its latest commitment to transparency when complainants want their identities protected and worry that too many details will expose them to public scrutiny.

ADVERTISEMENT

The law firm recommended that the university publicly disclose the name of the employee in question, a brief description of the incident, and an explanation of why the person wasn’t fired.

It noted that none of the peer universities it studied had such a policy in place. “However, we believe there are unique legal issues in Texas, including the mandatory reporting law and Texas’ robust public-information law, that warrant a unique approach.”

In the past, it’s generally taken public-records requests to bring that kind of information to light. In January, following such requests, the university disclosed that 17 employees of the flagship campus had violated its sexual-misconduct policies from November 2017 to December 2019.

Streamlining the resources available to complainants: During an emotional public forum in January, students complained that the university was doing too little to protect them from “sexual predators” and that the services available to survivors were insufficient.

ADVERTISEMENT

The review found that the university offered a robust assortment of programs for survivors, but that they were confusing, not clearly communicated, and possibly underused.

Fenves said some survivors had expressed interest in alternative forms of dispute resolution and other ways to help in the healing process. The university will consult with experts, including at the school of social work, to introduce restorative justice, an umbrella term that covers a variety of cooperative interventions aimed more at healing than punishing.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Update (March 3, 2020, 2:26 p.m.): Clarification: An earlier version of this article may have implied that Coleman Hutchison was found responsible for harassment or assault. The finding was that he had violated the university’s sexual-misconduct policy by failing to report a relationship and making inappropriate comments.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
mangan-katie.jpg
About the Author
Katherine Mangan
Katherine Mangan writes about community colleges, completion efforts, student success, and job training, as well as free speech and other topics in daily news. Follow her @KatherineMangan, or email her at katherine.mangan@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Joan Wong for The Chronicle
Productivity Measures
A 4/4 Teaching Load Becomes Law at Most of Wisconsin’s Public Universities
Illustration showing a letter from the South Carolina Secretary of State over a photo of the Bob Jones University campus.
Missing Files
Apparent Paperwork Error Threatens Bob Jones U.'s Legal Standing in South Carolina
Pro-Palestinian student protesters demonstrate outside Barnard College in New York on February 27, 2025, the morning after pro-Palestinian student protesters stormed a Barnard College building to protest the expulsion last month of two students who interrupted a university class on Israel. (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY / AFP) (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
A College Vows to Stop Engaging With Some Student Activists to Settle a Lawsuit Brought by Jewish Students
LeeNIHGhosting-0709
Stuck in limbo
The Scientists Who Got Ghosted by the NIH

From The Review

Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky
Photo-based illustration depicting a close-up image of a mouth of a young woman with the letter A over the lips and grades in the background
The Review | Opinion
When Students Want You to Change Their Grades
By James K. Beggan

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin