Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
Graduate Education

At U. of Missouri, Grad Students Rally for Better Conditions, and Faculty Come to Their Aid

By Vimal Patel August 27, 2015
Graduate students rallied at the U. of Missouri at Columbia on Wednesday. An uproar over their pay and work conditions erupted last week after the university abruptly cut, then temporarily reinstated, their health-insurance benefits. But that was only “the straw that broke the camel’s back,” one faculty supporter said.
Graduate students rallied at the U. of Missouri at Columbia on Wednesday. An uproar over their pay and work conditions erupted last week after the university abruptly cut, then temporarily reinstated, their health-insurance benefits. But that was only “the straw that broke the camel’s back,” one faculty supporter said.John Happel, The Missourian

At the University of Missouri at Columbia, long simmering concerns over poor working conditions for graduate students have boiled over.

On Wednesday, several hundred graduate students, faculty members, and other protesters marched on the campus to push the administration to raise stipend levels, offer better housing and child-care options, and make other improvements. Rallying under the iconic columns at the university’s Traditions Plaza, the crowd chanted “M-I-Z, shame on you,” with many wearing red T-shirts with slogans that supported the graduate students’ cause.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

At the University of Missouri at Columbia, long simmering concerns over poor working conditions for graduate students have boiled over.

On Wednesday, several hundred graduate students, faculty members, and other protesters marched on the campus to push the administration to raise stipend levels, offer better housing and child-care options, and make other improvements. Rallying under the iconic columns at the university’s Traditions Plaza, the crowd chanted “M-I-Z, shame on you,” with many wearing red T-shirts with slogans that supported the graduate students’ cause.

The uproar began earlier this month after university officials told students that because of changes in federal policy they would no longer receive health-insurance subsidies, a message sent out only hours before the benefits were set to expire.

R. Bowen Loftin, the university’s chancellor, last week apologized for the “lack of appropriate notice and prior consultation” and created a task force to propose ways to deal with the health-care issue. He also said the university would hold off on dropping the subsidies, so that students enrolled in the 2015-16 academic year could continue to have their insurance covered by the university.

Despite those steps, the students have continued to press their case, saying that health care was only one of several issues that they want the university to address.

While graduate-student protests aren’t rare, the Missouri one is unusual in part because of the high level of faculty support. About half of the university’s departments wrote letters in support of the students. Many department heads and faculty advisers reassured graduate students they would not be penalized if they walked out of classes they were scheduled to teach in order to participate in Wednesday’s events. Some faculty members even taught their undergraduates about the plight of the low-paid graduate assistants or canceled classes altogether.

“We as a department have for too long sat idly by as key support for graduate students has eroded, from the lack of a student parent center and housing options to stagnant salaries, increasing fees, slashing of tuition waivers, and now a last-minute reneging on health insurance benefits,” said one letter signed as “the Anthropology Faculty.”

One of the most outspoken faculty members is Lois Huneycutt, an associate professor and director of graduate studies in the history department, who spoke at Wednesday’s protest. In an interview with The Chronicle, she discussed why faculty members are so supportive of the graduate students’ cause and why events at Missouri may have implications for other universities. The following conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

Q. Why have faculty been so supportive of the graduate students these last two weeks?

A. It’s the most unanimous I’ve seen this faculty in the 20 years I’ve been here, I think all of us recognize that graduate students have been exploited for some time, and feel guilty about it. Most people have jumped for this chance to actually do something.

Q. Why should Missouri faculty feel guilty?

A. These students have over the last five years had an erosion in their already precarious position. Our faculty recognizes this and yet we’re asking them to take on more and more of the load of undergraduate teaching.

ADVERTISEMENT

Q. What advice would you have for faculty at other institutions?

A. If you have tenure and you’re not using it, it’s going to waste. They have a responsibility, particularly if they’re out there recruiting graduate students, to really understand the conditions that their graduate students are living in. They also need to be honest with them about their workload and chances of employment at the end of their degree. I’m still amazed to talk to students in the last stages of deciding where to attend graduate school and still not having had anyone at their home institution tell them about their employment outlook, particularly in the humanities and social sciences.

Q. What implications do you see beyond Missouri?

A. Obviously, the fact that graduate students are overworked and underpaid is not unique to us. Our students have reached out to students from other universities that are unionized. I just don’t believe this model of paying them so little can continue. Something’s got to give. I think we’re at a tipping point.

Q. How did Missouri get to this point?

A. I don’t think we have administrators who are malicious, but I also don’t think that graduate education has been a budget priority for a long time. In a situation where everybody is scrambling for every available dollar, graduate students don’t have much of a voice. They really don’t have anyone in administration whose job it is to advocate for graduate-student interests.

ADVERTISEMENT

Q. Do you put any of the blame on the state legislature?

A. I blame both the university and legislators. We have allowed our infrastructure to crumble. Our graduate-student housing was declared unsafe after a firefighter was killed in a collapse. [The firefighter was evacuating students from the building, where a second-story walkway had collapsed.] It was torn down and not replaced. Our child-care center was condemned. Our library is in really sad shape. The health-care issue was just the straw that broke the camel’s back.

Vimal Patel covers graduate education. Follow him on Twitter @vimalpatel232, or write to him at vimal.patel@chronicle.com.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Graduate Education
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Patel_Vimal.jpg
About the Author
Vimal Patel
Vimal Patel, a reporter at The New York Times, previously covered student life, social mobility, and other topics for The Chronicle of Higher Education.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo-based illustration of a mirror on a green, patterned wallpaper wall reflecting Campanile in Berkeley, California.
A Look in the Mirror
At UC Berkeley, the Faculty Asks Itself, Do Our Critics Have a Point?
illustration of an arrow in a bullseye, surrounded by college buildings
Accreditation
A Major College Accreditor Pauses Its DEI Requirements Amid Pressure From Trump
Photo-based illustration of the Rotunda at the University of Virginia obscured by red and white horizontal stripes
'Demanding Obedience'
How Alums Put DEI at UVa in the Justice Dept.’s Crosshairs
Colin Holbrook
Q&A
‘I Didn’t Want to Make a Scene’: A Professor Recounts the Conversation That Got Him Ejected From Commencement

From The Review

American artist Andy Warhol, posing in front of The Last Supper, a personal interpretation the American artist gave of Leonardo da Vinci's Il Cenacolo, realized 1986, belonging to a series dedicated to Leonardo's masterpiece set up in palazzo delle Stelline; the work holds the spirit of Warhol's artistic Weltanschauung, demystifying the artwork in order to deprive it of its uniqueness and no repeatibility. Milan (Italy), 1987.
The Review | Essay
Were the 1980s a Golden Age of Religious Art?
By Phil Christman
Glenn Loury in Providence, R.I. on May 7, 2024.
The Review | Conversation
Glenn Loury on the ‘Barbarians at the Gates’
By Evan Goldstein, Len Gutkin
Illustration showing a valedictorian speaker who's tassel is a vintage microphone
The Review | Opinion
A Graduation Speaker Gets Canceled
By Corey Robin

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin