Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
A Blow to Faculty Rights

Ban on Tenure for New Faculty Hires Passes Texas Senate

By Sarah Brown April 20, 2023
Lieutenant Governor of Texas Dan Patrick speaks during the Conservative Political Action Conference CPAC held at the Hilton Anatole on July 09, 2021 in Dallas, Texas.
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick of TexasBrandon Bell, Getty Images

Lawmakers’ campaign to reshape public higher education in Texas advanced on Thursday, with the state Senate voting to approve a ban on tenure for new faculty hires.

Under Senate Bill 18, public colleges “may not grant an employee of the institution tenure or any type of permanent employment status.”

The legislation would apply only to faculty members hired by Texas colleges after January 1, 2024. Professors who have tenure, have applied for tenure, or are on the tenure track would not be affected

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Lawmakers’ campaign to reshape public higher education in Texas advanced on Thursday, with the state Senate voting to approve a ban on tenure for new faculty hires.

Under Senate Bill 18, public colleges “may not grant an employee of the institution tenure or any type of permanent employment status.”

The legislation would apply only to faculty members hired by Texas colleges after January 1, 2024. Professors who have tenure would not be affected.

The bill was initially slated to take effect in September 2023, but the Senate passed an amendment on Thursday that altered the date — allowing people who are on track to get tenure this year to move forward, according to lawmakers. It’s not clear what the measure, if enacted, would mean for other tenure-track faculty members.

Public-college boards would be able to create “an alternate system of tiered employment status for faculty members” that’s not tenure, the legislation states. But that system would require faculty members to go through an annual performance evaluation.

The bill will have to be approved by a Texas House committee, the full House, and the governor before it can become law. The legislative session ends on May 29, and the measure’s prospects in the House remain unclear. Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, has not taken a position on the bill, saying “it will have to be looked at.”

Tenure has been a political punching bag for years — a venue for lawmakers to level criticisms at higher ed and its alleged liberal indoctrination. Some politicians, mostly Republicans, have decried the idea of a system that, as they see it, gives poorly performing professors lifetime job security. Bills have been proposed and typically died in committee. Limits on tenure have generally come from college and university governing boards.

This time is different: A tenure ban has passed a legislative chamber.

Such a ban in Texas has been a top priority this year for Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, whose position also makes him president of the state Senate. “Tenured professors must not be able to hide behind the phrase ‘academic freedom,’ and then proceed to poison the minds of our next generation,” Patrick, a Republican, said in a February statement. He also said at the time he would push for a requirement that professors who retain tenure get an annual performance review.

ADVERTISEMENT

Faculty members and others have expressed alarm at the possibility of banning tenure, saying it would harm the state’s recruitment of top scholars and spark fear among professors that they could be fired for teaching or researching controversial subjects.

Brandon Creighton, a Texas state senator and author of the bill, said during floor debate on Thursday that he didn’t think a tenure ban would put Texas colleges at a competitive disadvantage, as long as the alternate employment model that colleges design is attractive.

The Texas Senate acted on another higher-ed matter this week: On Wednesday lawmakers passed a ban on campus diversity offices. Senate Bill 17 would also bar mandatory diversity training and the use of diversity statements in hiring.

Texas’ tenure bill has moved forward while a tenure-reform bill in North Dakota recently fell short. Legislation there would have created a program at two public colleges to reshape post-tenure reviews, putting the process in the hands of college presidents. One president who supported the bill said it would have allowed him to hold unproductive faculty members accountable. The bill passed the North Dakota House, but narrowly failed in the state Senate last month.

ADVERTISEMENT

In Florida a sweeping higher-ed reform bill initially took aim at tenure, proposing to give public colleges the power to review any tenured faculty member at any time for cause. Those provisions were removed last week from the Senate version of the bill.

Iowa lawmakers also proposed banning tenure several months ago, but the bill stalled after college officials and business leaders expressed concerns.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Law & Policy Academic Freedom
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
SarahBrown2024
About the Author
Sarah Brown
Sarah Brown is The Chronicle’s news editor. Follow her on Twitter @Brown_e_Points, or email her at sarah.brown@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin