Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Proprietary Sector

Biden Has Promised to Crack Down on Troubled For-Profit Colleges. Some Are Already in Peril.

By Eric Kelderman April 2, 2021
Carl Barney
Carl Barney, the longtime owner and operator of many for-profit colleges and universities across the country.Courtesy of Carl Barney

By nearly every measure, the chain of colleges operated by the nonprofit Center for Excellence in Higher Education has big problems.

The colleges, previously part of the for-profit-college empire of Carl Barney, have all been put on probation by their accreditor since 2018 because of low graduation and job-placement rates and of questions about the accuracy of information provided to the accreditor. All but two of the chain’s 15 locations are in the process of shutting down.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

By nearly every measure, the chain of colleges operated by the nonprofit Center for Excellence in Higher Education has big problems.

The colleges, previously part of the for-profit-college empire of Carl Barney, have all been put on probation by their accreditor since 2018 because of low graduation and job-placement rates and of questions about the accuracy of information provided to the accreditor. All but two of the chain’s 15 locations are in the process of shutting down.

The center and its colleges are under investigation by the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which has also filed a lawsuit in the matter, to compel the center to provide testimony concerning the organization’s private student loan program. Last year a Colorado court found the center and its leadership guilty of consumer fraud and fined it $3 million.

Despite all that, the colleges remain eligible to receive tens of millions of dollars in federal student aid under a temporary agreement with the U.S. Department of Education. But the deal could come to an end, experts say, under a presidential administration bent on bringing more scrutiny to proprietary colleges. And without the flow of federal dollars, the colleges could be forced to close.

The center’s colleges are among more than 130 institutions, nearly all for-profits, that operate under a provisional, or month-to-month, agreement with the department because of questionable operations or a proposed change of ownership, according to a recent report by the Century Foundation. The arrangements give the department wide-ranging authority to kick colleges out of the federal student-aid program, said Yan Cao, a senior fellow at the foundation and one of the report’s authors.

President Biden has said his administration will seek to “stop for-profit education programs from profiteering off of students,” and his appointees are poised to renew several regulations that would hold those institutions accountable for their graduates’ earnings and would limit access to federal dollars for colleges that violate those rules.

While those regulatory efforts will take years to carry out, Education Department officials could terminate provisional agreements much more quickly.

They’re “low-hanging fruit,” said Amy Laitinen, director of higher education at New America, a left-leaning think tank. “I would be surprised if they weren’t considering things like this.”

Likely Targets

Eric S. Juhlin, chief executive of the Center for Excellence in Higher Education, plays down its challenges. He said its colleges are “on solid financial footing,” with strong enrollments of around 10,000 students in total, and he called probation “a tool of the accreditor,” not a negative action. The center is also appealing the fraud conviction, which he called “a completely wrong decision.”

ADVERTISEMENT

But Juhlin said he is concerned about the department’s regulatory agenda. “It’s already clear that this department is looking to reverse or rescind some actions from the previous administration,” he said.

Many new appointees to the Education Department served under President Barack Obama, when the agency rolled out several new regulations meant to hold proprietary colleges accountable. Those measures included the so-called gainful-employment rule, which compared the earnings of career-college graduates to their student-loan debt, to see if they were being saddled with unpayable debt, and created a way for borrowers to recoup their student loans if their college closed suddenly or defrauded them.

The former Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, who served under Biden’s predecessor, undid those rules, which a judge had already partly struck down, and worked to shield proprietary colleges as part of a broad agenda to deregulate higher education.

Under DeVos, the department also gave Barney, the for-profit mogul, permission to convert his colleges into nonprofit institutions, a step that would allow them to receive more than 90 percent of their revenues from Pell Grants, for low-income students, and federal student loans.

ADVERTISEMENT

Now, under the new education secretary, Miguel A. Cardona, the department has said it will seek to renew the Obama-era regulations, but the process to do so is lengthy and will almost certainly face political pushback and legal challenges. Even if the regulations take effect, it will be several more years before any institutions face consequences.

That’s why the colleges operating under provisional agreements are likely targets.

Once colleges are placed on provisional status to receive federal student aid, the department can immediately revoke their access to it, said Dan Zibel, vice president and chief counsel for the National Student Legal Defense Fund. Such a revocation remains in place even as a college appeals the decision to the department and in the courts, said Zibel, a former lawyer at the agency.

For the department, revocation is a much more efficient way to enforce accountability on colleges with poor student outcomes, shaky finances, or federal-rules violations. And it’s a tactic used often under Obama.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the final three years of the Obama administration, the department reported that it had cut off federal aid to some 30 colleges that had been operating under temporary arrangements — essentially, a death knell for dozens of campuses that could not stay in business without the flow of federal dollars.

Helping Students

The list of colleges now under temporary agreements with the department includes some of the largest institutions in the for-profit sector. Among them is Walden University, currently under investigation by the Department of Justice over whether it deceived nursing students about the availability of clinical placements and other issues. Its owner, Laureate Education, is seeking to sell Walden to Adtalem Global. Two of Adtalem’s investors, who say the decision to purchase Walden has “destroyed value for stockholders,” are urging the company to wait on completing the sale until the results of the federal probe are known. A spokesman for Laureate said the company was “optimistic” that the sale would be completed in the second half of the year.

Another prominent for-profit, American Intercontinental University, owned by the Perdoceo Corporation, was on a provisional agreement that expired at the end of March. In 2019 the company, formerly called the Career Education Corporation, settled an investigation by all 50 state attorneys general by paying more than half a billion dollars for using inflated job-placement rates to recruit students.

Perdoceo has closed or consolidated several campuses, and even deferred taking federal dollars, to comply with federal rules that limit the percentage of federal aid that proprietary colleges may receive, according to an analysis by BMO Capital Markets.

ADVERTISEMENT

The company did not respond to a request for comment.

Advocates for the proprietary-college industry say the Education Department has a responsibility to oversee the federal student-aid programs, but shouldn’t simply target the for-profit sector.

“It would be inappropriate for the department to politicize the eligibility and certification process simply based on an institution’s tax status,” said Nicholas Kent, senior vice president for policy and regulatory affairs at Career Education Colleges and Universities, an association that represents mostly proprietary colleges.

For Cao, of the Century Foundation, the bottom line is that colleges are not automatically entitled to federal student-aid funds and the department has a duty to protect the people who actually receive the money.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The idea of Title IV,” she said, “was that the funds would only be available to schools to help students.”

Dan Bauman contributed to this article.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Correction (April 3, 2021, 3:13 p.m.): This article originally stated that investors in Adtalem Global Education were suing to stop the company from purchasing Walden University from Laureate Education. In fact, two of Adtalem's investors have asked the company to delay the sale until a federal investigation of Walden is complete. The article has been updated to reflect this correction.
Tags
Law & Policy Political Influence & Activism
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Eric Kelderman
About the Author
Eric Kelderman
Eric Kelderman covers issues of power, politics, and purse strings in higher education. You can email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com, or find him on Twitter @etkeld.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin