Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
Law & Policy

Biden’s Title IX Rule Is Now Blocked Nationwide. Here’s What That Means.

By Kate Hidalgo Bellows January 9, 2025
President Joe Biden speaks in the Roosevelt Room of the White House, Friday, June 30, 2023, in Washington. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona listens at left.
President Joe Biden speaks in the Roosevelt Room of the White House, with Education Secretary Miguel A. Cardona.Evan Vucci, AP

What’s New

A federal judge in Kentucky struck down the Biden administration’s Title IX rule on Thursday, writing that the regulations exceeded the Education Department’s authority and violated the Constitution.

The decision came in response to a lawsuit filed last year by six Republican-led states, which primarily took issue with the Biden rule’s protections for transgender students. Federal-court injunctions last year blocked the rule from being enforced on August 1 in those states and 20 others that sued, leaving in place the Trump administration’s 2020 regulations. The Thursday decision bars the rule from being enforced nationwide.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

What’s New

A federal judge in Kentucky struck down the Biden administration’s Title IX rule on Thursday, writing that the regulations exceeded the Education Department’s authority and violated the Constitution.

The decision came in response to a lawsuit filed last year by six Republican-led states, which primarily took issue with the Biden rule’s protections for transgender students. Federal-court injunctions last year blocked the rule from being enforced on August 1 in those states and 20 others that sued, leaving in place the Trump administration’s 2020 regulations. The Thursday decision bars the rule from being enforced nationwide.

The Details

In his decision, Chief Judge Danny C. Reeves of the Eastern District of Kentucky emphasized that Title IX is limited by its language to protections against discrimination on the basis of sex, and by interpreting that to include gender identity, the Education Department overstepped its authority.

Biden’s rule, which was released in April, broadened protections for LGBTQ students, including guaranteeing them access to facilities that aligned with their gender identities. To do so, the Education Department leaned on the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, which said that Title VII protects LGBTQ employees against discrimination. Reeves took issue with the department’s reliance on Bostock, given “striking differences” between the two civil-rights laws and the fact that the Supreme Court’s majority opinion in the case specified that its decision did not address bathrooms or locker rooms.

Biden’s Title IX rule also added safeguards for pregnant and parenting students; removed live-hearing and cross-examination requirements for sexual-misconduct investigations; and broadened the definition of sexual harassment. Those measures, too, are vacated by Thursday’s ruling.

The Backdrop

The incoming Trump administration was widely expected to undo Biden’s protections for transgender students and furthermore ban them from playing on sports teams that didn’t match their biological sex at birth. The Biden administration proposed, but never finalized, regulations on transgender athletes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Thursday’s decision means the Trump administration will have less work to do. The first Trump administration did not effect its own regulations pertaining to transgender students, but did remove Obama-era Title IX guidance that said colleges should allow students to use facilities that aligned with their gender identity.

Republicans have vowed to bar transgender women from participating in women’s sports. In a statement, Rep. Tim Walberg, chair of the U.S. House Education and Workforce Committee, celebrated the court’s decision. “From its first day in office, the Biden-Harris administration tried to unilaterally rewrite the legal definition of womanhood to include biological males,” he wrote. “I am proud to support Title IX and the women who fought to defend it — today marks an enormous win for women and girls across America.”

What’s Next

Title IX experts said the Biden administration could still choose to appeal the court’s ruling, but would be running up against the tight deadline of Inauguration Day (January 20) and would face a Sixth Circuit that affirmed blocking the rule in the original six states.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Unless the U.S. Department of Education steps in and does something more broadly, I don’t think we’re going to have any answers until we get to the Supreme Court,” said Melissa Carleton, higher-education chair at the law firm Bricker Graydon.

As for their policies, most colleges won’t have to lift a finger, since they never implemented the Biden rule. The Biden administration was additionally limited from enforcing its rule at hundreds of institutions that enrolled people affiliated with conservative groups that joined state lawsuits.

“Many schools are basically going to take their draft 2024 policy and shove it down further in their cabinet,” said Andrea Stagg, director of consulting services at Grand River Solutions. “I don’t know if they’ll delete it all together yet but they don’t need to brush off dust.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Law & Policy
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Kate Hidalgo Bellows, staff writer for the Chronicle of Higher Education.
About the Author
Kate Hidalgo Bellows
Kate Hidalgo Bellows is a staff reporter at The Chronicle. Follow her on Twitter @katebellows, or email her at kate.hidalgobellows@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Hoover-NBERValue-0516 002 B
Diminishing Returns
Why the College Premium Is Shrinking for Low-Income Students
Harvard University
'Deeply Unsettling'
Harvard’s Battle With Trump Escalates as Research Money Is Suddenly Canceled
Photo-based illustration of a hand and a magnifying glass focusing on a scene from Western Carolina Universiy
Equal Opportunity
The Trump Administration Widens Its Scrutiny of Colleges, With Help From the Internet
Santa J. Ono, president of the University of Michigan, watches a basketball game on the campus in November 2022.
'He Is a Chameleon'
At U. of Michigan, Frustrations Grew Over a President Who Couldn’t Be Pinned Down

From The Review

Illustration showing a valedictorian speaker who's tassel is a vintage microphone
The Review | Opinion
A Graduation Speaker Gets Canceled
By Corey Robin
Illustration showing a stack of coins and a university building falling over
The Review | Opinion
Here’s What Congress’s Endowment-Tax Plan Might Cost Your College
By Phillip Levine
Photo-based illustration of a college building under an upside down baby crib
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Must Stop Infantilizing Everyone
By Gregory Conti

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin