Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
News

Big Ten Conference’s TV Network Starts to Pay Off

By Libby Sander August 31, 2009

Two years after the Big Ten Conference dived into the high-stakes cable-television business, its 11 member institutions are seeing their venture begin to pay off.

The Big Ten Network posted its first profitable quarter last year, and the trend has continued into 2009. Market analysts expect the network to turn a $57-million profit this year—giving member universities some $29-million in addition to what their other TV contracts earn.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Two years after the Big Ten Conference dived into the high-stakes cable-television business, its 11 member institutions are seeing their venture begin to pay off.

The Big Ten Network posted its first profitable quarter last year, and the trend has continued into 2009. Market analysts expect the network to turn a $57-million profit this year—giving member universities some $29-million in addition to what their other TV contracts earn.

After a year spent hammering out distribution deals with cable operators—some of them contentious and very public—the network now has agreements in 22 of the top 25 television markets. While it still faces challenges, its programming is available to 73 million homes nationwide, and it will soon begin streaming live football and men’s basketball games online for fans abroad.

“It’s been everything we hoped it would be, but also more difficult,” says James E. Delany, commissioner of the Big Ten Conference, who sold the idea of a conference-owned television network to the Big Ten presidents. “Our schools believed in what we were doing, and they stayed the course.”

The Big Ten Network isn’t the first devoted exclusively to college sports. Before it came along, there was College Sports Television (now the CBS College Sports Network) and ESPNU. The Mountain West Conference also created its own channel.

Under the 20-year partnership between the Big Ten, which owns 51 percent of the venture, and Fox Cable Networks, each member institution takes home a share of the profits, which are expected to increase each year. In addition, nearly 700 hours of airtime every year are reserved for university programming, much of it unrelated to sports. (That is, if programs like “Mr. Lincoln’s University” and “The Science of Fermentation,” both airing at 4 a.m. on recent mornings, are your kind of thing.)

The early profit, and the promise of more to come, has Big Ten officials feeling optimistic. “It’s been a success financially,” says Graham Spanier, president of Pennsylvania State University, who has a sports-talk show on the channel. “We are all receiving the promised revenues, so there’s a boost for our universities and our athletic conference.”

Comparing the Deals

By establishing the network, the Big Ten took a different route from that of the Southeastern Conference, which this month begins the first year of a 15-year, $3-billion agreement with CBS and ESPN to televise its sporting events. The Big Ten also has a contract with ABC and ESPN, worth $1-billion over 10 years, and a $20-million agreement with CBS to broadcast marquee basketball games.

But the Big Ten channel, unlike ESPN and the other major networks, is harder to find. Outside the primarily Midwestern states in which the Big Ten universities are located, it is available only on a digital sports tier, which some cable customers must pay extra for.

Mr. Delany and Mr. Spanier are somewhat reluctant to compare their approach with the SEC’s. “It’s not a contest,” says Mr. Spanier. “We have our contract with ESPN, which I think is somewhat comparable to the SEC’s contract, but then we’ve got the whole Big Ten Network, which is very different. Ours is all day, every day. The SEC’s is just a fixed number of events that are covered.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. Delany is more blunt. “We have the deal that makes sense to us,” says the commissioner, who took home a $1.5-million bonus, in part for helping to create the network. “This is like the difference between renting a house and owning a house. You have equity.”

Running the Show

The network gives sports other than football and men’s and women’s basketball time in the spotlight, too. In all, more than 350 events, including lower-profile football games and swim meets, are televised. Two hundred more events in men’s and women’s Olympic sports are streamed live on the network’s Web site, http://www.bigtennetwork.com.

Karen Weaver, a former head field-hockey coach at Ohio State University who is now athletic director at Pennsylvania State University-the Abington College, provides color commentary for field-hockey games televised on the channel.

When she arrived for her first assignment, two years ago, at Michigan State University, the scene was unlike any pregame bustle she had known as a coach. Cameramen raced around the field. A tractor-trailer emblazoned with the Big Ten Network logo was parked in the end zone with a satellite dish. A producer and director had been on site since 4 a.m. (The game would start at noon.)

ADVERTISEMENT

“I’m sitting here going, ‘What is this? This is field hockey!’” she recalls.

By 2010, the Big Ten Network will devote 50 percent of its programming to women’s sports. “Most people would say that’s a money loser,” says Ms. Weaver, who recently completed a dissertation on the creation of the Big Ten Network. “But it’s part of the commitment.”

And that, says Mr. Delany, is the benefit of running the show.

“You can do things for your institution, for your athletic departments, for your student-athletes,” he says, “and you can do it in a way that’s best for them.”

Major Conferences’ TV Deals

The Southeastern Conference’s $3-billion CBS and ESPN television agreements are the richest in college sports. Here are the TV deals for the other five major conferences.

ADVERTISEMENT

Southeastern Conference
— ESPN: 15 years, $2.25-billion
— CBS: 15 years, $825-million
(Both contracts run through the 2023-24 season)

Big Ten Conference
— Big Ten Network: 20 years, $2.8-billion* through 2026-27
— ABC/ESPN: 10 years, $1-billion through 2016
— CBS: 10 years, $20-million for basketball through 2018-19

Atlantic Coast Conference
— ABC/ESPN: Seven years, $258-million
— Raycom Sports: 10 years, $300-million for basketball
(Both deals run through 2010-11)

Big 12 Conference
— ABC/ESPN: Eight years, $480-million through 2015-16
— Fox Sports Net: Four years, $78-million through 2011-12

ADVERTISEMENT

Pacific 10 Conference
— ABC/ESPN: Five years, $125-million for football
— Fox Sports Net: Five years, $97-million for football
— ABC/ESPN: Six years, $52.5-million for basketball
(All deals run through 2011-12)

Big East Conference
— ABC/ESPN: Six years, $200-million through 2013 *projected revenue

SOURCE: Sports Business Journal

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Athletics
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Libby Sander
Libby Sander was a senior reporter at The Chronicle, and wrote about student affairs, exploring the experiences of collegians from all walks of life.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

The Rise of the SEC
SEC Coaches Score in Down Economy
Missing Out on the Money, but Not Missing the League
Q&A: How the SEC’s Premier Athletics Program Balances Sports and Academics

More News

Mangan-Censorship-0610.jpg
Academic Freedom
‘A Banner Year for Censorship’: More States Are Restricting Classroom Discussions on Race and Gender
On the day of his retirement party, Bob Morse poses for a portrait in the Washington, D.C., offices of U.S. News and World Report in June 2025. Morse led the magazine's influential and controversial college rankings efforts since its inception in 1988. Michael Theis, The Chronicle.
List Legacy
‘U.S. News’ Rankings Guru, Soon to Retire, Reflects on the Role He’s Played in Higher Ed
Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits
Photo illustration showing a figurine of a football player with a large price tag on it.
Athletics
Loans, Fees, and TV Money: Where Colleges Are Finding the Funds to Pay Athletes

From The Review

A stack of coins falling over. Motion blur. Falling economy concept. Isolated on white.
The Review | Opinion
Will We Get a More Moderate Endowment Tax?
By Phillip Levine
Photo illustration of a classical column built of paper, with colored wires overtaking it like vines of ivy
The Review | Essay
The Latest Awful EdTech Buzzword: “Learnings”
By Kit Nicholls
William F. Buckley, Jr.
The Review | Interview
William F. Buckley Jr. and the Origins of the Battle Against ‘Woke’
By Evan Goldstein

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: A Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin