Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
News

Big-Time Sports Programs Tighten Rules on Athletes With Sexual-Assault Records

By Sarah Brown August 9, 2017
Brenda Tracy is among the activists, student leaders, and others calling on colleges to ban athletes with a history of sexual violence from their teams.
Brenda Tracy is among the activists, student leaders, and others calling on colleges to ban athletes with a history of sexual violence from their teams.Beth Nakamura / The Oregonian

Two months ago, Brenda Tracy sent a letter to every college president and athletics director in the “Power Five,” a group made up of the five wealthiest collegiate athletic conferences. Ms. Tracy implored them to do something she sees as common sense: ban athletes with a history of sexual misconduct.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Brenda Tracy is among the activists, student leaders, and others calling on colleges to ban athletes with a history of sexual violence from their teams.
Brenda Tracy is among the activists, student leaders, and others calling on colleges to ban athletes with a history of sexual violence from their teams.Beth Nakamura / The Oregonian

Two months ago, Brenda Tracy sent a letter to every college president and athletics director in the “Power Five,” a group made up of the five wealthiest collegiate athletic conferences. Ms. Tracy implored them to do something she sees as common sense: ban athletes with a history of sexual misconduct.

She has launched a national campaign against violent athletes because she doesn’t want other students to have the experience she did at Oregon State University. In 1998, she reported to police that four men, including two Oregon State football players, had gang-raped her.

There is a hyper-awareness of the need to put policies in place that are effective both in changing student-athlete attitudes and in influencing their behaviors.

The response from institutions has been mixed, Mr. Tracy said. Some didn’t respond to her; others said they already had a campuswide policy on past student misconduct and didn’t need to go further. But a few colleges indicated that they were looking into the possibility.

Institutions like Baylor University, the University of Oregon, and Vanderbilt University have faced scrutiny for high-profile sexual-assault cases, including situations in which athletes facing serious allegations were allowed to continue playing. As such cases have attracted public attention, some universities and athletic conferences are now trying to head off future scandals by keeping problem players off of their campuses to begin with.

A patchwork of policies determining eligibility for athletes with histories of sexual violence has emerged. Tackling the issue through policy isn’t easy, as few sexual assaults are reported to campuses or to the police, and fewer still result in a finding of responsibility or guilt.

Moreover, there isn’t consensus on how athletics departments should define “history.” Some coaches have said they believe only felony convictions should disqualify an athlete from competition, but many players who end up in trouble for sexual assault in college showed signs of misbehavior long before; it just wasn’t formally reported.

Three of the Power Five conferences (the Southeastern Conference, the Pac-12, and the Big 12) have approved restrictions on players with a record of sexual assault — though their policies vary. The two others (the Big Ten and the Atlantic Coast Conference) have chosen to leave the decision to individual campuses.

In the Big Ten, one institution — Indiana University at Bloomington — created its own policy earlier this year that applies to both prospective athletes and those who transfer in. Another — the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign — signaled last month that it will soon follow suit.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s encouraging that more colleges are talking about the issue of sexual assault in college athletics, Ms. Tracy and other anti-rape advocates say, and taking a stand against violent athletes is a good public-relations move. But, they ask, will these policies work in practice?

Another question is what role the National Collegiate Athletic Association should play in this debate, and whether it should step in and create consistent rules across campuses on the eligibility of players with sexual-assault records.

The association recently formed a Commission to Combat Campus Sexual Violence, and the group presented to the association’s Board of Governors this week.

Heightened Awareness

The Southeastern Conference was the pathfinder within the NCAA on this issue. In 2015, the chancellors and presidents of the SEC’s 14 member institutions passed a rule banning transfer athletes who had been disciplined by a previous college for “serious misconduct,” which was defined as sexual assault, domestic violence, or other forms of sexual violence.

ADVERTISEMENT

Last year the conference expanded the policy to include other forms of misconduct, such as stalking and interpersonal violence. This academic year, the SEC will review its rule again and discuss whether the ban should apply to incoming freshman players, said William King, the conference’s associate commissioner for legal affairs and compliance.

Campus officials within the SEC were initially concerned that athletics staffs wouldn’t have access to all of the information they needed to make a judgment about freshman recruits, given that most of them are minors, Mr. King said. Mark E. Keenum, president of Mississippi State University, leads the SEC campus officials’ group. “I think there is a hyper-awareness of the need to put policies in place that are effective both in changing student-athlete attitudes and in influencing their behaviors,” Mr. Keenum said in a statement provided by a university spokesman.

The SEC’s initial actions prompted conversations across college athletics, and the Big 12 and Pac-12 conferences both approved new policies related to athlete misconduct last year.

The Big 12 went a step beyond the SEC, covering both freshmen and transfer athletes in a rule requiring its institutions to “exercise diligence” to identify potential misconduct problems among prospective players. If they have committed “serious misconduct,” which includes “sexual assault, domestic violence, and other similar crimes involving moral turpitude,” they can’t play within the conference. (Baylor is a Big 12 institution.)

ADVERTISEMENT

The Pac-12’s rule prevents transfer athletes from receiving athletic scholarships or competing at a Pac-12 institution if they aren’t eligible to re-enroll at a previous college because they’ve been found responsible for behavioral problems like assault, harassment, or academic fraud. A conference official said the policy relies on athletes to self-disclose those past disciplinary issues.

Student leaders at Washington State University, which plays in the Pac-12, have asked campus leaders to enact an outright ban on athletes with a sexual-violence record, similar to the policies of Indiana and the Big 12. “If these people have a history of sexual misconduct, you don’t want to glorify and elevate them beyond the rest of our campus,” said Jordan Frost, the student body president.

For Indiana’s athletics director, Fred Glass, including freshman athletes in his institution’s policy was a no-brainer. Mr. Glass couldn’t understand why the SEC would prevent misbehaving athletes from transferring in but would allow players with a similar profile to join the team as freshmen.

“We want to have young people representing IU and IU athletics that everyone can be proud of,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

The policy also provides substantial due process for the athletes, which was important, Mr. Glass said. “Our policy only kicks in after an adjudication process,” whether it’s in a school, college, or court, he said, and the athlete must have the chance to present his or her side of the matter.

Prospective athletes can appeal, and that’s a process a university panel would handle, not the athletics department, he added. “We don’t pretend to have this be a silver bullet and be right every time.”

Illinois is still drafting its policy on athletes and sexual misconduct, said Kent Brown, a spokesman for the university’s athletics department.

“A policy on not accepting student-athletes with a history of domestic or sexual violence is being put in place as a way to make our student experience on campus a safer environment,” Mr. Brown said. “This can be a complicated issue, but we feel having a policy in place would make it clear that the University of Illinois will not accept this type of behavior.”

Cultural Change

Ultimately, Ms. Tracy wants to bring about cultural change by tying athletes’ conduct more closely to their eligibility. (After she reported her sexual assault to the police in 1998, the four men were arrested and the Oregon State football coach suspended two of the players for a game, but criminal charges were not filed because, for various reasons, she was reluctant to participate in a trial.)

ADVERTISEMENT

“What we’re saying to our prospective athletes is that not only do your grades matter, but your behavior matters,” she said, and the handful of policies that have been enacted so far are a step in the right direction.

Still, Katherine Redmond Brown, founder of the National Coalition Against Violent Athletes, questioned the effectiveness of the policies. In terms of athletes with past felony convictions for sexual misconduct, “you’re talking about less than a fraction of a percentage point of any population,” she said.

What we’re saying to our prospective athletes is that not only do your grades matter, but your behavior matters.

It’s more likely that athletes would be investigated and found responsible by their college for sexual misconduct, so preventing such athletes from transferring to other institutions might root out a few more problem players. Still, only a small percentage of campus sexual assaults are reported.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even the policies adopted by Indiana and the Big 12, which cover freshmen and transfers, might not do much to prevent prospective athletes who behaved badly in high school but have no formal record of misconduct, Ms. Redmond Brown said. While most colleges have improved their policies on responding to and preventing sexual assault in recent years, in response to pressure from the federal government, the same shift hasn’t happened at the K-12 level.

But a criminal conviction or formal disciplinary finding for sexual violence “is not the only basis on which we’d deny admission to people,” Mr. Glass said.

He pointed to a less-discussed piece of the policies that Indiana and a couple of conferences have adopted: a “due diligence” requirement that adds another layer of scrutiny to the mix. Indiana officials must specifically ask athletes about any previous discipline involving sexual violence, he said, and they also must interview teachers, coaches, administrators, and others about individual players, which could include discussions about sexual misconduct and other behavioral concerns.

The most effective way to keep problem athletes out of the collegiate athletics system is by focusing on the recruitment process, Ms. Redmond Brown said. “It all falls into the laps of coaches and scouts,” she said. “They know who to talk to and where to go to get the information that will tell them whether or not an athlete poses a behavioral risk.”

ADVERTISEMENT

But if you’re a college coach, particularly for big-time football or basketball programs, you tend to have about three years to start fielding a winning team, Ms. Redmond Brown said.

“You’re not thinking, I need to make sure that I recruit players that are emotionally sensitive and empathetic,” she said. “Fans and boosters are not concerned about the culture. They’re concerned about the wins.”

Sarah Brown writes about a range of higher-education topics, including sexual assault, race on campus, and Greek life. Follow her on Twitter @Brown_e_Points, or email her at sarah.brown@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the September 1, 2017, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Athletics
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
SarahBrown2024
About the Author
Sarah Brown
Sarah Brown is The Chronicle’s news editor. Follow her on Twitter @Brown_e_Points, or email her at sarah.brown@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

At Baylor, a Scandal’s Constant Drip Means a Relentless Spotlight
Amid Lurid Allegations, Minnesota Football Team Drops Threatened Boycott
Coaches Must Now ‘Step the Heck Out’ of Sex-Assault Investigations of Players

More News

Illustration showing the logos of Instragram, X, and TikTok being watch by a large digital eyeball
Race against the clock
Could New Social-Media Screening Create a Student-Visa Bottleneck?
Mangan-Censorship-0610.jpg
Academic Freedom
‘A Banner Year for Censorship’: More States Are Restricting Classroom Discussions on Race and Gender
On the day of his retirement party, Bob Morse poses for a portrait in the Washington, D.C., offices of U.S. News and World Report in June 2025. Morse led the magazine's influential and controversial college rankings efforts since its inception in 1988. Michael Theis, The Chronicle.
List Legacy
‘U.S. News’ Rankings Guru, Soon to Retire, Reflects on the Role He’s Played in Higher Ed
Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits

From The Review

A stack of coins falling over. Motion blur. Falling economy concept. Isolated on white.
The Review | Opinion
Will We Get a More Moderate Endowment Tax?
By Phillip Levine
Photo illustration of a classical column built of paper, with colored wires overtaking it like vines of ivy
The Review | Essay
The Latest Awful Ed-Tech Buzzword: “Learnings”
By Kit Nicholls
William F. Buckley, Jr.
The Review | Interview
William F. Buckley Jr. and the Origins of the Battle Against ‘Woke’
By Evan Goldstein

Upcoming Events

07-16-Advising-InsideTrack - forum assets v1_Plain.png
The Evolving Work of College Advising
Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin