Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Research

Boycott Debate Is Symptom of Broader Shift in American Studies

By Christopher Shea January 27, 2014
Mark Rice, a professor of American studies at St. John Fisher College, says that small undergraduate programs like his could be hurt by the blowback against some scholars’ political agendas.
Mark Rice, a professor of American studies at St. John Fisher College, says that small undergraduate programs like his could be hurt by the blowback against some scholars’ political agendas.St. John Fisher College

The furor over the vote by members of the American Studies Association to boycott Israeli institutions has reawakened questions about the organization, and American studies generally, that run far deeper than a single political stand.

The group’s critics say the incident—which has elicited condemnations by more than 80 college presidents and led many institutions to withdraw from membership—confirms their belief that American studies represents a nadir of academic posturing and identity politics.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The furor over the vote by members of the American Studies Association to boycott Israeli institutions has reawakened questions about the organization, and American studies generally, that run far deeper than a single political stand.

The group’s critics say the incident—which has elicited condemnations by more than 80 college presidents and led many institutions to withdraw from membership—confirms their belief that American studies represents a nadir of academic posturing and identity politics.

These critics charge that today’s American-studies scholars are a mere shadow of the pioneers in the field, who produced pathbreaking scholarship in the mid-20th century on topics like the Puritan mind, the relationship between Americans and the land, and the tension between pastoral and technological elements in American society.

Members of the ASA, meanwhile, argue that their opponents are cultural conservatives who are using criticism of the boycott as a vehicle to further their own retrograde views, scholars who would turn back the clock to a time before women’s studies, ethnic studies, and postcolonial theory made their mark.

When or if the anger over the boycott dies down, significant intellectual issues will remain, including which approaches are truly welcome in the field and whether political activism represents a departure from the American-studies mission or a logical extension of its recent scholarship.

“In truth, it has been a while since the ASA commanded wide respect as a heavyweight professional organization,” David Greenberg, an associate professor of history and journalism at Rutgers University at New Brunswick, wrote last month in The New Republic, in a typical attack. He quoted David Hollinger, a history professor at the University of California at Berkeley, who described the ASA as “a shell of its former self.”

Years of Debate

This is not the first time critics have deplored changes in the field. A decade ago, The New Republic was also the site of a much-noted broadside from Alan Wolfe, a professor of political science at Boston College, who argued that much American-studies scholarship evinced “hatred for America.”

Almost from the birth of American studies, a great amount of scholarly energy has been devoted to debating its methodology and proper subject of study. Indeed, its birthday is debatable (might Alexis de Tocqueville count as an American-studies scholar?), but institutionally it began to take hold in the mid-1900s, serving as home to scholars who found themselves gravitating toward a space “between” literature and history departments.

Harvard University’s graduate program in the History of American Civilization, created in 1937 (and recently renamed the Program in American Studies), was the first Ph.D. program in the field. Early classics in the discipline included Virgin Land: The American West as Symbol and Myth (1950), by Henry Nash Smith, and The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America (1964), by Leo Marx, which combined readings of literary texts with intellectual, political, and social history to trace themes in American identity. It was the era of “symbol-myth-image” studies.

Early American-studies debates centered on whether it should focus on literary texts or take a more sociological approach, but the first real upheaval came in the 1960s and 70s, as scholars embraced ethnic studies, black studies, and folklore studies; subsequently, queer studies and postcolonial studies entered the mix, not to mention film studies, visual culture, and environmental studies. By the 1980s, the archetypical American-studies book was no longer Marx’s The Machine in the Garden but, say, Janice Radway’s Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature (1984).

In recent years, the dominant approach has been “transnational American studies.” Lisa Duggan, the incoming American Studies Association president and a professor of social and cultural analysis at New York University, says people surprised by the boycott may not have been paying attention to this shift. (She and other association leaders insisted on answering questions via email, saying the news media have been misquoting them.) The “transnational” rubric encompasses studies of American imperialism abroad as well as interpretations of social and cultural developments within the United States as byproducts of global trends.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s clear that that evolutionary arc unsettles some scholars. Stephen J. Whitfield, a professor of American studies at Brandeis University, says he became disillusioned with the ASA as far back as the early 90s, when “it was becoming increasingly politicized in ways in which—though I might share the politics, as a citizen—I didn’t think were remotely appropriate for a scholarly organization.” American Quarterly, the association’s flagship journal, was becoming “increasingly jargon-infested” and focused on “esoteric” subjects, he says.

In response to such charges, Curtis Marez, the current ASA president and an associate professor of ethnic studies at the University of California at San Diego, says by email that the group remains receptive to various scholarly approaches. He points out that American Quarterly has twice since 2009 won the prize for Best Special Issue from the Council of Editors of Learned Journals.

The boycott has served as a “Trojan horse,” Mr. Marez says, “enabling some scholars to indirectly express their resentment against a turn toward questions related to race and sexuality.”

In general, American-studies scholars today presuppose a skepticism that anything coherent can be said about something so broad as “America,” and they ritualistically lambaste “neoliberalism” at home and abroad. Richard H. King, a professor emeritus of American and Canadian studies at the University of Nottingham, says the nomenclature works quite differently abroad: Whereas in Britain “American studies” remains a generic term for everyone interested in American subject matter, in the United States it connotes a particular radical perspective and a particular scholarly focus, “the race-class-gender-sexuality cluster of concerns—plus the transnational turn.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“I’m not totally out of sympathy with the focus on those issues,” he says, but it leaves much out, he thinks, including an interest in American regionalism and in the kind of intellectual history once common in the field. (Much of Mr. King’s own work has focused on race relations and the American South.)

Influence on Other Fields

Some critics cast American studies as a victim of its own success: “Cultural history, intellectual history, women’s history—all these things got their start in American studies,” says Bruce Kuklick, a professor emeritus of history at the University of Pennsylvania and editor of American Quarterly from 1974 to 1982. Once scholars with an interdisciplinary bent were able to do all of those things within history and English departments, they had less need of American studies, per se, he says, and the association began to be taken over by people with an aggressively political take on the field. Many of these new-breed American-studies scholars came from ethnic-studies departments, he suggests.

All six current members of the ASA executive committee have written on gender or ethnicity, but only Mr. Marez has a sole appointment in an ethnic-studies department.

Ms. Duggan, the incoming president, responds by email that the association “is absolutely open” for those scholars who retreated from the ASA to return and engage at conferences and events: “Those who have been inactive should get active, rather than blame the more active members for their absence.”

ADVERTISEMENT

In terms of sheer numbers, the group’s membership has remained steady, ranging between 4,000 and 5,000 for the past 20 years, and it has seen a net gain of nearly 200 members since the boycott vote, its leaders say.

The flaring up of culture-war language upsets some ASA members. “I’m uncomfortable with the way that people who are against the boycott have used the language of ‘taking back’ or ‘reclaiming’ ASA,” says David J. Leonard, an associate professor in the department of critical culture, gender, and race studies at Washington State University. The language assumes that there are “rightful owners” of the field, he says, and dismisses decades of American-studies scholarship.

Some scholars see a straightforward generational divide in pro- and anti-ASA sentiment, but the divisions are not nearly so neat. Nor do beliefs about scholarship map precisely onto beliefs about the boycott. “I have been working on gender and its implications for race and class for 20 years,” says Mary C. Kelley, a professor of history, American culture, and women’s studies at the University of Michigan who was also one of eight former association presidents who condemned the boycott in a joint letter. She says she believes that when the group takes political positions, it should focus on academic issues like the adjunct crisis and funding for the humanities.

So does Mark Rice, a professor of American studies at St. John Fisher College, in Rochester, N.Y. He argues that a firm line should be drawn between transnational scholarship, which he embraces—he has published in the Journal of Transnational American Studies—and international political activism.

ADVERTISEMENT

Around the time of the boycott vote, Rice started a blog called the Future of American Studies, where he has made the case that the programs most likely to be hurt by the ASA’s forceful move into politics are those like his, at small- to middle-size colleges without graduate programs. In financially straitened times, interdisciplinary programs have been under scrutiny from administrators, Mr. Rice says, and he believes that the ASA’s energies should be focused on demonstrating the intellectual vitality of the field, its centrality to colleges’ missions.

In flush times, political and cultural warfare might bear no cost. But with the humanities already being eyed by administrators eager for savings, programs that can’t come to a basic agreement about what their members should be doing may draw unwanted attention.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Scholarship & Research
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Christopher Shea
Christopher Shea is an assistant editor of Outlook/PostEverything at The Washington Post. Formerly, he was a contributing writer at The Chronicle of Higher Education.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin