Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
Administration

Can New Online Rankings Really Measure Colleges’ Brand Strength? Unlikely, Experts Say

By Kathryn Masterson January 30, 2011
Ian Hsu, director of Internet media outreach at Stanford U., says colleges shouldn’t get too wrapped up in the rankings: “It can be very tempting to chase after every ranking or goal that third parties are trying to sell.”
Ian Hsu, director of Internet media outreach at Stanford U., says colleges shouldn’t get too wrapped up in the rankings: “It can be very tempting to chase after every ranking or goal that third parties are trying to sell.”Linda A. Cicero, Stanford News Service

For a college, what’s the value of a tweet? Or a Facebook item and mention on a blog?

In recent months, a handful of companies have introduced rankings that claim to calculate a college’s brand value or online influence by looking at the attention an institution receives online. One ranking found that the University of Wisconsin at Madison has the strongest brand equity among universities, based on its number of mentions across the Internet. Another named Stanford University the most influential college on Twitter.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

For a college, what’s the value of a tweet? Or a Facebook item and mention on a blog?

In recent months, a handful of companies have introduced rankings that claim to calculate a college’s brand value or online influence by looking at the attention an institution receives online. One ranking found that the University of Wisconsin at Madison has the strongest brand equity among universities, based on its number of mentions across the Internet. Another named Stanford University the most influential college on Twitter.

Marketing experts expect the number of online rankings like these to grow, especially because there’s no single way to quantify a college’s success in online marketing. The question is: Based on the formulas used in the calculations, do rankings actually tell colleges anything useful?

Not really, marketing experts and college leaders say. While rankings such as Klout’s college Twitter analysis and Global Language Monitor’s TrendTopper MediaBuzz—two of those announced in recent weeks—are interesting, they capture a sliver of what colleges are trying to do with their marketing efforts. And they don’t get at what colleges really want to know: whether their brand messages are reaching the people they’re going after.

Michael Stoner, president of mStoner, a Chicago-based communications firm, is skeptical that any such ranking has much meaning and value for colleges. While titillating, he says, “I don’t think it really tells us anything.”

Colleges and marketers are just starting to try to understand how to measure the success of their social-media efforts, says Mr. Stoner. Many are counting “touches"—the number of Twitter followers, the hits on a Web site, the number of friends or comments on a Facebook page. The more difficult question, he says, is, What do these measurements mean? Do tweets, blog posts, and Facebook “likes” translate into someone choosing your college, recommending it to a friend, attending an alumni event, or making a donation?

Internet Buzz

According to Global Language Monitor, a company in Austin, Tex., that tracks language usage on the Internet including the most-used words of the year, and has ranked colleges for three years, the quantity of online mentions can determine the strength of a college’s market position in the market.

Based on the company’s calculations, the University of Wisconsin at Madison had the strongest brand equity last year, based on the number of times its name was mentioned on the Internet, including blogs, social media, and newspapers. The methodology for the company’s TrendTopper analysis is relatively uncomplicated—the rating looks only at the raw number of mentions an institution gets and how that number changes over time, regardless of whether those mentions appear on the front page of The New York Times or inside a small-town newspaper. It also does not differentiate between positive mentions and negatives.

The lack of nuance doesn’t bother Paul JJ Payack, president of the company. He argues that straightforward counting makes his rankings simple to use and more objective than more-established rankings such as U.S. News, which factors in opinions from other colleges and guidance counselors. Those rankings can be “clubby” and favor insiders, he says, while his system is more democratic, spanning a wider range of sources and showing the true value of a college’s brand.

“It really does tell you how you’re conversing with the world at large,” Mr. Payack says.

He has sold only about 80 of the e-books that list the rankings since their release, in January, and last week cut the price from $19.97 to $9.97. He says prospective students and parents could find the rankings useful if they’re deciding between two colleges that vary in price but have relatively equal brand rankings.

Expensive Options

The idea that such a ranking should be used in a college search is absurd, says Elizabeth Scarborough, chief executive of SimpsonScarborough, a higher-education marketing and branding firm. “I don’t even think they’re relevant to prospective students—they’re a distraction more than anything else,” she says.

ADVERTISEMENT

TrendTopper isn’t a measure of a college’s particular fit for students, or even of brand value, Ms. Scarborough says. Instead, the ratings demonstrate how good a college’s media-relations department is at getting the institution’s name out.

There are better ways to measure brand strength, but they’re much more expensive, Ms. Scarborough says. Her firm’s research, which can cost $50,000 to $400,000, includes surveys of key audiences, such as prospective students, alumni, and business and community leaders, to find out their perceptions of the institution. Several years later, the surveys are redone to see what changes in opinions and attitudes have occurred.

At American University, which recently started a “Wonk” branding campaign, monitoring social-media usage is a good short-term technique for testing the effectiveness of a campaign, says Terry Flannery, executive director of university communications and marketing. For example, on the day it started the campaign, American counted 135 Twitter mentions that used the “Wonk” hashtag in 12 hours (compared with about 10 to 20 that use the “AmericanU” hashtag on a regular day) and 4,100 visits to the “Wonk” Web site in the campaign’s first week. But long term, those kind of numbers don’t tell whether perceptions were changed by the campaign, or if the loyalty of alumni was strengthened. “That would not be something we’d hang our hats on by itself,” Ms. Flannery says. “I’d use it in the mix, but I wouldn’t be justifying my budget for next year on it.”

American’s campaign gained both praise and criticism, the latter from students who found “Wonk” silly or strange. Ms. Flannery says the university expected that range of reactions and has spent time explaining to people why it’s a good label for the institution and those associated with it.

ADVERTISEMENT

Still, it isn’t enough to just generate buzz, says Larry D. Lauer, vice chancellor for government affairs at Texas Christian University and a marketing expert. Colleges need to go after specific audiences they want to reach. A win in the Rose Bowl earned the Horned Frogs positive media attention. But whether that helps advance the university in its goals depends on what Texas Christian does with that open door.

“We need to walk through it and tell the rest of the story,” Mr. Lauer says.

Measuring Clout

Ian Hsu, director of Internet media outreach for Stanford, which was named No. 1 in the recent Klout rankings, says he looks at outside companies’ rankings methodology. (Klout, for example, measures influence through a Twitter user’s number of followers compared with the number the user follows, messages that are retweeted, and lists a Twitter user is included on.) But rankings aren’t his main considerations when he’s planning strategy for Stanford’s approach on Twitter, Facebook, and other platforms.

“We don’t try to go out of our way to influence these rankings,” Mr. Hsu says.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rather, he looks at online surveys that Stanford conducts to try to get at whether its social-media outreach matches its core goals and objectives. Are more people seeing that the university is creating the next generation of leaders, that Stanford faculty are experts in their fields, and that the university is making a difference in solving world problems? Do alumni feel connected to the community?

To the extent he can understand whether outreach efforts are moving perceptions on those questions, Mr. Hsu says, that’s the most useful information. And such research can sometimes be done inexpensively with in-house online surveys.

Given how Twitter followers and Facebook friends can be quantified, he expects more companies to come forward with rankings. As that happens, he recommends that colleges don’t get too wrapped up in them. “It can be very tempting to chase after every ranking or goal that third parties are trying to sell,” Mr. Hsu says. Instead, colleges should “really understand what you’re trying to accomplish” and go after that.

Looking for Data

Dennis Berkey, president of Worcester Polytechnic Institute, admits paying attention to the new rankings, including Klout and TrendTopper. As a college, you want to be mentioned, he says. And if you find out no one’s talking about your institution, you have a problem.

ADVERTISEMENT

But without knowing more about the methodology behind the rankings and what kind of impression is created when people hear about his college in various media, there isn’t much he can—or would—do with that information.

Worcester recently hired consultants to do research for a branding campaign, including surveys about the perceptions of the college held by students, peer institutions, and institutions that award research grants. Mr. Berkey wants to know if people are aware of the kinds of scientific research on his campus, or that Worcester wants its students to use their engineering and math skills to solve world problems. Over the course of several years, the institution is likely to spend millions of dollars on marketing research and athe branding campaign that will come from that work.

“I want to be very certain I have full, complete answers to questions before I move,” Mr. Berkey says. “We’re engineers. We want to see the data.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Kathryn Masterson
Kathryn Masterson reported on the almost-$30-billion world of college fund raising for The Chronicle of Higher Education. She also covered other areas of higher-education management, including endowments.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Illustration showing the logos of Instragram, X, and TikTok being watch by a large digital eyeball
Race against the clock
Could New Social-Media Screening Create a Student-Visa Bottleneck?
Mangan-Censorship-0610.jpg
Academic Freedom
‘A Banner Year for Censorship’: More States Are Restricting Classroom Discussions on Race and Gender
On the day of his retirement party, Bob Morse poses for a portrait in the Washington, D.C., offices of U.S. News and World Report in June 2025. Morse led the magazine's influential and controversial college rankings efforts since its inception in 1988. Michael Theis, The Chronicle.
List Legacy
‘U.S. News’ Rankings Guru, Soon to Retire, Reflects on the Role He’s Played in Higher Ed
Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits

From The Review

A stack of coins falling over. Motion blur. Falling economy concept. Isolated on white.
The Review | Opinion
Will We Get a More Moderate Endowment Tax?
By Phillip Levine
Photo illustration of a classical column built of paper, with colored wires overtaking it like vines of ivy
The Review | Essay
The Latest Awful Ed-Tech Buzzword: “Learnings”
By Kit Nicholls
William F. Buckley, Jr.
The Review | Interview
William F. Buckley Jr. and the Origins of the Battle Against ‘Woke’
By Evan Goldstein

Upcoming Events

07-16-Advising-InsideTrack - forum assets v1_Plain.png
The Evolving Work of College Advising
Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin