Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Administration

Changes in U. of California’s Medical Plans Worry Some Employees

By Don Troop October 10, 2013
Faculty members at the U. of California at Santa Barbara (pictured) said the change in health-care plans constituted what one of them called “a substantial hardship” for employees on campuses, like Santa Barbara, that lack teaching hospitals.
Faculty members at the U. of California at Santa Barbara (pictured) said the change in health-care plans constituted what one of them called “a substantial hardship” for employees on campuses, like Santa Barbara, that lack teaching hospitals.Wikimedia Commons

The University of California is overhauling its systemwide health-insurance plans to save on costs and better align with the Obama administration’s Affordable Care Act, but some employees are angry over indications that they’ll be paying more just to keep their existing level of service.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The University of California is overhauling its systemwide health-insurance plans to save on costs and better align with the Obama administration’s Affordable Care Act, but some employees are angry over indications that they’ll be paying more just to keep their existing level of service.

System officials say that the changes are needed to avoid looming cost increases and that, in most cases, employees who pick the plan that is right for them will end up saving money and getting better service.

Dwaine B. Duckett, vice president for human resources in the office of the system’s president, said this week that the university would discontinue its Anthem health-care plans along with its Health Net Full HMO.

Replacing those will be the Blue Shield Health Savings Plan and UC Care, a three-tier preferred-provider plan that gives employees access to University of California doctors and medical centers as well as to the 88 percent of California doctors who belong to the Blue Shield PPO network, according to Mr. Duckett. He said about 10,000 of the 120,000 employees who are served by the university’s health-care system would have to switch networks as of January 1, 2014.

“The big question everyone’s asking,” he said, “is, ‘Is my doctor in or not?’”

In fact, he said, 97 percent of the providers who were available in the plans that are being scrapped will be available in the new ones too.

Mr. Duckett emphasized that he did not want to come across as callous: “We are completely sensitive to the fact that if you are in that 3 percent that does not have your doctor in, that’s a tremendous deal for you.”

‘A Line in the Sand’

Five of the 10 University of California campuses don’t have their own medical centers, meaning that Blue Shield, which will run the UC Care plan, had to negotiate fee structures with local hospitals and other health-care providers. In the end, negotiators got most of the providers to play ball—sometimes with a little nudging from senior university administrators.

Where negotiations were successful, such as around the University of California at Santa Cruz, people like Barry Bowman, a biology professor and member of the systemwide Academic Senate Committee on Faculty Welfare, feel a tremendous sense of relief. For employees on his campus, “it’s a win-win,” he said. “We have an even broader choice of doctors. For many people, our rates are actually going to go down.”

But Peter J. Taylor, chief financial officer for the university system, said the provider that dominates the area around the University of California at Santa Barbara, Cottage Health Systems, is demanding fees that would exceed what the university pays its own doctors.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Cottage has drawn a line in the sand and said they simply won’t take less than what they want to get paid,” Mr. Taylor said.

Many of the Cottage providers will still be available, for a modest copayment, to members of the Health Net Blue & Gold HMO. But for members of the UC Care PPO, the providers will be “Tier 2,” meaning the members will be paying a percentage of the full cost of service rather than a fixed copayment.

That has angered some employees at Santa Barbara, who argue that the costs and deductibles will fall more heavily on them than on their peers at other campuses.

Henry T. Yang, chancellor of the Santa Barbara campus, said in a statement on Tuesday that administrators were “deeply concerned” that UC Care’s first-tier provider network did not include local physicians and services.

‘Trying to Find a Balance’

Others were more explicit in their criticism.

Nelson Lichtenstein, a history professor at Santa Barbara, said the change in plans constituted “a substantial hardship” for employees on campuses without teaching hospitals. Mr. Lichtenstein, who is president of the UCSB Faculty Association and is an occasional contributor to The Chronicle Review, was among the speakers last week at a town-hall forum where employees confronted Mr. Duckett about the shift in coverage.

ADVERTISEMENT

Chief among their complaints was the apparent lack of comparably priced services among the 10 campuses.

But Mr. Taylor, the chief financial officer, said that Cottage’s unwillingness to negotiate put the university in a difficult position. Simply subsidizing the Santa Barbara employees’ costs was not an option, he said, because it would raise individual premiums systemwide by $323 a year.

“That’s asking 18,400 non-UC-Santa Barbara employees to pay out of pocket tremendously so that about 600 Santa Barbara employees would have access to this,” he said. “We’re trying to find a balance. We don’t have an inexhaustible supply of money, and yet we want to provide a solid benefit to our faculty and staff.”

Nathan Brostrom, the university system’s executive vice president for business operations, said administrators also wanted a plan that would align better with the Obama administration’s Affordable Care Act, which emphasizes greater medical management and focuses on preventive care and wellness. And looking at other large employers, he said, “we were really the outlier in not having a self-funded, self-insured plan.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Christopher Newfield, a professor of American studies at Santa Barbara and an author of the influential Remaking the University blog, described his concerns over the new plans on Wednesday in a detailed post that examined how his partner had fared in the existing Anthem insurance system after suffering a deep cut in a kitchen accident.

Mr. Newfield, also an occasional Review contributor who is now on sabbatical in Britain, said in an e-mail message that the potentially higher costs for out-of-network care under the new plan are another significant issue for Santa Barbara employees.

“This is a big deal for a lot of faculty who are gone a lot (as I am, as are many lab scientists on big collaborations, etc.),” he wrote by e-mail.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Troop_Don.jpg
About the Author
Don Troop
Don Troop joined The Chronicle in 1998 and worked variously as a copy editor, reporter, and assigning editor until September 2024.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin