Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
Commentary

China’s Pernicious Presence on American Campuses

By Peter Wood February 26, 2018
Students at Augusta U., in Georgia, join in a parade held by the Confucius Institute there.
Students at Augusta U., in Georgia, join in a parade held by the Confucius Institute there. Jon-Michael Sullivan, The Augusta Chronicle via AP images

Since 2005, the People’s Republic of China has established more than 100 Confucius Institutes at American colleges. The philosopher’s name is a smoke screen. These institutes have nothing to do with Confucius; they are instruments of China’s statecraft.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Students at Augusta U., in Georgia, join in a parade held by the Confucius Institute there.
Students at Augusta U., in Georgia, join in a parade held by the Confucius Institute there. Jon-Michael Sullivan, The Augusta Chronicle via AP images

Since 2005, the People’s Republic of China has established more than 100 Confucius Institutes at American colleges. The philosopher’s name is a smoke screen. These institutes have nothing to do with Confucius; they are instruments of China’s statecraft.

Confucius Institutes could be wholesome attempts to foster cultural exchange, in the manner of the Alliance Française or the Goethe-Institut. Outwardly they have some of that character. Confucius Institutes offer courses in Chinese language, culture, and the arts. But the Chinese Communist Party, which organizes and funds the Confucius Institutes through a state agency, the Hanban, is not known for altruistic cultural outreach.

My colleagues and I at the National Association of Scholars set out two years ago to learn how Confucius Institutes came to be planted on American campuses, how they operate, and how they influence their host institutions. Last April we released our report, “Outsourced to China: Confucius Institutes and Soft Power in American Higher Education.” The author, Rachelle Peterson, focused on 12 institutes in New Jersey and New York.

In her research, almost immediately she encountered a wall of secrecy. The agreements between the Hanban and the colleges were secret. The workings of the institutes were secret. The classrooms were off-limits. Of the few people connected to the institutes who were willing to speak at all, most insisted on off-the-record conversations remote from campus. This didn’t seem much like Alliance Française or the Goethe-Institut.

I don’t need to retell Rachelle’s story, which is easily accessible. The broad conclusions were that the institutes stifle academic freedom, censor teachers, engage in unlawful religious discrimination, disseminate Chinese propaganda, and violate norms of transparency.

The report received widespread attention and, nearly a year later, has become a subject of interest on Capitol Hill, from the FBI, and other government agencies. On February 13, FBI Director Christopher Wray told the Senate Intelligence Committee that the FBI had been watching Confucius Institutes “for a while.”

When we began our study of the institutes, we encountered bland refusals to talk, obfuscation, and threats. We had to use Freedom of Information requests to obtain copies of the agreements between public universities and the Hanban, and we learned that the official Hanban versions of the documents differed on key points. American academic administrators turned out to be every bit as guarded as the institutes’ own directors. The reason soon became clear.

First, colleges receive substantial financial support for hosting the institutes. Second, key academic administrators find themselves suddenly in demand as speakers in China. Third, the administrators discover that China tightly controls the number of Chinese students permitted to enroll at a particular American college. And fourth, China frequently offers the additional enticement to the college of opening an overseas program in China.

Confucius Institutes, in short, become the first thread of a silk cocoon. For a relatively modest price, the Chinese government gains enormous influence over major American colleges and universities. And it gets privileged access to American campuses, from which it exercises other kinds of influence.

ADVERTISEMENT

It is no wonder that Sen. Marco Rubio, of Florida, in February called on four colleges (and one high school) in his state to end their agreements with the Confucius Institutes headquarters. The University of West Florida promptly announced that it would not renew its Confucius Institute contract. Rubio cited the decision by the University of Chicago in 2014 to cut off negotiations to renew its contract with its Confucius Institute. Chicago received a strong push from faculty members, who were roused to action by the eminent anthropology professor Marshall Sahlins.

Since then a handful of other colleges have thought twice about this particular foreign entanglement. Pennsylvania State University followed the University of Chicago almost immediately. In January the University of Texas at Austin changed its mind about accepting funding from another Chinese organization, the China-United States Exchange Foundation. Austin’s thinking was clarified by a letter from Senator Ted Cruz, of Texas, who warned that having such a partner might compromise the university.

China itself may be reassessing its strategy of attempting to influence America by means of these campus-based institutes. Xinhua News, China’s official press agency, has reported a program to “reform” the Confucius Institutes in light of challenges and Westerners’ lamentable tendency to misconstrue what the institutes do. Rachelle Peterson connected these promised reforms to declarations by Ma Jianfei, a deputy executive of the Confucius Institute headquarters, and by a key group presided over by President Xi Jinping, which suggest that reform in this case will mean redoubled secrecy and tighter state control.

Universities since the Middle Ages have drawn students and scholars across the borders of kingdoms, languages, and cultures. The leading American scholars of the 19th century often benefited from studying in Europe, and the United States has become a destination for scholars and students from around the world. These are essential strengths of American higher education.

ADVERTISEMENT

That said, American higher education is still American higher education. It has an obligation to uphold the rule of law and other bedrock principles of a free society. When an American college entangles itself in a relationship with an adversarial foreign power, those principles can be threatened.

In the case of Confucius Institutes, we’ve moved beyond threats to serious compromises. The best answer to this situation is for the federal government to clarify the choices:

  • If American colleges want to take funding from China for Confucius Institute courses in Chinese language and culture, they ought to do without the equivalent U.S. funding, especially in Title VI programs, which provide foreign-language and area-studies education.
  • The Higher Education Act should be amended to require greater financial transparency when it comes to gifts and payments from foreign entities.
  • The exemption of Confucius Institutes and the Hanban from the Foreign Agents Registration Act should be eliminated.

American scholars who say or write anything critical of China’s political regime should not have to look over their shoulders at Confucius Institute personnel or wonder if their own college will impede their research in the spirit of keeping up amicable relations with the Hanban.

ADVERTISEMENT

Colleges in the United States may have been initially attracted to these institutes because they appeared to be a wholesome form of cultural outreach. But that proved to be an illusion. We now know they operate under a veil of secrecy in which they engage in dubious activities.

China’s response to these criticisms has been to mock them — in the words of China’s Global Times — as “a form of hysterical American nationalism.” The official Chinese defense of the Confucius Institutes is that American critics are exaggerating cultural differences and demonstrating their own lack of confidence in dealing with a “strategic competitor.”

Those are taunts, not answers, and they underscore the aggressive character of the Confucius Institutes. American colleges can and should find better ways to introduce their students to Chinese culture.

Peter Wood is president of the National Association of Scholars.

A version of this article appeared in the March 16, 2018, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
International Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

House Panel Plans to Scrutinize U.S. Universities’ Ties With China
AAUP Rebukes Colleges for Chinese Institutes and Censures Northeastern Ill.

More News

Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through a flat black and white university building and a landscape bearing the image of a $100 bill.
Budget Troubles
‘Every Revenue Source Is at Risk’: Under Trump, Research Universities Are Cutting Back
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome topping a jar of money.
Budget Bill
Republicans’ Plan to Tax Higher Ed and Slash Funding Advances in Congress
Allison Pingree, a Cambridge, Mass. resident, joined hundreds at an April 12 rally urging Harvard to resist President Trump's influence on the institution.
International
Trump Administration Revokes Harvard’s Ability to Enroll International Students
Photo-based illustration of an open book with binary code instead of narrative paragraphs
Culture Shift
The Reading Struggle Meets AI

From The Review

Illustration of a Gold Seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
What Trump’s Accreditation Moves Get Right
By Samuel Negus
Illustration of a torn cold seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
The Weaponization of Accreditation
By Greg D. Pillar, Laurie Shanderson
Protestors gather outside the Pro-Palestinian encampment on the campus of UCLA in Los Angeles on Wednesday, May 1, 2024.
The Review | Conversation
Are Colleges Rife With Antisemitism? If So, What Should Be Done?
By Evan Goldstein, Len Gutkin

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin