Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
The Chronicle Review

Christopher Hitchens: The Last Public Intellectual?

By Russell Jacoby December 18, 2011
Christopher Hitchens, 1949-2011
Christopher Hitchens, 1949-2011Stephen Voss, Redux

With the death of Christopher Hitchens, a singular voice has been silenced. Unbuttoned and unacademic, Hitchens weighed into almost every subject with panache and passion. He wrote as powerfully on Proust or the Kurds as on George Orwell or American eroticism. He authored books on the Elgin Marbles and Mother Teresa. He was a nimble wordsmith and talksmith who danced around most antagonists. His energy and ready knowledge, his eloquence and quickness, his love of controversy and repartee set him apart not only from an aloof professoriate but from vacuous talking heads.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

With the death of Christopher Hitchens, a singular voice has been silenced. Unbuttoned and unacademic, Hitchens weighed into almost every subject with panache and passion. He wrote as powerfully on Proust or the Kurds as on George Orwell or American eroticism. He authored books on the Elgin Marbles and Mother Teresa. He was a nimble wordsmith and talksmith who danced around most antagonists. His energy and ready knowledge, his eloquence and quickness, his love of controversy and repartee set him apart not only from an aloof professoriate but from vacuous talking heads.

Nor did he ever trim his sails. For better or worse he followed his own compass. He came from the left and never ceased to champion the Palestinians, savage religion, or lambaste Henry Kissinger for foreign-policy crimes. At the same time, his ardent support for the invasion of Iraq and his talk of Islamic fascism put him in the company of conservatives and war hawks. Hitchens was a leftist who became a rightist who remained a leftist.

He belonged to a coterie of British radicals loosely centered around the London-based journal New Left Review. Many made careers in the United States—people such as Perry Anderson and his brother, Benedict Anderson, Alexander Cockburn, and, for a while, Robin Blackburn. To Americans, those English arrivals always seemed supremely educated, articulate, and cosmopolitan. Indeed, like Hitchens they all attended Oxford or Cambridge, where they honed their debating skills.

Hitchens himself found England too confining. “Life in Britain,” he remarked, seemed like “one long antechamber to a room that had too many barriers.” As a young man he moved to the States, and he began writing a column for the leftist weekly The Nation.

His causes were many, and his rumpled look, quick wit, and poisonous pen abetted his career. He became close to Edward Said, the Palestinian-American professor, with whom he edited a book on the Palestinians. About this time, Hitchens, who was baptized into the Church of England, learned that his mother, who had committed suicide, had been Jewish. The discovery was not unwelcome, and Hitchens delved into his past, looking for distant family. To be sure, it did not alter a whit his politics; on occasion he would identify himself as “an atheist and semi-Semitic polemicist.”

But what were his politics? On some issues, he never deviated: his denunciation of the death penalty, torture, and religion; his defense of free speech; and his hatred of colonialism. However, Hitchens interjected himself in the last moment of the Clinton impeachment by offering to testify that a Clinton aide had lied. To his friends, that seemed strange. Why fuel a politically driven witch hunt?

But bigger surprises lay ahead. Hitchens had already been riled by the weak reply of leftists to the Iranian fatwa calling for the death of his friend, the author Salman Rushdie. He asked pointedly: If a left can’t militantly defend free speech, what could it do? Then came the attacks of September 11, 2001, and the response of the left seemed wobbly to Hitchens. Some leftists suggested that the United States deserved a violent wake-up call. On the contrary, Hitchens believed that Islamic extremism spelled barbarism, if not fascism, and should be fought tooth and nail. He resigned his post at The Nation and joined those advocating the invasion of Iraq, using his considerable talents to flay his former comrades.

Hitchens died the day the war in Iraq officially ended for Americans. But the invasion proved to be a debacle wrapped in a debacle, almost criminally flawed in its planning and execution. In his 2010 memoir, Hitch-22, Hitchens rues American mistakes that led to looting and misery. He writes that he is well aware of “the impeachable incompetence of the Bush administration.” He regrets that he did not ask the simplest questions, which his father, a commander in the Royal Navy, would have raised, such as: Do you have troops to guard the National Museum of Iraq? But the looting of the museum was only one of many failings, Hitchens admits, that have “permanently disfigured the record of those of us” who argued for the invasion.

His record is, in fact, damaged by that war, but it remains a single, albeit large, entry in a vast body of work. Consider his new 800-page collection, Arguably, which covers subjects as varied as Isaac Newton and Vladimir Nabokov and demonstrates that Hitchens cannot be tedious. In the introduction, he notes the cancer that recently struck him and counts in months his remaining life. Without missing a beat, he salutes those who have given their lives so others can live better. He dedicates the volume to an instigator of the Arab Spring, the Tunisian vendor who set himself on fire and triggered the political upheavals. Hitchens recalls another death: In 1969 Jan Palach, a Czech student, immolated himself in Wenceslas Square in protest against the Soviet occupation of his country. A young student himself at the time, Hitchens organized a rally against the occupation, and later became associated with the Palach Press, a center for East European dissent. This is the Hitchens we honor and treasure.

In the age of insufferable pundits and bland English professors, Hitchens summoned up a different possibility—the public intellectual as literate, lucid, and committed. Was he the last of the nonacademic intellectuals? Or was he something else, a very talented journalist? He resented the put-down that someone’s writing was “journalistic” and saw himself as working the vein that ran from Thomas Paine to George Orwell. At least some of his work ranks with that company’s. But he may have been sui generis, neither scribbler nor pedant. To whom can he be compared? Hitchens contained multitudes. Perhaps the absence of a cohort of public intellectuals meant that he carried that much more weight. Perhaps he was a public intellectual after its decline.

ADVERTISEMENT

At least this can be said: Hitchens never sat on the sidelines. He wrung every drop of life from life. He wrote, traveled, and drank long into the night.

In a message to me a year ago—our lives occasionally intersected, and he wrote a blurb for my most recent book—he said that “we old Bolsheviks should stick together.” I’ve pondered the phrase: we old Bolsheviks. Perhaps there is something to it, and through it all, Hitchens remained an old Bolshevik. He died in the saddle (like the old Bolshevik Trotsky), and wrote unflinchingly about cancer and his coming death. He made mistakes (like Trotsky), but fought with incomparable energy, rare courage, and sinewy prose for those everywhere who get cheated of life and liberty.

So long, Hitch! We miss you already.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Russell Jacoby
Russell Jacoby is a professor of history at the University of California at Los Angeles.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of two researcher's hands putting dollar signs into a beaker leaking green liquid.
'Life Support'
As the Nation’s Research Model Falls Apart, Private Money Becomes a Band-Aid
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through a flat black and white university building and a landscape bearing the image of a $100 bill.
Budget Troubles
‘Every Revenue Source Is at Risk’: Under Trump, Research Universities Are Cutting Back
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome topping a jar of money.
Budget Bill
Republicans’ Plan to Tax Higher Ed and Slash Funding Advances in Congress
Allison Pingree, a Cambridge, Mass. resident, joined hundreds at an April 12 rally urging Harvard to resist President Trump's influence on the institution.
International
Hours After Harvard Sues, Court Blocks Trump’s Move to Ban Enrollment of Foreign Students

From The Review

Photo-based illustration of the sculpture, The Thinker, interlaced with anotehr image of a robot posed as The Thinker with bits of binary code and red strips weaved in.
The Review | Essay
What I Learned Serving on My University’s AI Committee
By Megan Fritts
Illustration of a Gold Seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
What Trump’s Accreditation Moves Get Right
By Samuel Negus
Illustration of a torn cold seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
The Weaponization of Accreditation
By Greg D. Pillar, Laurie Shanderson

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin