Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Trump Webinar Series
    Mental Health Forum
    Using Big Data to Improve Social Mobility
Sign In
Technology

College Libraries Push Back as Publishers Raise Some E-Book Prices

By Avi Wolfman-Arent June 16, 2014
Susan Stearns, the Boston Library Consortium’s executive director, says 
a recent surge in e-book prices left librarians feeling ambushed. “There was a very, very deep collective sigh of, ‘Oh my gosh, not again.’”
Susan Stearns, the Boston Library Consortium’s executive director, says a recent surge in e-book prices left librarians feeling ambushed. “There was a very, very deep collective sigh of, ‘Oh my gosh, not again.’”M. Scott Brauer for The Chronicle

In mid-May, the Boston Library Consortium, which represents 17 academic libraries in New England, received an abrupt and unsettling phone call from ebrary, an e-book library owned by the aggregator ProQuest. A company representative said 11 academic publishers, including major players like Taylor & Francis and Oxford University Press, would be raising the cost of short-term e-book loans effective June 1. In some cases the increase would be as much as 300 percent.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

In mid-May, the Boston Library Consortium, which represents 17 academic libraries in New England, received an abrupt and unsettling phone call from ebrary, an e-book library owned by the aggregator ProQuest. A company representative said 11 academic publishers, including major players like Taylor & Francis and Oxford University Press, would be raising the cost of short-term e-book loans effective June 1. In some cases the increase would be as much as 300 percent.

The suddenness, scale, and timing of the changes—shortly before the end of one fiscal year, with money already committed for the next—left the consortium and its member libraries feeling ambushed. “There was a very, very deep collective sigh of, ‘Oh my gosh, not again,’” says Susan M. Stearns, the consortium’s executive director.

The word “again” is telling. Academic librarians have long decried the prices commercial publishers charge for access to serial publications, particularly electronic journals in the sciences. With journal packages taking up increasingly large chunks of library budgets, the prospect of publishers’ ramping up prices on another digital format has spooked some librarians.

“I think the fear here is that we got burned by locking into journal contracts that we should have never locked ourselves into,” says Bryn I. Geffert, librarian of Amherst College. “Once burned, twice cautious.”

Publishers contend that the e-book-pricing model was still in beta, and that recent changes are simply a market correction. But the tone and intensity of reaction to what otherwise seems like a routine, if poorly timed, price increase has exposed a lingering sense of suspicion between large, mostly commercial publishers and academic libraries. “There is in fact mistrust between the academic libraries and some of the large commercial publishers because of past pricing behavior,” says Ms. Stearns.

Kelsey Corlett-Rivera, a librarian at the University of Maryland at College Park who recently published a study on e-book use at the institution, says mistrust has spurred efforts on the part of academic librarians to seek the upper hand when it comes to e-book pricing. “There’s a big push for the libraries to set the agenda this time around,” Ms. Corlett-Rivera says.

At issue is a short-term loan model for e-book purchasing that has been tested over the past two years. It allows libraries to offer large catalogs but pay for only those books that are actually used—and not to pay full price until books have been used several times.

Each time a client checks out one of the e-books in these “demand-driven acquisition pools,” the libraries pay a portion of the title’s list price—from 10 to 80 percent, depending on the length of the loan and the publisher’s rate. After a certain number of loans—publishers say the number can be as low as two, theoretically, or high as 25—the library automatically buys the title at full price.

‘Existential Threat’

But the resistance from academic librarians indicates a weightier battle playing out between libraries and publishers, one that extends beyond the contours of a single pricing dispute. In March, the Oberlin Group, a consortium of 80 liberal-arts colleges that includes Amherst, published a statement calling for an end to “restrictive licensing agreements” that prevent e-books from being shared among libraries the way hard copies pass through Interlibrary Loan. The statement, signed by Mr. Geffert and 65 other academic librarians, called the current model of e-book exchange an “existential threat” to the “ecosystem of sharing.”

Two months later, after the announced cost shift on short-term e-book loans, Ms. Stearns and John Unsworth, the Boston consortium’s president-elect, wrote a stern letter to The Chronicle accusing the commercial publishers of “price gouging.” The letter referenced continuing dissatisfaction with scientific-journal pricing. “We’ve seen it before, and we should not stand for it again,” the letter read.

ADVERTISEMENT

The consortium also hinted that publishers might have acted in concert to raise prices. Ms. Stearns stands by that inference. “I have no direct evidence that there’s been any sort of collusion here, but it certainly seems suspicious,” she says.

Meanwhile, the Orbis Cascade Alliance, a collective of 37 libraries in the Pacific Northwest, published a “cost-containment update” on its website to alert members about the changing prices and map out possible responses. Kathi Carlisle Fountain, Orbis Cascade’s collection-services program manager, says the alliance will have to remove about 5,000 titles from its pool of 18,500 e-books in order to accommodate the changes.

She says Orbis Cascade’s members appreciated the sentiment in the Boston consortium’s letter and many felt similarly aggrieved. “We share their alarm at the rise of the short-term loan rates,” Ms. Fountain says. Of the publishers, she says, “I’m glad that they’re calling them out.”

Publishers insist, however, that there was no conspiracy to raise prices and that the previous cost model for e-books wasn’t sustainable. “We had absolutely no knowledge and we weren’t advised by the aggregator at all that other publishers were making a change at the same time,” says Rebecca Seger, director of institutional sales for the Americas at Oxford University Press.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ms. Seger says that Oxford considered the current model a pilot, and that poor returns demanded higher rates. “We knew it was going to look like penalizing libraries, but it wasn’t,” she says of the recent price changes. “The model was just so one-sided, given how it was eventually used. We had to make some tweaks to make it sustainable.”

Publishers say that the model was intended as an alternative to Interlibrary Loan, but that it had instead became a way for students and professors to access low-circulation titles like scholarly monographs without libraries’ paying full freight for them. “A monograph could get used nine times. and a publisher still wouldn’t get list price,” Ms. Seger says. “Nine times? That’s huge for a monograph.” Under the model, she adds, “The books get used so much more, and we get paid so much less.”

Oxford University Press responded by raising the cost of short-term loans across the board. A 28-day loan that once cost 30 percent of the title’s list price will now cost 70 percent. The press also doubled the price of seven- and 14-day loans, while one-day loans jumped from 15 percent of list price to 25 percent.

Ms. Seger says that she regrets the timing of the announcement and that Oxford has delayed its price increases until July 1 to give libraries more time to wrangle with their budgets. She says the fact that almost a dozen publishers raised prices simultaneously reflects a common acknowledgment that the existing model didn’t work. Publishers began looking at data from short-term loan programs this year and quickly realized they weren’t favorable, she says. Then many presses waited until the end of the academic year to make changes.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I have to say I was surprised ... that so many publishers were making this change at the same time,” says Lisa Nachtigall, director of sales development for digital books at the publishing giant John Wiley & Sons. “But I don’t think it’s unexpected, given that we’ve all been participating in two years of very active pilots with these consortia.”

Ms. Nachtigall and Ms. Seger also point out that publishers have been warning libraries over the past half year that changes were coming to the short-term loan model.

Wiley, like Oxford, is trying to accommodate libraries as it reconfigures its pricing model for e-books. Ms. Nachtigall says Wiley has not signed any new formal agreements with aggregators, meaning its prices have not yet been revised. Ms. Nachtigall has reached out to both the Orbis Cascade Alliance and the Boston Library Consortium, an acknowledgment that the relationship between commercial publishers and some academic libraries has frayed. “We have to rebuild those bridges,” Ms. Nachtigall says.

Mr. Unsworth, the Boston consortium’s president-elect, agrees that publishers and libraries need to discuss issues like e-book pricing together as digital collections grow. But he also notes that any cost changes will be viewed by libraries as part of an historical tug-of-war that began with serials and has moved now to e-books.

“This isn’t the last chapter,” Mr. Unsworth says. “I would say we’re in the middle of a larger story here.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Technology Libraries
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Illustration showing details of a U.S. EEOC letter to Harvard U.
Bias Allegations
Faculty Hiring Is Under Federal Scrutiny at Harvard
Illustration showing nontraditional students: a pregnant worman, a soldier; a working professional; an elderly man; and a woman with an artificial leg
'Unique Needs'
Common App Takes an In-Depth Look at Independent Students
Photo-based illustration of a Sonoma State University clock structure that's fallen into a hole in a $100 bill.
Campus Crossroads
Sonoma State U. Is Making Big Cuts to Close a Budget Hole. What Will Be Left?
Illustration showing three classical columns on stacks of coins, at different heights due to the amount of coins stacked underneath
Data
These 32 Colleges Could Take a Financial Hit Under Republicans’ Expanded Endowment Tax

From The Review

Illustration depicting a pendulum with a red ball featuring a portion of President Trump's face to the left about to strike balls showing a group of protesters.
The Review | Opinion
Trump Is Destroying DEI With the Same Tools That Built It
By Noliwe M. Rooks
Illustration showing two men and giant books, split into two sides—one blue and one red. The two men are reaching across the center color devide to shake hands.
The Review | Opinion
Left and Right Agree: Higher Ed Needs to Change
By Michael W. Clune
University of British Columbia president and vice-chancellor Santa Ono pauses while speaking during a memorandum of understanding  signing ceremony between the Tsilhqot'in National Government and UBC, in Vancouver, British Columbia, on Dec. 8, 2021.
The Review | Opinion
Santa Ono Flees for Florida
By Silke-Maria Weineck

Upcoming Events

Plain_USF_AIWorkForce_VF.png
New Academic Programs for an AI-Driven Work Force
Cincy_Plain.png
Hands-On Career Preparation
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin