Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
News

Colleges Debate Whether Dropping the SAT Makes Them More Competitive

By Andrew Brownstein October 26, 2001

There’s almost a schizophrenia in college admissions,” says Dan Lundquist, vice president and dean of admissions at New York’s Union College.


ALSO SEE:

The SAT’s Greatest Test

ACT Sees Openings for Expansion in Debate Over the SAT


“There’s this mercenary instinct to put your colleges at the best possible advantage. At the same time, most of us are educators who are against that kind of crude positioning.”

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

There’s almost a schizophrenia in college admissions,” says Dan Lundquist, vice president and dean of admissions at New York’s Union College.


ALSO SEE:

The SAT’s Greatest Test

ACT Sees Openings for Expansion in Debate Over the SAT


“There’s this mercenary instinct to put your colleges at the best possible advantage. At the same time, most of us are educators who are against that kind of crude positioning.”

Nowhere is that clash of values more evident than in how administrators view their favorite whipping boys, the U.S. News & World Report college guide and the SAT. If one could find a way to use the test they love to hate to improve their standing in the rankings they love to hate, the result might prove irresistible.

The thesis, first stated last year by The New Republic, is that colleges are being less than honest about why they abolish requirements that applicants submit their SAT scores. Behind the rhetoric about “enhancing diversity” and creating a more “holistic approach” to admissions, the theory goes, many colleges “go optional” on the SAT to improve their rankings. The logic is rather simple: At an SAT-optional college, students with higher scores are far more likely to submit them, raising the institution’s mean SAT score and hence the heavily test-influenced rankings.

Additionally, more students will apply to an SAT-optional college, and thus a lower percentage will be admitted, increasing its “selectivity rating.”

“People will do what they have to do to stack the deck,” explains John Maguire, an admissions consultant and former admissions director at Boston College.

Not that anyone admits to it, of course. It’s those other colleges that do it. “It’s a nervous topic,” concedes an admissions director at a large Midwestern university, asking not to be named. “Nobody wants to be accused of picking on people.”

The cunning scheme seems so perfect that it has quickly taken on the character of an urban legend in some admissions circles, its truth rarely questioned.

The relationship between going optional and improving a college’s average test score is unquestionable. Almost a decade ago, when Ann Wright was an admissions dean at a Northeastern liberal-arts college, she sought a consultant’s advice on how to increase the college’s mean SAT score. “He told me that if we were really interested in raising our SAT’s, we should make our scores optional,” says Ms. Wright, now vice president for enrollment at Rice University.

The link between going optional and rising in the rankings is not so clear. What is amazing, given how often they complain about the seemingly mystical formulas that constitute the rankings, is how many admissions directors buy in to the quick-fix idea.

ADVERTISEMENT

The New Republic article noted that in 1996, Pennsylvania’s Muhlenberg College went optional and catapulted itself from the third tier to the second in the U.S. News rankings of liberal-arts colleges. That is true. But what the article did not say is that Muhlenberg reports an “all-inclusive profile” of its students’ scores, requiring those applicants who did not originally submit scores to do so after they enroll and counting the results in its overall tally. Christopher Hooker-Haring, dean of admissions and financial aid, cites the usual reasons for going optional -- the ability to “coach” to the test and the disproportionately lower scores among some minority groups, for example -- but emphatically states that “the rankings had absolutely nothing to do with our decision.”

Other colleges cited in the article, including Dickinson and Franklin & Marshall, may regret going optional, if a rankings boost was their true aim. Franklin & Marshall went optional in 1990, when its rank was 27th among liberal-arts colleges, and its listing has been lower ever since. It is now 36th. Dickinson was 40th when it went optional, in 1995. Since then, its ranking has dipped below that every year but one. It is now 44th.

Robert Morse, director of data research for the U.S. News rankings, explains that many admissions deans use gimmicks to improve their ratings without understanding how the list works. “If these are the same admissions deans who think that going early decision will improve their yield, and advance them in the rankings, their level of information is just irresponsible. They’re certainly kidding themselves if they think that going SAT-optional alone will move them in the rankings.”

One reason is that factors in the rankings sometimes work at cross-purposes. A college could go optional on the SAT but find that its retention rate suffers because of lower-caliber students. And despite what many academics think, it is very difficult to move far in the rankings, Mr. Morse says. A college would have to improve 40 percentage points in yield -- the proportion of admitted applicants who actually enroll -- in order to move more than one spot in the rankings by yield.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I get the impression that it takes a stick of dynamite and whole lot of money to move in the rankings,” says Union’s Mr. Lundquist.

But that doesn’t mean more colleges won’t try. In the end, the scheme may say more about the insanely competitive world of university admissions than about either the SAT or the rankings.

“It’s one of those soft-underbelly issues,” says the president of a liberal-arts college, who continues to doubt the motives of colleagues who go optional. “The market considerations are more pronounced than they once were, and we might not be as noble as we’d like to think.”


http://chronicle.com Section: Special Report Page: A14

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Mangan-Censorship-0610.jpg
Academic Freedom
‘A Banner Year for Censorship’: More States Are Restricting Classroom Discussions on Race and Gender
On the day of his retirement party, Bob Morse poses for a portrait in the Washington, D.C., offices of U.S. News and World Report in June 2025. Morse led the magazine's influential and controversial college rankings efforts since its inception in 1988. Michael Theis, The Chronicle.
List Legacy
‘U.S. News’ Rankings Guru, Soon to Retire, Reflects on the Role He’s Played in Higher Ed
Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits
Photo illustration showing a figurine of a football player with a large price tag on it.
Athletics
Loans, Fees, and TV Money: Where Colleges Are Finding the Funds to Pay Athletes

From The Review

A stack of coins falling over. Motion blur. Falling economy concept. Isolated on white.
The Review | Opinion
Will We Get a More Moderate Endowment Tax?
By Phillip Levine
Photo illustration of a classical column built of paper, with colored wires overtaking it like vines of ivy
The Review | Essay
The Latest Awful EdTech Buzzword: “Learnings”
By Kit Nicholls
William F. Buckley, Jr.
The Review | Interview
William F. Buckley Jr. and the Origins of the Battle Against ‘Woke’
By Evan Goldstein

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: A Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin