Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Title IX

Colleges Had 3 Months to Overhaul Sexual-Misconduct Policies. Now They’re Scrambling.

By Sarah Brown August 13, 2020
08/26/19 Gwynedd Valley, PA Portrait of Robert Wood the title IX coordinator at Gwynedd Mercy University. Ryan Collerd for The Chronicle
Robert Wood, Title IX coordinator at Gwynedd Mercy U.Ryan Collerd for The Chronicle

At any other moment, it would be major news: The sweeping new regulations governing campus sexual misconduct take effect on Friday. But as Covid-19 scuttles campus plans and decimates budgets, colleges are grappling with more existential questions — like, will they survive this academic year?

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

At any other moment, it would be major news: The sweeping new regulations governing campus sexual misconduct take effect on Friday. But as Covid-19 scuttles campus plans and decimates budgets, colleges are grappling with more existential questions — like, will they survive this academic year?

Needless to say, administrators’ attention was elsewhere this summer. That means, on many campuses, they’re scrambling to rewrite policies, make new hires, and train existing staff and faculty members on the rules interpreting Title IX, the gender-equity law. In some cases, the regulations require a complete overhaul of the way colleges investigate sexual assault and punish offenders.

“My impression is, everybody’s trying to write the paper and get it in on time,” said Alison Kiss Dougherty, associate vice president of human resources and Title IX coordinator at Widener University.

Though colleges are trying their best, not every institution will be 100-percent ready for prime time on Friday, experts say. That could be to the detriment of students. While this semester could play out differently due to Covid-19, the first six weeks of the fall are traditionally a time when there’s a higher incidence of sexual misconduct.

Some overwhelmed institutions just started thinking about the regulations a few days ago, said Jody Shipper, a former campus Title IX official who now advises colleges as the managing director for Grand River Solutions, a consulting firm. A handful of the colleges she works with called her last week in a panic, saying they hadn’t revised their policies yet and needed her help.

The new rules, published in May, mark the first time that colleges’ responsibilities to respond to sexual assault and harassment have been spelled out in federal regulations, which have the force of law. In the past, the Education Department has issued guidance documents on campus sexual assault, which are not legally binding.

Colleges had fewer than 100 days to comply with the 2,000 pages of regulations. In May, the American Council on Education called the timing “cruel.”

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos said that she didn’t want to delay their release because sexual-assault cases were being decided even in the midst of the pandemic. “Civil rights really can’t wait,” she said. She also said that, because students have mostly been away from campuses since March, it was “an ideal time” for administrators to overhaul their Title IX policies.

Earlier this week, judges in New York and Washington, D.C., declined to issue an injunction that would have temporarily prevented the rules from taking effect.

The most pressing change for many colleges is the requirement for live hearings with cross examination. In other words, students and employees involved in a sexual-misconduct case will now have the chance, through their “advisers,” to question each other’s version of events and try to poke holes in their narrative. Supporters of required hearings have said that, in cases where expulsion from college is potentially on the line, accused students need more opportunities to defend themselves.

ADVERTISEMENT

A lot of institutions have never done Title IX hearings before, including many small colleges and community colleges. And while more public universities were already holding them, in order to meet constitutional due-process standards, they’re still having to contend with a tangle of new mandates — and, given the size of their student bodies, higher caseloads.

Some of the staff members who most need training on the new Title IX rules have been furloughed all summer, said Courtney Bullard, a former campus counsel who now advises colleges on Title IX issues. And at small institutions, the one-person general counsel’s office, who usually plays a central role in Title IX matters, is busy grappling with thorny questions about things like contact tracing, Shipper said.

In the past, given staffing and resource challenges, those institutions tended to use a “single-investigator model,” instead of hearings, to resolve Title IX cases; the approach is now banned by the regulations. Under that model, one person investigated and decided whether the accused student or employee violated campus sexual-misconduct policies. Sometimes the investigation and decision were handled by different people, which was supposed to limit any one administrator’s influence over a case.

That’s how it worked at Widener, an institution of 6,500 students. Typically, Widener receives 30 to 40 sexual-misconduct reports per academic year, and five to 10 of them move through the formal investigation process, which will now include a hearing, Dougherty said.

ADVERTISEMENT

The problem with hearings for Widener and other small colleges is finding enough people to staff them, she said. In addition to a coordinator who handles intake of complaints and an investigator, they’ll now need either a hearing officer who presides over the proceedings or three to five hearing panelists, plus a different person to handle any appeals and advisers for each student or employee involved. If someone doesn’t bring their own adviser, the college must provide one.

The new Title IX rules have stringent limits on people filling multiple roles at once, citing the potential for conflicts of interest.

As the University of New Mexico prepares to hold Title IX hearings for the first time, the institution is hiring a full-time hearing officer and hearing coordinator. It wasn’t easy to make that happen.

“Just like every other institution during the pandemic, we are cutting costs wherever we can,” said Angela Catena, the university’s Title IX coordinator.

ADVERTISEMENT

But campus leaders decided that, given the high stakes, making new hires for hearings was worth the investment, Catena said. The workload at New Mexico, which enrolls about 23,000 students, will likely be substantial: In 2019, the university received nearly 500 Title IX reports, and 66 of them proceeded through a formal investigation. The university is also hiring two part-time advisers.

The advisers for the accuser and the accused will now have the job of cross examining the opposition. In the past, they weren’t typically active participants in hearings. They served more as a confidant and support person.

Students who can afford it often hire attorneys as their advisers. But it’s also common for students to tap a close friend. So students could end up cross examining other students, which worries Eric Butler, Title IX coordinator at John Carroll University. In other cases, Bullard said, an administrator might have to cross examine their own colleague.

In cases involving serious sexual misconduct, especially on small campuses where everyone knows everyone, those dynamics could quickly become fraught and uncomfortable.

ADVERTISEMENT

The administrators who are serving as hearing officers will have a tough job, too. During cross examination, they’ll have to determine, in real time, whether an adviser’s question should be permitted. For instance, they’ll have to artfully block questions about a student’s sexual history. “What they’re being asked to do is in some ways tantamount to a judge in a court of law,” Bullard said.

At John Carroll — which has previously used a review panel without live cross examination — Butler is the only full-time Title IX staffer. So the plan is to train a pool of about 40 faculty and staff members who can be tapped to fill the different hearing roles, he said.

But given the complexities, many colleges are not even worrying about staffing Title IX hearings themselves, if they can afford it. Valencia College, a community college in Florida, is planning to outsource everything. Getting faculty and staff members trained in time to run hearings, given that they’re still working remotely and busy getting ready for an unusual semester, was “too much,” said Bill Mullowney, general counsel at Valencia. So they’ll have “a stable of outside resources,” including attorneys, to tap as needed.

The expense should be manageable, at least at first, Mullowney said, given that Valencia is planning to hold 90 percent of its courses online this semester. The college also doesn’t have residential life. In all likelihood, he said, “we’re not going to be slammed with an immediate rush of cases.”

ADVERTISEMENT

On other campuses, officials cautioned that they weren’t sure Title IX reports would decrease. “In a perfect world, I would hope that our students would not engage in partying on the weekends, but the reality is, it might happen,” said Dougherty, who’s been getting a steady stream of Title IX reports since Widener moved online in March. Online-harassment issues may also tick up as more students take their classes virtually.

Fifteen or so colleges in the Philadelphia area are teaming up to try to relieve the financial burden of hearings. If a student at one campus needs an adviser who’s trained to do cross examination, that institution could tap a Title IX administrator at a different campus to fill that role, instead of shelling out for an attorney. The motto of the informal group is, “how can we help each other keep our heads above water?” said Robert Wood, Title IX coordinator at Gwynedd Mercy University.

Many campus officials hope they won’t have to use the new hearing process too often. Hearings and cross examination will only be required for cases that meets the new, narrower definition of sexual misconduct under the Title IX regulations: “so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively denies a person equal access to education.” More minor cases of harassment or unwanted touching would go through a different grievance process.

Wood, whose campus has 3,000 students, said he usually receives 20 to 30 sexual-misconduct reports a year, with a much smaller number going through a formal investigation. Much of the time, he said, he’s just connecting students with counseling and support services, and helping them adjust class schedules and dorm assignments. At a small college, that’s often the most pressing matter.

ADVERTISEMENT

But he’s worried that the mere possibility of a hearing will intimidate students and prevent them from coming forward at all. As a result, some victims might not get the help they need.

While administrators say they’re going to make sure their colleges are following the new Title IX rules, many of them aren’t happy about it.

“I’m frustrated that the Department of Education did not give us more time,” Dougherty said. “It was irresponsible for them to say, ‘Well, you have enough time to print a policy,’ but there’s so much more than just having this written.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
SarahBrown2024
About the Author
Sarah Brown
Sarah Brown is The Chronicle’s news editor. Follow her on Twitter @Brown_e_Points, or email her at sarah.brown@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin