Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
News

Committed to Diversity? Show Me the Money.

By Toby S. Jenkins September 18, 2016

Social justice is hot. Colleges pledge their commitment to it. Graduate programs claim to ground their curricula in it. Professors affirm it to be the foundation of their teaching and scholarship.

Read all about it — over and over and over again.

But stale social-justice statements do little to change failing practices and unfair policies. I don’t want to read another institutional statement on diversity. If you’re hungry, a statement reminding you of the importance of eating well only taunts you. If you’re ignored, oppressed, or harassed, a statement decrying obliviousness, oppression, and harassment only insults you.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Social justice is hot. Colleges pledge their commitment to it. Graduate programs claim to ground their curricula in it. Professors affirm it to be the foundation of their teaching and scholarship.

Read all about it — over and over and over again.

But stale social-justice statements do little to change failing practices and unfair policies. I don’t want to read another institutional statement on diversity. If you’re hungry, a statement reminding you of the importance of eating well only taunts you. If you’re ignored, oppressed, or harassed, a statement decrying obliviousness, oppression, and harassment only insults you.

So if you can’t tell through its words whether a college is committed to social justice, where should you look? At its budget.

Before becoming a professor of higher education, I spent 10 years at several institutions as a student-affairs administrator working in campus activities, fraternity and sorority life, residential life, orientation, and cultural centers. I saw the differences in allocations to those various departments. Some have a large staff, while others might be a one-person operation. Some have large budgets and can afford overnight staff retreats or promotional items to help get the department’s message out. Others can barely afford shoestring versions of their core programs.

Fall Diversity 16 - Cover
Diversity in Academe: Disability on Campus
This special report examines the challenges that students, academics, and colleges face in dealing with physical disabilities as well as conditions that are less visible.
  • How My Eating Disorder Nearly Killed Me
  • ‘You Have to Be Fearless’
  • How One College Helps Students With Learning Disabilities Find Their Way
  • Extra Time on an Exam: Suitable Accommodation or Legal Cheating?

When interviewing for a student-affairs position, I learned to ask to see the budget. Job negotiation wasn’t limited to my salary, relocation, and benefits. Particularly at the director level, I had to push for office budget increases, new staff or graduate-assistant positions, and facility enhancements. Despite strong institutional written commitments to diversity, multicultural-affairs departments and cultural centers are often notoriously underfunded. I grew tired of listening to the grand expectations of campus leaders without mention of the grand resources necessary to achieve them. Set lofty goals without funding them, and you’re setting your staff up to fail.

Budgets are moral documents that reflect institutional priorities. On many campuses, multicultural affairs isn’t expected to be as large, to do as much, or to be as integral to a campus as an office like student activities. Student activities is often viewed as a large operation that serves the entire campus, while multicultural affairs is seen as serving a smaller population of marginalized students.

Don’t get me wrong. I love student-activities programs. That’s why I hold them up as role models for the support necessary for cultural centers and diversity efforts. Inclusion and engagement programs, just like any other, require sufficient staffing, facilities, catering, and retreats. They don’t just serve marginalized students; they serve all students by creating a culturally rich environment that educates, stimulates, and entertains.

While I directed the Paul Robeson Cultural Center at Penn State, our World Cultural Festival brought more than 1,500 students, faculty, and staff together each year. Our weeklong social-justice program drew some 2,000 students. The line for tickets rivaled those for artists like Kanye West.

The vice president at the time began open budget hearings for student-affairs directors. I had mixed feelings about the concept but was won over because it allowed my colleagues to see how underfunded my department was. I had negotiated a small budget increase as part of my job offer, and I spent an exhausting amount of time raising funds for ambitious programs.

Set lofty goals without funding them, and you’re setting your staff up to fail.

What’s the problem with that, you ask? In an era of shrinking budgets, what’s wrong with fund raising? A lot. Do you see student-activities directors begging hat in hand for money toward first-year orientation or bonding activities? Why should cultural-center directors have to do so? Colleges say exposing students to different viewpoints and cultures is a crucial part of their educational mission. If so, then why is a reading by a prominent author, a performance by an ethnic dance troupe, or a regional food festival any less essential than transportation and guides for the incoming students’ canoe or hiking trip?

ADVERTISEMENT

I am often called to conduct comprehensive reviews of cultural centers and multicultural-affairs departments. But while colleges will pay for consultants, they don’t respond to consultants’ recommendations with the increased support necessary to remedy the shortcomings that have been found. Money is available to diagnose the problem but not to fix it. To draw a stark analogy: I’m a breast-cancer survivor. How horrible would it have been if I had only enough money to find out that I had cancer but not enough to afford surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation? When you don’t act on a program review, you kill the commitment to diversity through inaction.

I love music, and discussions of mission versus budget make me think of a classic rhythm-and-blues song by Gwen Guthrie, “Ain’t Nothin’ Goin’ On but the Rent.” “Nothin’ in life is free,” she sings. “That’s why I’m asking you what you can do for me. I’ve got responsibilities.”

Polish those mission statements, my friends in the executive suites, but if you really care about social justice, culture, and inclusion, and if you really want to attract the personnel to make them central to campus life, then heed Guthrie’s timeless advice:

“No romance without finance.”

Toby S. Jenkins is an assistant professor of higher education at Georgia Southern University. She is the author of My Culture, My Color, My Self: Heritage, Resilience, and Community in the Lives of Young Adults (Temple University Press, 2013), and Family, Community, & Higher Education (Routledge Press, 2012).

A version of this article appeared in the September 23, 2016, issue.
Read other items in Diversity in Academe: Disability on Campus.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Finance & Operations
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin