Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Community Colleges

Community-College Trustees Hear About Risks of Performance-Based Support

By Katherine Mangan October 1, 2013
Seattle

As more and more states tie their higher-education support to student performance, college leaders need to watch out for unintended effects that could hurt the very students they are trying to serve, a gathering of community-college trustees was told here on Tuesday.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

As more and more states tie their higher-education support to student performance, college leaders need to watch out for unintended effects that could hurt the very students they are trying to serve, a gathering of community-college trustees was told here on Tuesday.

“We want to improve outcomes, and putting money behind it is one way, but at the same time, you have to push back against the distortions and unintended consequences,” Thomas R. Bailey, director of the Community College Research Center at Columbia University’s Teachers College, said during a symposium sponsored by the Association of Community College Trustees.

State allocation formulas that reward community colleges based on the number of students they enroll have opened the doors of higher education to hundreds of thousands of students, Mr. Bailey and other speakers noted.

But getting them in the doors isn’t enough. Well under half of the students who enter degree programs at community colleges end up with certificates or degrees within six years, Mr. Bailey said.

A recent report by the University of Alabama at Tuscaloosa’s Education Policy Center said that 22 states had responded by adopting policies that allocate a significant portion of state money to colleges on the basis of student-performance milestones, like making it through remedial courses, earning a semester’s worth of credit toward a degree, or graduating with an associate degree.

Seven more states are making the transition to such a system, and 10 have had formal discussions about it. The report concluded that there is no compelling evidence that such policies have moved the needle on student performance.

Picking the Right Model

In theory, the idea of shifting the incentive from enrolling students to graduating them makes sense, Mr. Bailey said at Tuesday’s symposium. But he added that the jury is still out on the question of whether that approach improves learning. “We can raise completion rates by handing out more diplomas,” he said.

David Cannon, vice chancellor for finance and data management for the Ohio Board of Regents, said his state’s new allocation formula, which it has been phasing in since 2010, is working. Half of the state allocations that go to community colleges are now based on enrollment, 25 percent are based on course completions, and another 25 percent on “success points” such as progressing through remedial education and finishing the first 30 credit hours of classes. The state uses a different performance formula for four-year colleges.

Ohio’s approach rewards colleges that serve more at-risk students, as well as those with high enrollments of students pursuing a science, technology, engineering or mathematics degree.

Sara Goldrick-Rab, an associate professor of educational-policy studies and sociology at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, cautioned that there are many ways that performance-based models can go wrong: when states use inappropriate metrics to measure success, when too little money is distributed to make any difference, and when faculty members feel left out of the process.

In addition, she said, “You can exacerbate inequality if you create a system in which colleges that are ahead remain ahead and those that are behind remain behind.”

Mission Driven by Money

David A. Longanecker, president of the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, said he strongly supported rewarding colleges for how well their students perform. “I believe that paying people to do something is a lot more effective than asking them to do something,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

But he added that it has to be done carefully. “You have to honor the different missions of different institutions,” Mr. Longanecker said. “Otherwise, they’ll move toward the mission that’s getting the most money.” If serving the underserved is important to the college, the financial formula has to recognize that so that colleges don’t turn away from students who need their help most, he said.

Indiana, Ohio, and Tennessee are among the states whose performance-based models are the most advanced. Tennessee passed a law in 2010 that bases nearly all of the state’s public higher-education dollars on student-success benchmarks.

After the presentations, trustees gathered around tables to discuss whether the approach made sense for their states. Many aren’t yet sold. “I’m a little anxious that performance funding will be a new excuse for our legislature to cut funding to small, rural colleges like ours,” said M. Thomas Perkins, who serves on the board of Western Nebraska Community College. “I just don’t trust them.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
mangan-katie.jpg
About the Author
Katherine Mangan
Katherine Mangan writes about community colleges, completion efforts, student success, and job training, as well as free speech and other topics in daily news. Follow her @KatherineMangan, or email her at katherine.mangan@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
The Death of Shared Governance
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell
John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin