Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Student Housing
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Government

Congressional Report Blasts ‘a Jungle of Red Tape’ That Ensnares Colleges

By Kelly Field February 13, 2015
Washington

The nation’s colleges are “enmeshed in a jungle of red tape,” faced with federal regulations that are complicated, costly, and often confusing, according to a new report by a Congressional task force.

The report, produced by the American Council on Education, concludes that too many federal rules are “unnecessarily voluminous and too often ambiguous,” with “unreasonable” compliance costs. It calls for regulatory relief for colleges and an improved process for developing new rules.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The nation’s colleges are “enmeshed in a jungle of red tape,” faced with federal regulations that are complicated, costly, and often confusing, according to a new report by a Congressional task force.

The report, produced by the American Council on Education, concludes that too many federal rules are “unnecessarily voluminous and too often ambiguous,” with “unreasonable” compliance costs. It calls for regulatory relief for colleges and an improved process for developing new rules.

Sen. Lamar Alexander, Republican of Tennessee and chairman of the Senate education committee, said the report’s recommendations would guide his panel’s efforts to “weed the garden” in the forthcoming reauthorization of the Higher Education Act and would “allow colleges to spend more of their time and money educating students, instead of filling out mountains of paperwork.”

Mr. Alexander, who told The Chronicle that his “principal goal in higher education is to deregulate it,” said his committee would hold a hearing on the report’s findings this month.

Senator Alexander, a former secretary of education and college president, created the task force in November 2013, along with Sen. Barbara Mikulski, Democrat of Maryland; Sen. Richard Burr, Republican of North Carolina; and Sen. Michael Bennet, Democrat of Colorado. They asked the panel to identify specific recommendations to consolidate or eliminate, to quantify the time and costs of complying with specific rules, and to provide recommendations for improved rule making.

The task force, which comprised 16 current and former college leaders and lobbyists, met four times, consulted with representatives of more than 60 institutions, and commissioned three policy papers that were financed by the Lumina Foundation. Its conclusion: “We need to be smarter about the regulation of higher education.”

The report identifies several regulations that it says are ripe for reform, or removal. They include rules governing accreditation, campus crime, consumer information, distance education, and student aid. It also lays out “guiding principles” for developing and executing future rules.

Quantifying Costs

Nearly every federal agency imposes some regulatory burden on colleges, in areas as diverse as protecting human subjects of research and disposing of hazardous waste. While the government has no official estimate of how many regulations colleges face, the Catholic University of America, which tracks federal regulations, put the number at roughly 200 in 2008. The 2009 reauthorization of the Higher Education Act added dozens more rules and reporting requirements.

Colleges collectively spend 26.1 million hours each year completing forms required by the Department of Education alone, according to a recent report by the American Action Forum.

Most college officials will concede that most rules are worthwhile, and the task force’s report, for its part, goes out of its way to acknowledge “the important role regulations play in the oversight of federal investments.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Institutions of higher education must be careful stewards of federal funds, the federal government must ensure that public resources are not squandered, and students and taxpayers must be protected,” it says.

Still, the report continues, “the costs associated with heavy handed and poorly designed regulations can be enormous.”

Colleges have complained about the costs of complying with federal rules for years. But only a handful of colleges have tried to quantify their share of those costs, and no one has come up with a comprehensive price tag.

The report doesn’t attempt to do that, either, finding that “calculating the precise benefits and costs of regulation is both difficult and time consuming.” Instead, it offers three examples of colleges that tried to estimate their own compliance costs—ranging from roughly $300,000 a year at Hartwick College, a liberal-arts institution with an enrollment of about 1,500 students, to $150-million a year at the much larger Vanderbilt University.

Hungry for Regulation

The task force’s report comes as the Education Department is finalizing rules for teacher-preparation programs and gearing up for a new round of rule-making sessions on President Obama’s “Pay as You Earn” student-loan-repayment program. Those regulations come on the heels of new rules governing accreditation, PLUS loans, debit cards, gainful employment, state authorization, and the credit hour—all of which were begun by the department without Congressional action.

ADVERTISEMENT

The report takes several swipes at the department, noting its “increasing appetite for regulation” and raising concerns about “possible overreach.” The document also accuses the agency of appearing “indifferent to the regulatory burden it imposes” on colleges, and argues that it grossly underestimates the number of hours colleges take to comply with its rules.

In a news release, Senator Burr went even further, blaming rising tuition on the department’s “never-ending addiction to regulating colleges and universities.”

Denise Horn, a spokeswoman for the Education Department, said that it “is always interested in finding ways to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our regulations, as well as any reporting requirements for higher-education institutions, that are required as a consequence of the laws passed by Congress.”

“We are reviewing the report’s recommendations and look forward to working with Congress on behalf of the best interests of students and taxpayers,” she said.

Regulation by the Numbers

The authors of the report cited a number of examples in which, it said, the federal government is covering colleges with red tape. Here are a few numbers called out by the task force:

ADVERTISEMENT

945—Pages in the “gainful-employment rule,” which aims to keep colleges from saddling students with unmanageable debt.

300—Pages contained in the nine surveys that make up the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, or Ipeds.

300—Pages in the Handbook for Campus Safety and Security Reporting (also known as the ‘“Clery Handbook”), which outlines reporting requirements on campus crime and safety.

270—"Dear Colleague” letters and electronic announcements released by the Education Department in 2012.

ADVERTISEMENT

31—Pages in the department’s “At a Glance” summary of consumer disclosure requirements.

Kelly Field is a senior reporter covering federal higher-education policy. Contact her at kelly.field@chronicle.com. Or follow her on Twitter @kfieldCHE.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Law & Policy Political Influence & Activism
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Kelly Field
Kelly Field joined The Chronicle of Higher Education in 2004 and covered federal higher-education policy. She continues to write for The Chronicle on a freelance basis.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

UCLA students, researchers and demonstrators rally during a "Kill the Cuts" protest against the Trump administration's funding cuts on research, health and higher education at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) in Los Angeles on April 8, 2025.
Scholarship & Research
Trump Proposed Slashing the National Science Foundation’s Budget. A Key Senate Committee Just Refused.
Illustration of a steamroller rolling over a colorful road and leaving gray asphalt in its wake.
Newly Updated
Oregon State U. Will End a Renowned Program That Aimed to Reduce Bias in Hiring
Dr. Gregory Washington, president of George Mason University.
Another probe
George Mason President Discriminated Against White People After George Floyd Protests, Justice Dept. Says
Protesters gather outside the Department of Education headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 14, 2025 to protest the Trump administrations cuts at the agency.
An Uncertain Future
The Education Dept. Got a Green Light to Shrink. Here Are 3 Questions About What’s Next.

From The Review

Photo-based illustration with repeated images of a student walking, in the pattern of a graph trending down, then up.
The Review | Opinion
7 Ways Community Colleges Can Boost Enrollment
By Bob Levey
Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin