> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Standardized Tests
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Court Bars U. of California From Using ACT and SAT for Fall-2021 Admissions

By  Eric Hoover
September 1, 2020
At the U. of California at Los Angeles, administrators have encouraged professors to effectively boycott the publishing giant as the university system negotiates a new contract for access to the company’s journals.
U. of California at Los Angeles
U. of California at Los Angeles has a test-optional policy.

Opponents of standardized tests in admissions just won another round.

A California judge on Monday granted a preliminary injunction immediately barring the University of California system from using the ACT and SAT. The injunction had been sought by plaintiffs who cited state and federal disability laws in arguing that disabled students’ access to standardized tests is “either impossible or impaired” because of disruptions caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. Amid widespread school closures and an ongoing shortage of testing sites, many students who require accommodations have been unable to get them — or find suitable places to take exams.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Opponents of standardized tests in admissions just won another round.

A California judge on Monday granted a preliminary injunction immediately barring the University of California system from using the ACT and SAT. The injunction had been sought by plaintiffs who cited state and federal disability laws in arguing that disabled students’ access to standardized tests is “either impossible or impaired” because of disruptions caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. Amid widespread school closures and an ongoing shortage of testing sites, many students who require accommodations have been unable to get them — or find suitable places to take exams.

The barriers faced by students with disabilities are indisputably significantly greater than those faced by nondisabled students.

In his ruling, Judge Brad Seligman of the Superior Court of California for Alameda Country concluded that the plaintiffs had made a “substantial” case that they would very likely succeed on the merits at a trial. “To be sure, Covid-19 has disrupted the testing process for many students,” Judge Seligman wrote. “But the barriers faced by students with disabilities are indisputably significantly greater than those faced by nondisabled students.”

The judge’s ruling is the latest twist in the Golden State’s closely watched testing saga. In late May, the University of California’s Board of Regents voted unanimously to phase out the ACT and SAT by 2025. Under that plan, the system would no longer require applicants to submit test scores, starting with the current admissions cycle. For the fall of 2023 and 2024, each campus would be “test blind,” meaning that they wouldn’t consider test scores for admission, though they could still use the scores to assess applicants’ eligibility for scholarships and the system’s statewide admissions guarantee.

ADVERTISEMENT

Three UC campuses — Berkeley, Irvine, and Santa Cruz — had already adopted “test blind” policies for fall-2021 applicants. UCLA, UC-Riverside, and UC-San Diego, had planned for test-optional policies, allowing applicants to send ACT and SAT scores, or not. The rest of the campuses had yet to reach a decision.

Lawyers representing a group of prospective students and nonprofit organizations in a lawsuit challenging UC’s testing policies filed a motion in July to prevent all the system’s campuses from considering the ACT and SAT scores for admission and scholarships. “By adopting a so-called ‘test optional’ admissions policy under which submitting an SAT or ACT score is an option for all students except those with disabilities,” the motion said, “the Regents have created an unlawful two-tiered admissions system. Under that system, students without disabilities can continue to take the tests and use their high scores to their advantage, whereas students with disabilities ... are effectively barred from testing with the accommodations they need.”

In short, the lawsuit asked the court to consider the full meaning of “test optional.” Traditionally, the term has been associated with an applicant’s freedom to choose not to submit test scores that she already has. But what about disabled students who don’t have the option of submitting scores that might help their chances of admission, because they’re unable to take an exam?

Lawyers for UC had argued that the plaintiffs could not show that test-optional polices would harm disabled applicants. But Judge Seligman wrote that the Americans With Disabilities Act didn’t require the plaintiffs to prove such an impact. “The question here,” he wrote, “is whether the inability of persons with disabilities to avail themselves of the test option, and thus the inability to take advantage of the ‘plus factor’ or ‘second look’ available to test takers is a denial of meaningful access to an opportunity or benefit that persons without disabilities enjoy.”

His answer: Yes.

ADVERTISEMENT

In a written statement, Marci Lerner Miller of the Miller Advocacy Group, which is helping represent the plaintiffs, called the ruling “a monumental step toward removing barriers long faced by students with disabilities in higher education.”

Robert A. Schaeffer, interim executive director of the National Center for Fair and Open Testing (FairTest), described the decision as a major “step forward” in the movement to eliminate colleges’ reliance on the ACT and SAT. “The preliminary injunction is crystal clear that there cannot be a level playing field for test-takers with disabilities,” he said in a written statement. “This ruling has national implications — the same protections under the Americans With Disability Act should apply to all test-takers across the nation.”

In a written statement, the University of California said it it was considering further legal action: “UC respectfully disagrees with the court’s ruling. An injunction may interfere with the university’s efforts to implement an appropriate and comprehensive admissions policies and its ability to attract and enroll students of diverse backgrounds and experiences.”

For now, one thing seems clear: Covid-19 will continue to intensify longstanding questions about the inequities of standardized testing that colleges cannot ignore.

A version of this article appeared in the September 18, 2020, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Admissions & Enrollment
Eric Hoover
Eric Hoover writes about the challenges of getting to, and through, college. Follow him on Twitter @erichoov, or email him, at eric.hoover@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin